Literature DB >> 27544054

Safety and Immunogenicity of the PRAME Cancer Immunotherapeutic in Patients with Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase I Dose Escalation Study.

Jean-Louis Pujol1, Tommaso De Pas2, Achim Rittmeyer3, Eric Vallières4, Bartosz Kubisa5, Eugeny Levchenko6, Sebastian Wiesemann7, Gregory A Masters8, Robert Shen9, Sergei A Tjulandin10, Hans-Stefan Hofmann11, Nicolas Vanhoutte12, Bruno Salaun12, Muriel Debois12, Silvija Jarnjak12, Pedro Miguel De Sousa Alves13, Jamila Louahed12, Vincent G Brichard14, Frédéric F Lehmann13.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is standard treatment for surgically resected stage II to IIIA NSCLC, but the relapse rate is high. The preferentially expressed antigen of melanoma (PRAME) tumor antigen is expressed in two-thirds of NSCLC and offers an attractive target for antigen-specific immunization. A phase I dose escalation study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a PRAME immunotherapeutic consisting of recombinant PRAME plus proprietary immunostimulant AS15 in patients with surgically resected NSCLC (NCT01159964).
METHODS: Patients with PRAME-positive resected stage IB to IIIA NSCLC were enrolled in three consecutive cohorts to receive up to 13 injections of PRAME immunotherapeutic (recombinant PRAME protein dose of 20 μg, 100 μg, or 500 μg, with a fixed dose of AS15). Adverse events, predefined dose-limiting toxicity, and the anti-PRAME humoral response (measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were coprimary end points. Anti-PRAME cellular responses were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were treated (18 received 20 μg of PRAME, 18 received 100 μg of PRAME, and 24 received 500 μg of PRAME). No dose-limiting toxicity was reported. Adverse events considered by the investigator to be causally related to treatment were grade 1 or 2, and most were injection site reactions or fever. All patients had detectable anti-PRAME antibodies after four immunizations. The percentages of patients with PRAME-specific CD4-positive T cells were higher at the dose of 500 μg compared with lower doses. No predefined CD8-positive T-cell responses were detected.
CONCLUSION: The PRAME immunotherapeutic had an acceptable safety profile. All patients had anti-PRAME humoral responses that were not dose related, and 80% of those treated at the highest dose showed a cellular immune response. The dose of 500 μg was selected. However, further development was stopped after negative results with a similar immunotherapeutic in patients with NSCLC.
Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant setting; Immunotherapy; NSCLC; PRAME antigen; Safety

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27544054     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.08.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  17 in total

1.  Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma Immunohistochemistry Labeling in Uveal Melanomas.

Authors:  Saman S Ahmadian; Ian J Dryden; Andrea Naranjo; Angus Toland; Romain A Cayrol; Donald E Born; Peter S Egbert; Ryanne A Brown; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Jonathan H Lin
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2022-03-11

2.  PRAME Expression in Melanocytic Tumors.

Authors:  Cecilia Lezcano; Achim A Jungbluth; Kishwer S Nehal; Travis J Hollmann; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 3.  PRAME Immunohistochemistry as an Ancillary Test for the Assessment of Melanocytic Lesions.

Authors:  Cecilia Lezcano; Achim A Jungbluth; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Surg Pathol Clin       Date:  2021-04-28

4.  T-Cells Expressing a Highly Potent PRAME-Specific T-Cell Receptor in Combination with a Chimeric PD1-41BB Co-Stimulatory Receptor Show a Favorable Preclinical Safety Profile and Strong Anti-Tumor Reactivity.

Authors:  Nadja Sailer; Ina Fetzer; Melanie Salvermoser; Monika Braun; Doris Brechtefeld; Christian Krendl; Christiane Geiger; Kathrin Mutze; Elfriede Noessner; Dolores J Schendel; Maja Bürdek; Susanne Wilde; Daniel Sommermeyer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Comparison of Immunohistochemistry for PRAME With Cytogenetic Test Results in the Evaluation of Challenging Melanocytic Tumors.

Authors:  Cecilia Lezcano; Achim A Jungbluth; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.298

Review 6.  Vaccine Strategies to Improve Anti-cancer Cellular Immune Responses.

Authors:  Karim Vermaelen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  Recent Advances in Lung Cancer Immunotherapy: Input of T-Cell Epitopes Associated With Impaired Peptide Processing.

Authors:  Marine Leclerc; Laura Mezquita; Guillaume Guillebot De Nerville; Isabelle Tihy; Ines Malenica; Salem Chouaib; Fathia Mami-Chouaib
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  The role of the cancer testis antigen PRAME in tumorigenesis and immunotherapy in human cancer.

Authors:  Yichi Xu; Ruanmin Zou; Jing Wang; Zhi-Wei Wang; Xueqiong Zhu
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.831

9.  In vivo immuno-targeting of an extracellular epitope of membrane bound preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME).

Authors:  Dmitry Pankov; Ludvig Sjöström; Teja Kalidindi; Sang-Gyu Lee; Kjell Sjöström; Rui Gardner; Michael R McDevitt; Richard O'Reilly; Daniel L J Thorek; Steven M Larson; Darren Veach; David Ulmert
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-26

10.  The Superior Ability of Human BDCA3+ (CD141+) Dendritic Cells (DCs) to Cross-Present Antigens Derived From Necrotic Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Fei-Fei Gu; Kai Zhang; Li-Li Ma; Yang-Yang Liu; Chang Li; Yue Hu; Qi-Fan Yang; Jin-Yan Liang; Yu-Lan Zeng; Yan Wang; Li Liu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.