Literature DB >> 27542724

Left posterior-dorsal area 44 couples with parietal areas to promote speech fluency, while right area 44 activity promotes the stopping of motor responses.

Nicole E Neef1, Christoph Bütfering2, Alfred Anwander3, Angela D Friederici4, Walter Paulus5, Martin Sommer6.   

Abstract

Area 44 is a cytoarchitectonically distinct portion of Broca's region. Parallel and overlapping large-scale networks couple with this region thereby orchestrating heterogeneous language, cognitive, and motor functions. In the context of stuttering, area 44 frequently comes into focus because structural and physiological irregularities affect developmental trajectories, stuttering severity, persistency, and etiology. A remarkable phenomenon accompanying stuttering is the preserved ability to sing. Speaking and singing are connatural behaviours recruiting largely overlapping brain networks including left and right area 44. Analysing which potential subregions of area 44 are malfunctioning in adults who stutter, and what effectively suppresses stuttering during singing, may provide a better understanding of the coordination and reorganization of large-scale brain networks dedicated to speaking and singing in general. We used fMRI to investigate functionally distinct subregions of area 44 during imagery of speaking and imaginary of humming a melody in 15 dextral males who stutter and 17 matched control participants. Our results are fourfold. First, stuttering was specifically linked to a reduced activation of left posterior-dorsal area 44, a subregion that is involved in speech production, including phonological word processing, pitch processing, working memory processes, sequencing, motor planning, pseudoword learning, and action inhibition. Second, functional coupling between left posterior area 44 and left inferior parietal lobule was deficient in stuttering. Third, despite the preserved ability to sing, males who stutter showed bilaterally a reduced activation of area 44 when imagine humming a melody, suggesting that this fluency-enhancing condition seems to bypass posterior-dorsal area 44 to achieve fluency. Fourth, time courses of the posterior subregions in area 44 showed delayed peak activations in the right hemisphere in both groups, possibly signaling the offset response. Because these offset response-related activations in the right hemisphere were comparably large in males who stutter, our data suggest a hyperactive mechanism to stop speech motor responses and thus possibly reflect a pathomechanism, which, until now, has been neglected. Overall, the current results confirmed a recently described co-activation based parcellation supporting the idea of functionally distinct subregions of left area 44.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Area 44; Automaticity; Broca's region; Motor imagery; Motor inhibition; Speech motor control; Stuttering

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27542724     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

Review 1.  The frontal aslant tract (FAT) and its role in speech, language and executive function.

Authors:  Anthony Steven Dick; Dea Garic; Paulo Graziano; Pascale Tremblay
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Abnormal neural response to phonological working memory demands in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Fanlu Jia; Peter T Fox; Wai Ting Siok; Li Hai Tan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Emily O Garnett; Andrew Etchell; Ho Ming Chow
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 7.519

4.  An fNIRS-Based Feature Learning and Classification Framework to Distinguish Hemodynamic Patterns in Children Who Stutter.

Authors:  Rahilsadat Hosseini; Bridget Walsh; Fenghua Tian; Shouyi Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Verbal Response Inhibition in Adults Who Stutter.

Authors:  Shanley B Treleaven; Geoffrey A Coalson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Brain Function and Upper Limb Deficit in Stroke With Motor Execution and Imagery: A Cross-Sectional Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Zhen-Zhen Ma; Jia-Jia Wu; Xu-Yun Hua; Mou-Xiong Zheng; Xiang-Xin Xing; Jie Ma; Si-Si Li; Chun-Lei Shan; Jian-Guang Xu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 7.  Understanding rostral-caudal auditory cortex contributions to auditory perception.

Authors:  Kyle Jasmin; César F Lima; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Shifted dynamic interactions between subcortical nuclei and inferior frontal gyri during response preparation in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  F Luise Metzger; Tibor Auer; Gunther Helms; Walter Paulus; Jens Frahm; Martin Sommer; Nicole E Neef
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.270

9.  Planum temporale asymmetry in people who stutter.

Authors:  Patricia M Gough; Emily L Connally; Peter Howell; David Ward; Jennifer Chesters; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.538

10.  Hemodynamics of speech production: An fNIRS investigation of children who stutter.

Authors:  B Walsh; F Tian; J A Tourville; M A Yücel; T Kuczek; A J Bostian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.