Toon Schiemsky 1 , Caroline Brusselmans 2 , Elke Nackers 2 , Pieter Vermeersch 3 , Koen Poesen 4 , Koen J O Desmet 2 , Nancy Boeckx 5 , Davy M J Kieffer 6 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the performance of a novel capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF) application for hemoglobinopathy screening on the recently introduced V8 E-Class platform. METHODS: Analytical performance of the V8 E-Class was evaluated and included assessment of hemoglobin A2 (HbA2) imprecision; linearity for HbA2, fetal hemoglobin (HbF), and sickle hemoglobin (HbS); and carryover for HbS. Furthermore, a method comparison with the Minicap Flex Piercing (Sebia, Lisses, France), the Variant Classic (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), and the G8 (Tosoh Europe, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) was done to assess analytical and clinical concordance. RESULTS: Total HbA2 imprecision was 3.26% and 3.14% for normal and elevated HbA2 controls and 5.16% and 3.58% for a normal and a heterozygous HbS patient sample, respectively. HbA2, HbF, and HbS showed acceptable linearity, and no carryover was observed. The method comparison showed good analytical concordance (r > 0.95) except for a homozygous HbS subset (r = 0.532-0.704). A comparable phenomenon was seen for the clinical concordance with good agreement in samples without variants (weighted κ > 0.80) but poorer agreement in HbS samples (κ < 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Good analytical performance was demonstrated for this novel CIEF application for hemoglobinopathy screening. Method comparison showed generally good correlation but highlights the need for standardization. Finally, software optimization could further add to its use for routine hemoglobinopathy screening. © American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the performance of a novel capillary isoelectric focusing (CIEF ) application for hemoglobinopathy screening on the recently introduced V8 E-Class platform. METHODS: Analytical performance of the V8 E-Class was evaluated and included assessment of hemoglobin A2 (HbA2 ) imprecision; linearity for HbA2 , fetal hemoglobin (HbF), and sickle hemoglobin (HbS); and carryover for HbS. Furthermore, a method comparison with the Minicap Flex Piercing (Sebia, Lisses, France), the Variant Classic (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), and the G8 (Tosoh Europe, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) was done to assess analytical and clinical concordance. RESULTS: Total HbA2 imprecision was 3.26% and 3.14% for normal and elevated HbA2 controls and 5.16% and 3.58% for a normal and a heterozygous HbS patient sample, respectively. HbA2 , HbF, and HbS showed acceptable linearity, and no carryover was observed. The method comparison showed good analytical concordance (r > 0.95) except for a homozygous HbS subset (r = 0.532-0.704). A comparable phenomenon was seen for the clinical concordance with good agreement in samples without variants (weighted κ > 0.80) but poorer agreement in HbS samples (κ < 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Good analytical performance was demonstrated for this novel CIEF application for hemoglobinopathy screening. Method comparison showed generally good correlation but highlights the need for standardization. Finally, software optimization could further add to its use for routine hemoglobinopathy screening. © American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2016. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Entities: Chemical
Disease
Gene
Species
Keywords:
Capillary isoelectric focusing; Capillary zone electrophoresis; Cation-exchange HPLC; Helena Biosciences V8 E-Class; Hemoglobinopathy screening
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2016
PMID: 27543981 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw124
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Clin Pathol ISSN: 0002-9173 Impact factor: 2.493