Literature DB >> 27544437

Prevalence of U.S. Pregnant Women Meeting 2015 ACOG Physical Activity Guidelines.

Kathryn R Hesketh1, Kelly R Evenson2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27544437      PMCID: PMC4982752          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

In December 2015, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) published updated physical activity (PA) guidelines for pregnant women, recommending women with uncomplicated pregnancies engage in ≥20–30 minutes/day of exercise on most days/week. Previous guidelines advocated ≥30 minutes/day of exercise on most days/week; updated recommendations represent a more obtainable PA target during pregnancy. Although previous estimates indicated that few women in the U.S. accrued sufficient PA during pregnancy, it is important to determine how many women meet new recommendations. This paper describes the prevalence of pregnant women meeting the 2015 ACOG PA guidelines.

Study Design

Data were from a population-based survey assessing the U.S. population’s health, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (collected 2007–2014; analyzed February 2016). PA was self-reported during interviews with 247 pregnant women aged 20–44 years, using a questionnaire.5, 6 Minutes/week women spent in moderate and vigorous leisure-time PA (LTPA) and in active transport (walking/cycling) during a typical week were derived. The number of days women engaged in weekly PA overall and by trimester of pregnancy (reported in 2007–2012 only; n=131) was calculated. Guidelines were operationalized as ≥100 or ≥150 minutes/week LTPA (i.e., ≥20 or ≥30 minutes on ≥5 days/week), with and without the requirement of “on most (5) days/week.” Whether including weekly active transport influenced the prevalence of women meeting PA guidelines was also explored. All estimates were weighted to reflect the U.S. population. NHANES participants gave informed written consent; the University of North Carolina IRB approved this study.

Results

Pregnant women were aged 28.8 (SD=6.0) years on average and had a mean BMI of 29.6 (SD=8.0); 65% women had some/college education, and 51% were of non-white ethnicity. Sixty percent of women reported engaging in no LTPA; those who did (n=148) were active for a median 150 (interquartile range [IQR], 80–240) minutes/week, which decreased by trimester (T1: 180 [60-300]; T2: 120 [60-150]; T3: 97.5 [60-200]; Kruskal–Wallis test, p=0.34). Those engaging in active transport (n=81) did so for a median 140 (60–270) minutes/week (T1: 180 [60-360]; T2: 180 [60-360]; T3: [60-270]; p=0.63]. The proportion of women meeting ACOG PA guidelines ranged from 12.7% to 45.0%, depending on operationalization (Table 1), and did not differ by trimester among the subsample. There was little difference in prevalence of women meeting guidelines when ≥5 days was specified (12.7%–13.3%). Ignoring “most days,” including women with any ≥100 minutes/week or ≥150 minutes/week of LTPA resulted in prevalences of 28.9% and 23.4%, respectively. Inclusion of active transport was associated with higher prevalence of meeting guidelines.
Table 1

Prevalence of Pregnant Women Meeting Updated ACOG 2015 Physical Activity Guidelines (n=247); NHANES 2007–2014

Physical activity threshold% (n)95% CI
Lower physical activity thresholda,b
 ≥100 minutes of LTPA on ≥5 days/week13.1 (29)8.0, 20.6
 Any ≥100 minutes of LTPA during week28.9 (67)24.2, 34.1
 ≥100 minutes of LTPA or active transport on ≥5 days/week13.3 (30)8.7, 19.8
 Any ≥100 minutes of LTPA or active transport during week45.0 (110)37.5, 52.6
Higher physical activity thresholdb,c
 ≥150 minutes of LTPA on ≥5 days/week12.7 (27)6.9, 22.2
 Any ≥150 minutes of LTPA during week23.4 (52)14.9, 34.9
 ≥150 minutes of LTPA or active transport on ≥5 days/week12.9 (28)7.5, 21.3
 Any ≥150 minutes of LTPA or active transport during week37.8 (89)32.6, 43.3

Note: LTPA defined as a moderate or vigorous intensity for ≥10 minutes; Active transport defined as walking or cycling for ≥10 minutes.

ACOG, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; LTPA, leisure-time physical activity; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Calculated by multiplying the lower 20-minute threshold by 5, where 5 is deemed to be “most” days.

No significant difference in women meeting PA guidelines by trimester (T1: n=39; T2: n=46; T3: n=46, χ2 test) for lower and higher physical activity thresholds, regardless of inclusion of “any” physical activity or active transport.

Calculated by multiplying the higher 30-minute threshold by 5, where 5 is deemed to be “most” days.

Conclusions

The updated ACOG guidelines recognize the benefits of PA during pregnancy, providing women with a more manageable target of ≥20 minutes of exercise on most days/week. Yet, most U.S. pregnant women reported LTPA below this target, in part explaining why the few women meet guidelines, regardless of trimester. Interestingly, using the thresholds of ≥100 versus ≥150 minutes/week made little difference to the proportion of women meeting guidelines, but removing the need to engage in PA on ≥5 days/week resulted in approximately double the number of women meeting guidelines. In current ACOG guidelines, active transport does not contribute to “exercise,” yet makes a meaningful contribution to women’s overall PA, mainly through walking. Consequently, including active transport in women’s weekly PA had a substantial impact on the proportion of women classified as meeting recommendations. Although new ACOG guidelines were largely based on research using self-report measures, self-reported PA is often higher than accelerometry. Findings here may therefore represent an overestimation of women meeting PA guidelines. As NHANES ceased to oversample pregnant women during the study period, this study combined data from 2007 to 2014, preventing analysis of trends. It was also unable to identify women for whom PA was contraindicated. Nevertheless, practitioners face a considerable challenge in ensuring that pregnant women free of complications meet PA guidelines. However, practitioners are well placed to highlight the benefits of PA; to assess PA readiness (using resources like the PA Readiness Medical Examination, a guideline for health screening prior to exercise participation); and advise on how to exercise safely during pregnancy. In light of these findings, emphasizing the need to be physically active across the week and the various types of activity (e.g. active transport) that contribute toward daily PA (where not contraindicated) may also be helpful, as PA does not have to be limited to planned exercise. Finally, given the current extent of low PA during pregnancy, multilevel approaches (e.g., intervening at the individual, interpersonal, and community levels simultaneously) will likely best support pregnant women and encourage them to achieve PA recommendations.
  7 in total

1.  International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity.

Authors:  Cora L Craig; Alison L Marshall; Michael Sjöström; Adrian E Bauman; Michael L Booth; Barbara E Ainsworth; Michael Pratt; Ulf Ekelund; Agneta Yngve; James F Sallis; Pekka Oja
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Prevalence and correlates of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior among US pregnant women.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Fang Wen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Walking for Transportation and Leisure Among U.S. Adults--National Health Interview Survey 2010.

Authors:  Prabasaj Paul; Susan A Carlson; Dianna D Carroll; David Berrigan; Janet E Fulton
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2015-06-16

4.  ACOG Committee opinion. Number 267, January 2002: exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  National trends in self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviors among pregnant women: NHANES 1999-2006.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Fang Wen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 650: Physical Activity and Exercise During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Change in active transportation and weight gain in pregnancy.

Authors:  Marianne Skreden; Nina C Øverby; Linda R Sagedal; Ingvild Vistad; Monica K Torstveit; Hilde Lohne-Seiler; Elling Bere
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 6.457

  7 in total
  44 in total

1.  Pioneer baby: suggestions for pre- and postnatal health promotion programs from rural English and Spanish-speaking pregnant and postpartum women.

Authors:  Lisette T Jacobson; Rosalee Zackula; Michelle L Redmond; Jennifer Duong; Tracie C Collins
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-02

Review 2.  Benefits of Physical Activity during Pregnancy and Postpartum: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Loretta Dipietro; Kelly R Evenson; Bonny Bloodgood; Kyle Sprow; Richard P Troiano; Katrina L Piercy; Alison Vaux-Bjerke; Kenneth E Powell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  The Feasibility and Efficacy of a Behavioral Intervention to Promote Appropriate Gestational Weight Gain.

Authors:  Meghan Baruth; Rebecca A Schlaff; Samantha Deere; Jessica L Walker; Brenna L Dressler; Sarah F Wagner; Ashley Boggs; Holly A Simon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-12

4.  Spousal influence on physical activity in physically inactive pregnant women: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  JiWon Choi; Yoshimi Fukuoka
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2017-12-14

5.  Effect of Evidence-Based Materials and Access to Local Resources on Physical Activity Levels, Beliefs, and Motivation During Pregnancy in a Rural Setting.

Authors:  Rachel Tinius; Kolbi Edens; Kim Link; M Susan Jones; Scott Lyons; Tatum Rebelle; Kevin J Pearson; Jill Maples
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2020-08-28

Review 6.  Exercise in Pregnant Women with Diabetes.

Authors:  Tricia M Peters; Anne-Sophie Brazeau
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Physical Activity and Risk of Preterm Birth in a Cohort of African American Women.

Authors:  Jennifer K Straughen; Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Michael Bazydlo; Laura Helmkamp; Dawn P Misra
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2018-05-07

8.  Changes in Physical Activity and Television Viewing From Pre-pregnancy Through Postpartum Among a Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Perinatal Adolescent Population.

Authors:  A Gamble; B M Beech; C Blackshear; S J Herring; M A Welsch; J B Moore
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.814

9.  Objectively Measured Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity Across 3 Trimesters of Pregnancy: The Monitoring Movement and Health Study.

Authors:  Bethany Barone Gibbs; Melissa A Jones; John M Jakicic; Arun Jeyabalan; Kara M Whitaker; Janet M Catov
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2021-01-28

10.  Exercise Counseling in Pregnancy: Do Women Perceive Receiving the Information They Need?

Authors:  Connor Evins; Jasmine Dennis; Karson Mostert; Shiv Patel; David Enyart; Kacey Eichelberger; Joseph Ewing; Xiyan Tan; Jennifer L Trilk
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2021-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.