Literature DB >> 27544439

Incorporating Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound into the BI-RADS Scoring System Improves Accuracy in Breast Tumor Diagnosis: A Preliminary Study in China.

Xiaoyun Xiao1, Licong Dong1, Qiongchao Jiang1, Xiaofeng Guan1, Huan Wu1, Baoming Luo2.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to develop a scoring model incorporating the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) scoring system to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions. A total of 524 solid breast masses in 490 consecutive patients were evaluated with conventional US and CEUS in this prospective study. Each lesion was scored according to BI-RADS, CEUS, and CEUS-rerated BI-RADS. The diagnostic specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of BI-RADS were 77.9%, 88.9% and 84.0%, respectively, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.834. The corresponding values for rerated BI-RADS were 82.1%, 96.9%, 90.3% and 0.895. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of BI-RADS alone was significantly smaller than that of CEUS and the rerated BI-RADS (p = 0.008 compared with CEUS, p = 0.002 compared with rerated BI-RADS). This study indicates that rerating BI-RADS with the CEUS scoring system improves its diagnostic accuracy.
Copyright © 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast tumors; Contrast agents; Differential diagnosis; Receiver operating characteristic curve; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27544439     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  6 in total

1.  Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound: Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kapetas; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Georg J Wengert; Mathias Lazar; Katja Pinker; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 2.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Treatment Modulation of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ioana Boca Bene; Sorin M Dudea; Anca I Ciurea
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-01-30

3.  Quantification and Classification of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Breast Cancer Data: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Georgios S Ioannidis; Michalis Goumenakis; Ioannis Stefanis; Apostolos Karantanas; Kostas Marias
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06

4.  Differentiation Between Granulomatous Lobular Mastitis and Breast Cancer Using Quantitative Parameters on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Authors:  Liang Yin; Enock Adjei Agyekum; Qing Zhang; Lei Pan; Ting Wu; Xiudi Xiao; Xiao-Qin Qian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) play a better role in diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification? A comparison with MRI.

Authors:  Jiamin Pan; Wenjuan Tong; Jia Luo; Jinyu Liang; Fushun Pan; Yanling Zheng; Xiaoyan Xie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Breast non-mass-like lesions on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: Feature analysis, breast image reporting and data system classification assessment.

Authors:  Ping Xu; Min Yang; Yong Liu; Yan-Ping Li; Hong Zhang; Guang-Rui Shao
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.