Jasmien Lismont1, Anne-Sophie Janssens2, Irina Odnoletkova3, Seppe Vanden Broucke2, Filip Caron2, Jan Vanthienen2. 1. KU Leuven, Dept. of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Naamsestraat 69, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: Jasmien.Lismont@kuleuven.be. 2. KU Leuven, Dept. of Decision Sciences and Information Management, Naamsestraat 69, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. 3. KU Leuven, Dept. of Public Health, Kapucijnenvoer 35, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to guide healthcare instances in applying process analytics on healthcare processes. Process analytics techniques can offer new insights in patient pathways, workflow processes, adherence to medical guidelines and compliance with clinical pathways, but also bring along specific challenges which will be examined and addressed in this paper. METHODS: The following methodology is proposed: log preparation, log inspection, abstraction and selection, clustering, process mining, and validation. It was applied on a case study in the type 2 diabetes mellitus domain. RESULTS: Several data pre-processing steps are applied and clarify the usefulness of process analytics in a healthcare setting. Healthcare utilization, such as diabetes education, is analyzed and compared with diabetes guidelines. Furthermore, we take a look at the organizational perspective and the central role of the GP. This research addresses four challenges: healthcare processes are often patient and hospital specific which leads to unique traces and unstructured processes; data is not recorded in the right format, with the right level of abstraction and time granularity; an overflow of medical activities may cloud the analysis; and analysts need to deal with data not recorded for this purpose. These challenges complicate the application of process analytics. It is explained how our methodology takes them into account. CONCLUSION: Process analytics offers new insights into the medical services patients follow, how medical resources relate to each other and whether patients and healthcare processes comply with guidelines and regulations.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to guide healthcare instances in applying process analytics on healthcare processes. Process analytics techniques can offer new insights in patient pathways, workflow processes, adherence to medical guidelines and compliance with clinical pathways, but also bring along specific challenges which will be examined and addressed in this paper. METHODS: The following methodology is proposed: log preparation, log inspection, abstraction and selection, clustering, process mining, and validation. It was applied on a case study in the type 2 diabetes mellitus domain. RESULTS: Several data pre-processing steps are applied and clarify the usefulness of process analytics in a healthcare setting. Healthcare utilization, such as diabetes education, is analyzed and compared with diabetes guidelines. Furthermore, we take a look at the organizational perspective and the central role of the GP. This research addresses four challenges: healthcare processes are often patient and hospital specific which leads to unique traces and unstructured processes; data is not recorded in the right format, with the right level of abstraction and time granularity; an overflow of medical activities may cloud the analysis; and analysts need to deal with data not recorded for this purpose. These challenges complicate the application of process analytics. It is explained how our methodology takes them into account. CONCLUSION: Process analytics offers new insights into the medical services patients follow, how medical resources relate to each other and whether patients and healthcare processes comply with guidelines and regulations.
Authors: Ashimiyu B Durojaiye; Nicolette M McGeorge; Lisa L Puett; Dylan Stewart; James C Fackler; Peter L T Hoonakker; Harold P Lehmann; Ayse P Gurses Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Ian Litchfield; Ciaron Hoye; David Shukla; Ruth Backman; Alice Turner; Mark Lee; Phil Weber Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Emmanuel Helm; Anna M Lin; David Baumgartner; Alvin C Lin; Josef Küng Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 3.390