Literature DB >> 27543795

Influences on prescribing decision-making among non-medical prescribers in the United Kingdom: systematic review.

Trudi McIntosh1, Derek Stewart1, Katrina Forbes-McKay2, Dorothy McCaig1, Scott Cunningham3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suitably qualified non-medical healthcare professionals may now prescribe medicines. Prescribing decision-making can be complex and challenging; a number of influences have been identified among medical prescribers but little appears to be known about influences among non-medical prescribers (NMPs).
OBJECTIVE: To critically appraise, synthesize and present evidence on the influences on prescribing decision-making among supplementary and independent NMPs in the UK.
METHODS: The systematic review included all studies between 2003 and June 2013. Included studies researched the prescribing decision-making of supplementary and independent NMPs practising in the UK; all primary and secondary study designs were considered. Studies were assessed for quality and data extracted independently by two researchers, and findings synthesized using a narrative approach.
RESULTS: Following duplicates exclusion, 886 titles, 349 abstracts and 40 full studies were screened. Thirty-seven were excluded leaving three for quality assessment and data extraction. While all studies reported aspects of prescribing decision-making, this was not the primary research aim for any. Studies were carried out in primary care almost exclusively among nurse prescribers (n = 67). Complex influences were evident such as experience in the role, the use of evidence-based guidelines and peer support and encouragement from doctors; these helped participants to feel more knowledgeable and confident about their prescribing decisions. Opposing influences included prioritization of experience and concern about complications over evidence base, and peer conflict.
CONCLUSION: While there is a limited evidence base on NMPs' prescribing decision-making, it appears that this is complex with NMPs influenced by many and often opposing factors.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consultation; doctor–patient relationship; family health; multidisciplinary care; nurse practitioners; pharmacology/drug reactions.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27543795     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  3 in total

Review 1.  Future perspectives on nonmedical prescribing.

Authors:  Derek Stewart; Tesnime Jebara; Scott Cunningham; Ahmed Awaisu; Abdulrouf Pallivalapila; Katie MacLure
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  Potentially inappropriate medication prescribing by nurse practitioners and physicians.

Authors:  Lin-Na Chou; Yong-Fang Kuo; Mukaila A Raji; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 7.538

3.  A theoretically informed, mixed-methods study of pharmacists' aspirations and readiness to implement pharmacist prescribing.

Authors:  Derek Stewart; Abdulrouf Pallivalapila; Binny Thomas; Yolande Hanssens; Wessam El Kassem; Zachariah Nazar; Moza Al Hail
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-06-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.