Zhibo Gao1, Lingtao Qian2, Chaoshi Niu3, Bin Chen2, Hongjun Guo2, Pengju Sun2, Yongzhi Wang2, Liang Ning2, Qi Li2, Xianming Fu4. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China; Department of Neurosurgery, Fuyang City People's Hospital, Anhui Province, China. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Fuyang City People's Hospital, Anhui Province, China. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui Province, China. Electronic address: fuxianmingah@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To study the curative effect and prognosis of patients with basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhages treated using a transcortical-sulcus approach and compare with results obtained using the traditional cerebral cortex approach. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 106 patients with hypertensive hemorrhage in the basal ganglia who were treated using either a transcortical-sulcus approach or traditional cerebral cortex approach. The rate of rehemorrhage, incidence of epilepsy, and 3-month efficacy (defined by an activities of daily living score) rate between the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: The 3-month efficacy rates of patients treated using the transcortical-sulcus and traditional cerebral cortex surgical approaches were 78.4% and 60%, respectively (P < 0.05). The incidence of epilepsy was lower in the transcortical-sulcus approach group compared with the traditional approach group, and significant differences were detected between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The transcortical-sulcus approach can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with intracerebral hemorrhages in the basal ganglia and reduce the incidence of postoperative seizures.
OBJECTIVE: To study the curative effect and prognosis of patients with basal ganglia cerebral hemorrhages treated using a transcortical-sulcus approach and compare with results obtained using the traditional cerebral cortex approach. METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 106 patients with hypertensive hemorrhage in the basal ganglia who were treated using either a transcortical-sulcus approach or traditional cerebral cortex approach. The rate of rehemorrhage, incidence of epilepsy, and 3-month efficacy (defined by an activities of daily living score) rate between the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: The 3-month efficacy rates of patients treated using the transcortical-sulcus and traditional cerebral cortex surgical approaches were 78.4% and 60%, respectively (P < 0.05). The incidence of epilepsy was lower in the transcortical-sulcus approach group compared with the traditional approach group, and significant differences were detected between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The transcortical-sulcus approach can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with intracerebral hemorrhages in the basal ganglia and reduce the incidence of postoperative seizures.