Samantha Simpson1, Anita D'Aprano2, Collette Tayler2, Siek Toon Khoo3, Roxanne Highfold4. 1. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, 100 Leicester Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia. Electronic address: samantha.simpson@unimelb.edu.au. 2. Melbourne Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, 100 Leicester Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia. 3. Australian Council for Educational Research, 19 Prospect Hill Road, Camberwell, VIC 3124, Australia. 4. Central Australian Aboriginal Congress, PO Box 1604, Alice Springs, NT 0871, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early detection of developmental problems is important for facilitating access to targeted intervention and maximising its positive effects. The later problems are identified, the more likely that they will become increasingly difficult to ameliorate. Standardised developmental screening tools are known to improve detection rates of developmental problems compared to clinical judgement alone and are widely recommended for use with all children. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) is a tool that is widely used in Australia. However, mainstream screening tools may not be appropriate for remote-dwelling Australian Aboriginal children. While Australian Aboriginal children face multiple developmental risk factors, there are no developmental screening tools that have been validated for use in this population. AIMS: To determine the concurrent validity of the culturally adapted ASQ-3 - the ASQ-TRAK - for Australian Aboriginal children compared to the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III), a standardised, professionally administered developmental assessment. SUBJECTS: The ASQ-TRAK and Bayley-III were administered cross-sectionally to 67 Central Australian Aboriginal children between 2 and 36months of age. RESULTS: The ASQ-TRAK communication, gross motor, fine motor and problem-solving domains and the corresponding domains on the Bayley-III were moderately correlated. Overall sensitivity for the ASQ-TRAK was 71% (95% CI 29-96) and specificity was 92% (95% CI 88-99). Percentage agreement between the ASQ-TRAK and the Bayley-III was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The ASQ-TRAK shows promise as a tool that can be used to improve developmental monitoring for remote dwelling Australian Aboriginal children. Further research is necessary to build on the current findings.
BACKGROUND: Early detection of developmental problems is important for facilitating access to targeted intervention and maximising its positive effects. The later problems are identified, the more likely that they will become increasingly difficult to ameliorate. Standardised developmental screening tools are known to improve detection rates of developmental problems compared to clinical judgement alone and are widely recommended for use with all children. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3) is a tool that is widely used in Australia. However, mainstream screening tools may not be appropriate for remote-dwelling Australian Aboriginal children. While Australian Aboriginal children face multiple developmental risk factors, there are no developmental screening tools that have been validated for use in this population. AIMS: To determine the concurrent validity of the culturally adapted ASQ-3 - the ASQ-TRAK - for Australian Aboriginal children compared to the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley-III), a standardised, professionally administered developmental assessment. SUBJECTS: The ASQ-TRAK and Bayley-III were administered cross-sectionally to 67 Central Australian Aboriginal children between 2 and 36months of age. RESULTS: The ASQ-TRAK communication, gross motor, fine motor and problem-solving domains and the corresponding domains on the Bayley-III were moderately correlated. Overall sensitivity for the ASQ-TRAK was 71% (95% CI 29-96) and specificity was 92% (95% CI 88-99). Percentage agreement between the ASQ-TRAK and the Bayley-III was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: The ASQ-TRAK shows promise as a tool that can be used to improve developmental monitoring for remote dwelling Australian Aboriginal children. Further research is necessary to build on the current findings.
Authors: Carly R Luke; Katherine Benfer; Leeann Mick-Ramsamy; Robert S Ware; Natasha Reid; Arend F Bos; Margot Bosanquet; Roslyn N Boyd Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 2.692