Literature DB >> 27542080

Visual Attention Patterns of Women with Androphilic and Gynephilic Sexual Attractions.

Samantha J Dawson1, Katherine M Fretz1, Meredith L Chivers2.   

Abstract

Women who report exclusive sexual attractions to men (i.e., androphilia) exhibit gender-nonspecific patterns of sexual response-similar magnitude of genital response to both male and female targets. Interestingly, women reporting any degree of attraction to women (i.e., gynephilia) show significantly greater sexual responses to stimuli depicting female targets compared to male targets. At present, the mechanism(s) underlying these patterns are unknown. According to the information processing model (IPM), attentional processing of sexual cues initiates sexual responding; thus, attention to sexual cues may be one mechanism to explain the observed within-gender differences in specificity findings among women. The purpose of the present study was to examine patterns of initial and controlled visual attention among women with varying sexual attractions. We used eye tracking to assess visual attention to sexually preferred and nonpreferred cues in a sample of 164 women who differed in their degree of androphilia and gynephilia. We found that both exclusively and predominantly androphilic women showed gender-nonspecific patterns of initial attention. In contrast, ambiphilic (i.e., concurrent androphilia and gynephilia) and predominantly/exclusively gynephilic women oriented more quickly toward female targets. Controlled attention patterns mirrored patterns of self-reported sexual attractions for three of these four groups of women, such that gender-specific patterns of visual attention were found for androphilic and gynephilic women. Ambiphilic women looked significantly longer at female targets compared to male targets. These findings support predictions from the IPM and suggest that both initial and controlled attention to sexual cues may be mechanisms contributing to within-gender variation in sexual responding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye tracking; Gender specificity; Information processing model; Sexual arousal; Sexual orientation; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27542080     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-016-0825-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  9 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Paraphilic Interests Among Women Who Sexually Offend.

Authors:  Katrina N Bouchard; Heather M Moulden; Martin L Lalumière
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Martin L Lalumière; Megan L Sawatsky; Samantha J Dawson; Kelly D Suschinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-02-05

3.  Cognitive processing of sexual cues in asexual individuals and heterosexual women with desire/arousal difficulties.

Authors:  Natalie B Brown; Diana Peragine; Doug P VanderLaan; Alan Kingstone; Lori A Brotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effect of static versus dynamic stimuli on visual processing of sexual cues in androphilic women and gynephilic men.

Authors:  Samantha J Dawson; Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Sexual Attraction to Both Genders in Ambiphilic Men: Evidence from Implicit Cognitions.

Authors:  Robert J Snowden; Ellen Fitton; Aimee McKinnon; Nicola S Gray
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-11-05

6.  Canadian undergraduate men's visual attention to cisgender women, cisgender men, and feminine trans individuals.

Authors:  Lanna J Petterson; Paul L Vasey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Asexuality vs. sexual interest/arousal disorder: Examining group differences in initial attention to sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Julia Bradshaw; Natalie Brown; Alan Kingstone; Lori Brotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Female Genital Arousal: A Focus on How Rather than Why.

Authors:  Marieke Dewitte
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-07-15

9.  Understanding heterosexual women's erotic flexibility: the role of attention in sexual evaluations and neural responses to sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Janna A Dickenson; Lisa Diamond; Jace B King; Kay Jenson; Jeffrey S Anderson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.436

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.