AIMS: In everyday practice, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing is centralised in referral laboratories that receive paucicellular cytological specimens. Ideally, EGFR testing should be carried out in the centre where the patient is diagnosed such that the most cellular slide can be selected from in-house collected cytological material. However, available techniques are little standardised and difficult to be implemented in settings with little expertise in molecular testing. The Idylla EGFR prototype assay is a rapid and fully automated test which may easily be adopted by a wider number of pathological centres. This study assessed whether an Idylla EGFR prototype assay can be reliably applied to cytological lung cancer specimens. METHODS: The limit of detection (LOD) of the Idylla EGFR prototype assay was assessed by cell line dilution studies. A total of 10 ng was directly placed inside an Idylla EGFR prototype assay cartridge. Idylla results were compared with fragment length (exon 19 del) and Taqman assays. RESULTS: The Idylla EGFR prototype assay showed an LOD of 1% mutant allele and yielded valid results in 74/76 (97.3%) samples, detecting all the mutant cases (n=32) identified by standard techniques; in addition, Idylla detected two low abundance EGFR exon 19 deletions and two G719X exon 18 point mutations, not covered by our standard reference method. CONCLUSIONS: Idylla EGFR prototype assay is sensitive on extracted DNA and can reliably be applied on cytological samples, enabling implementation of EGFR testing even in less experienced diagnostic units. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
AIMS: In everyday practice, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing is centralised in referral laboratories that receive paucicellular cytological specimens. Ideally, EGFR testing should be carried out in the centre where the patient is diagnosed such that the most cellular slide can be selected from in-house collected cytological material. However, available techniques are little standardised and difficult to be implemented in settings with little expertise in molecular testing. The Idylla EGFR prototype assay is a rapid and fully automated test which may easily be adopted by a wider number of pathological centres. This study assessed whether an Idylla EGFR prototype assay can be reliably applied to cytological lung cancer specimens. METHODS: The limit of detection (LOD) of the Idylla EGFR prototype assay was assessed by cell line dilution studies. A total of 10 ng was directly placed inside an Idylla EGFR prototype assay cartridge. Idylla results were compared with fragment length (exon 19 del) and Taqman assays. RESULTS: The Idylla EGFR prototype assay showed an LOD of 1% mutant allele and yielded valid results in 74/76 (97.3%) samples, detecting all the mutant cases (n=32) identified by standard techniques; in addition, Idylla detected two low abundance EGFR exon 19 deletions and two G719X exon 18 point mutations, not covered by our standard reference method. CONCLUSIONS: Idylla EGFR prototype assay is sensitive on extracted DNA and can reliably be applied on cytological samples, enabling implementation of EGFR testing even in less experienced diagnostic units. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Maria-Rosa Ghigna; Adrian Crutu; Valentina Florea; Séverine Feuillet-Soummer; Pierre Baldeyrou; Julien Adam; Ludovic Lacroix; Benjamin Besse; Olaf Mercier; Elie Fadel; Peter Dorfmuller; Rida El Ayoubi; Vincent Thomas de Montpréville Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Amir Momeni-Boroujeni; Paulo Salazar; Tao Zheng; Nana Mensah; Ivelise Rijo; Snjezana Dogan; JinYuan Yao; Christine Moung; Chad Vanderbilt; Jamal Benhamida; Jason Chang; William Travis; Natasha Rekhtman; Marc Ladanyi; Khedoudja Nafa; Maria E Arcila Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Phillip Shepherd; Karen L Sheath; Sandar Tin Tin; Prashannata Khwaounjoo; Phyu S Aye; Angie Li; George R Laking; Nicola J Kingston; Christopher A Lewis; J Mark Elwood; Donald R Love; Mark J McKeage Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-09-16
Authors: Louise Johnston; Michael Power; Philip Sloan; Anna Long; Angela Silmon; Ben Chaffey; Andrea Jane Lisgo; Liam Little; Ellen Vercauteren; Torben Steiniche; Tine Meyer; John Simpson Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 3.411