Literature DB >> 27545078

Validation of a new computational 6-DOF knee simulator during dynamic activities.

Clare K Fitzpatrick1, Chase Maag2, Chadd W Clary2, Amber Metcalfe2, Jason Langhorn2, Paul J Rullkoetter1.   

Abstract

A new six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) joint simulator has recently been developed which facilitates testing of implants under more realistic loading conditions than has been possible previously. However, typical wear testing can be very time-consuming, taking weeks or months to complete. A validated computational model is an ideal complement to these types of long-running tests. In this study, a computational counterpart to the new 6-DOF joint simulator was developed and validated. Total knee replacement components were evaluated in both physical and computational simulations, and joint mechanics were compared between the experiment and the model. Kinematic comparisons were carried out for two total knee replacement designs, under loading conditions representative of three different activities of daily living: deep knee bend, gait, and stepdown. The model accurately reproduced the motions obtained in the physical simulator, and appropriately differentiated between activities and between implant designs. Root-mean-square differences in anterior-posterior translations and internal-external rotations were less than 1.7mm and 1.4°, respectively, for both implant designs and all three dynamic activities. Contact area, and peak and average contact pressure predicted by the model matched experimental measurements with a root-mean-square accuracy of 20mm2, 9MPa, and 1MPa, respectively. The computational model of the 6-DOF joint simulator will be a key tool in efficient evaluation of implant mechanics under loading conditions representative of the in vivo environment. These simulations may be used directly in comparison of devices, or may aid in facilitating optimal usage of the physical simulator through determining which activities and/or loading conditions best address specific clinical or design issues, for example, development of worst-case loading profiles for wear testing.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Experimental simulator; Kinematics; Load control; Total knee replacement; Wear testing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27545078     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduces Polyethylene Contact Pressure by Increasing the Contact Area, When Compared to Mechanical Alignment-A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; Andreas Kapshammer; Veronika Miron; Zoltan Major
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-05

2.  Comparison of Kinematics and Contact Mechanics in Normal Knee and Total Knee Replacements: A Computational Investigation.

Authors:  Liming Shu; Takashi Sato; Xijin Hua; Naohiko Sugita
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  The impact of variations in input directions according to ISO 14243 on wearing of knee prostheses.

Authors:  Xiao-Hong Wang; Wei Zhang; Da-Yong Song; Hui Li; Xiang Dong; Min Zhang; Feng Zhao; Zhong-Min Jin; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.