Literature DB >> 27542593

Hand trauma: A prospective observational study reporting diagnostic concordance in emergency hand trauma which supports centralised service improvements.

B H Miranda1, Z P Spilsbury2, A Rosala-Hallas3, S Cerovac2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hand injuries are common, contributing up to 30% of accident and emergency (A&E) attendances. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyse the pathological demographics of hand injuries in a level 1 trauma centre with a Hand Trauma Unit and direct A&E links, and compare clinical and intra-operative findings. The null hypothesis was that there would be no differences between clinical and intra-operative findings (100% diagnostic concordance).
METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for referrals during 2012. Referral diagnosis, additional pathologies found on clinical assessment and intra-operative findings were documented on a live database accessible from both the Hand Unit and associated operating theatres. Odds ratios were calculated using SAS.
RESULTS: Injuries (1526) were identified in 1308 patients included in the study. Diagnostic concordance between Hand Unit clinical examination and intra-operative findings was 92.5% ± 2.85% (mean ± SEM); this was lower for flexor tendon injuries (56.3%) because a greater number of additional pathologies were found intra-operatively (2.25 ± 0.10). This 'trend' was noted across multiple referral pathologies including phalangeal fractures (1.28 ± 0.02; 82.9%), lacerations (1.33 ± 0.04; 79.1%), extensor tendon injuries (1.30 ± 0.05; 87.8%) and dislocations (1.18 ± 0.05; 87.8%). Odds ratio analysis indicated a relationship between primary referral diagnoses that were more or less likely to be associated with additional injuries (p < 0.05); referral diagnoses of flexor tendon injuries and lacerations were most likely to be associated with additional injuries.
CONCLUSIONS: As hand injuries are a common presentation to A&amp;E departments, greater emphasis should be placed on training clinicians in the management of hand trauma. Our findings, coupled with the presented relevant literature reports, lead us to advocate that A&amp;E departments should move towards a system wherein links to specialist hand trauma services are in place; we hereby present useful data for hospitals implementing such services. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Hand trauma; Management; Service provision; Trauma centre

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27542593     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Epidemiology of hand injuries that presented to a tertiary care facility in Germany: a study including 435 patients.

Authors:  Nicholas Moellhoff; Veronika Throner; Konstantin Frank; Ashley Benne; Michaela Coenen; Riccardo E Giunta; Elisabeth M Haas-Lützenberger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  Risk Factors for a False-Negative Examination in Complete Upper Extremity Nerve Lacerations.

Authors:  Scott N Loewenstein; Reed Wulbrecht; Vanessa Leonhard; Sarah Sasor; Julia Cook; Lava Timsina; Joshua Adkinson
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-08-13

3.  Medico-legal risks associated to hand and wrist trauma.

Authors:  Dionysia Vasdeki; Sokratis E Varitimidis; Charalambos Chryssanthakis; Nikolaos Stefanou; Zoe H Dailiana
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-01-09

4.  WALANT: A Discussion of Indications, Impact, and Educational Requirements.

Authors:  Shahab Shahid; Noman Saghir; Reyan Saghir; Quillan Young-Sing; Benjamin H Miranda
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-07-30

5.  INCIDENCE OF ACUTE TRAUMA ON HAND AND WRIST: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.

Authors:  Giovanna Damm Raphael Junqueira; André Luiz Machado Lima; Robison Boni; Joelmar César DE Almeida; Rafael Souza Ribeiro; Leandro Azevedo DE Figueiredo
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.