Literature DB >> 2754479

Efferent neurons and suspected interneurons in S-1 vibrissa cortex of the awake rabbit: receptive fields and axonal properties.

H A Swadlow1.   

Abstract

1. The behavioral tractability of the rabbit was exploited and enabled, in the fully awake state, receptive-field analysis of antidromically identified efferent neurons within the vibrissa representation of primary somatosensory cortex (S-1). Efferent neurons studied included ipsilateral corticocortical neurons (C-IC neurons, n = 56) that project to or beyond the second somatosensory cortical area (S-2) and corticofugal neurons of layer 5 (CF-5 neurons, n = 75) and layer 6 (CF-6 neurons, n = 92) that project to and/or beyond the thalamus. 2. An additional class of neurons was studied that was not activated antidromically from any stimulus site, but which responded synaptically to electrical stimulation of the ventrobasal (VB) thalamus with a burst of three or more spikes at frequencies of 600 to greater than 900 Hz. Most of these neurons also responded synaptically to stimulation of S-2. The action potentials of these neurons were much shorter (mean = 0.43 ms), than those of efferent neurons (mean = 0.98 ms). Such properties have been associated with interneurons found throughout the central nervous system, and these neurons are thereby referred to as suspected interneurons (SINs). Although SINs were found at all cortical depths, a strong peak in the distribution occurred just superficial to the peak in the distribution of CF-5 neurons. Most SINs located within this peak responded to deflection of only a single vibrissa. In contrast, SINs located in layer 6 and in layer 2-3 responded to deflection of many vibrissae (median = 11.0 and 5.5 vibrissae, respectively). In addition, SINs of layer 6 and layer 2-3 had significantly longer synaptic latencies to stimulation of VB thalamus than did SINs located at intermediate cortical depths. 3. The properties of efferent neurons and SINs differed considerably. Efferent neurons never responded to stimulation of VB thalamus with the high-frequency burst of spikes characteristic of SINs. Although greater than 70% of CF-6, CF-5 and C-IC neurons had receptive fields that were directionally selective, only 20% of SINs showed any degree of directional selectivity. Furthermore, SINs showed both much lower angular thresholds to vibrissa deflection and a much greater ability to follow high-stimulus frequencies than was seen in efferent neurons. The spontaneous firing rates of SINs had a mean value of 16.5 spikes/s, which was the highest seen in any population within S-1. 4. CF-5 neurons had a number of properties which contrasted with those of both CF-6 and C-IC neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2754479     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1989.62.1.288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  76 in total

1.  Diverse types of interneurons generate thalamus-evoked feedforward inhibition in the mouse barrel cortex.

Authors:  J T Porter; C K Johnson; A Agmon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Thalamic-evoked synaptic interactions in barrel cortex revealed by optical imaging.

Authors:  N Laaris; G C Carlson; A Keller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The spatial dimensions of electrically coupled networks of interneurons in the neocortex.

Authors:  Yael Amitai; Jay R Gibson; Michael Beierlein; Saundra L Patrick; Alice M Ho; Barry W Connors; David Golomb
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cortical sensory suppression during arousal is due to the activity-dependent depression of thalamocortical synapses.

Authors:  Manuel A Castro-Alamancos; Elizabeth Oldford
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Thalamocortical control of feed-forward inhibition in awake somatosensory 'barrel' cortex.

Authors:  Harvey A Swadlow
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Activity of different classes of neurons of the motor cortex during locomotion.

Authors:  Irina N Beloozerova; Mikhail G Sirota; Harvey A Swadlow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Responses of barrel cortex neurons in awake rats and effects of urethane anesthesia.

Authors:  D J Simons; G E Carvell; A E Hershey; D P Bryant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Infragranular barrel cortex activity is enhanced with learning.

Authors:  Rebekah L Ward; Luke C Flores; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The functional properties of barrel cortex neurons projecting to the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Takashi R Sato; Karel Svoboda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Subthreshold receptive field properties distinguish different classes of corticothalamic neurons in the somatosensory system.

Authors:  Ernest E Kwegyir-Afful; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.