R Drew Sayer1, Gregory G Tamer2, Ningning Chen3, Jason R Tregellas4, Marc-Andre Cornier5, David A Kareken6, Thomas M Talavage2, Megan A McCrory7, Wayne W Campbell8. 1. Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. 2. Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. 3. Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA. 6. Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. 7. Department of Nutrition, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. 8. Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA. campbellw@purdue.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The brain's reward system influences ingestive behavior and subsequently obesity risk. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a common method for investigating brain reward function. This study sought to assess the reproducibility of fasting-state brain responses to visual food stimuli using BOLD fMRI. METHODS: A priori brain regions of interest included bilateral insula, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, caudate, and putamen. Fasting-state fMRI and appetite assessments were completed by 28 women (n = 16) and men (n = 12) with overweight or obesity on 2 days. Reproducibility was assessed by comparing mean fasting-state brain responses and measuring test-retest reliability of these responses on the two testing days. RESULTS: Mean fasting-state brain responses on day 2 were reduced compared with day 1 in the left insula and right amygdala, but mean day 1 and day 2 responses were not different in the other regions of interest. With the exception of the left orbitofrontal cortex response (fair reliability), test-retest reliabilities of brain responses were poor or unreliable. CONCLUSIONS: fMRI-measured responses to visual food cues in adults with overweight or obesity show relatively good mean-level reproducibility but considerable within-subject variability. Poor test-retest reliability reduces the likelihood of observing true correlations and increases the necessary sample sizes for studies.
OBJECTIVE: The brain's reward system influences ingestive behavior and subsequently obesity risk. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a common method for investigating brain reward function. This study sought to assess the reproducibility of fasting-state brain responses to visual food stimuli using BOLD fMRI. METHODS: A priori brain regions of interest included bilateral insula, amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, caudate, and putamen. Fasting-state fMRI and appetite assessments were completed by 28 women (n = 16) and men (n = 12) with overweight or obesity on 2 days. Reproducibility was assessed by comparing mean fasting-state brain responses and measuring test-retest reliability of these responses on the two testing days. RESULTS: Mean fasting-state brain responses on day 2 were reduced compared with day 1 in the left insula and right amygdala, but mean day 1 and day 2 responses were not different in the other regions of interest. With the exception of the left orbitofrontal cortex response (fair reliability), test-retest reliabilities of brain responses were poor or unreliable. CONCLUSIONS: fMRI-measured responses to visual food cues in adults with overweight or obesity show relatively good mean-level reproducibility but considerable within-subject variability. Poor test-retest reliability reduces the likelihood of observing true correlations and increases the necessary sample sizes for studies.
Authors: Kate Baicy; Edythe D London; John Monterosso; Ma-Li Wong; Tuncay Delibasi; Anil Sharma; Julio Licinio Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-11-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marc-Andre Cornier; Kristina L McFadden; Elizabeth A Thomas; Jamie L Bechtell; Daniel H Bessesen; Jason R Tregellas Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Paul A M Smeets; Alain Dagher; Todd A Hare; Stephanie Kullmann; Laura N van der Laan; Russell A Poldrack; Hubert Preissl; Dana Small; Eric Stice; Maria G Veldhuizen Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: R Drew Sayer; Jaapna Dhillon; Gregory G Tamer; Marc-Andre Cornier; Ningning Chen; Amy J Wright; Wayne W Campbell; Richard D Mattes Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Elanor C Hinton; Laura A Birch; John Barton; Jeffrey M P Holly; Kalina M Biernacka; Sam D Leary; Aileen Wilson; Olivia S Byrom; Julian P Hamilton-Shield Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: J Malte Bumb; Falk Kiefer; Patrick Bach; Martin Grosshans; Anne Koopmann; Peter Kienle; Georgi Vassilev; Mirko Otto Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 5.270