IMPORTANCE: Assessment of PD-L1 (programmed cell death 1 ligand 1) expression by immunohistochemical analysis has been used as a predictive diagnostic test to identify responders and guide treatment in trials of the PD-1 (programmed cell death 1) axis inhibitors. The definition of PD-L1 positive lacks standardization, and prediction of response by immunohistochemical analysis is additionally limited by the subjective nature of this technique. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether PD-L1 antibody reagents are interchangeable by quantitatively comparing the expression of the PD-L1 protein. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this immunohistochemistry standardization study, 30 randomly selected cases of lung cancer resected from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2009, were obtained from Yale Pathology Archives with a range of expression of PD-L1. To test for protein measurement, rather than clinical utility, a PD-L1 index tissue microarray, including cell line and tissue controls, was used. The results were then validated on a commercially available, genetically defined PD-L1 engineered cell line array with a range of controlled protein-expressing cell lines using 6 monoclonal antibodies (SP142, E1L3N, 9A11, SP263, 22c3, and 28-8). Protein levels were measured by quantitative immunofluorescence and quantitative chromogenic assessment. Data analysis was performed from September 2015 through May 2016. RESULTS: Concordance between 4 antibodies revealed regression for tumor tissue cores (R2 = 0.42-0.91) and cell line cores (R2 = 0.83-0.97) by quantitative immunofluorescence in the PD-L1 index tissue microarray. All 6 antibodies had high levels of concordance (R2 = 0.76-0.99) when using chromogenic staining in isogenic cell lines. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Because the antibodies are highly concordant, these results suggest that assays based on the use of these antibodies could yield concordant results. They further suggest that previously described differences in PD-L1 expression in tissue are independent of the antibody used and likely attributable to tumor heterogeneity, assay- or platform-specific variables, or other factors.
IMPORTANCE: Assessment of PD-L1 (programmed cell death 1 ligand 1) expression by immunohistochemical analysis has been used as a predictive diagnostic test to identify responders and guide treatment in trials of the PD-1 (programmed cell death 1) axis inhibitors. The definition of PD-L1 positive lacks standardization, and prediction of response by immunohistochemical analysis is additionally limited by the subjective nature of this technique. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether PD-L1 antibody reagents are interchangeable by quantitatively comparing the expression of the PD-L1 protein. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this immunohistochemistry standardization study, 30 randomly selected cases of lung cancer resected from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2009, were obtained from Yale Pathology Archives with a range of expression of PD-L1. To test for protein measurement, rather than clinical utility, a PD-L1 index tissue microarray, including cell line and tissue controls, was used. The results were then validated on a commercially available, genetically defined PD-L1 engineered cell line array with a range of controlled protein-expressing cell lines using 6 monoclonal antibodies (SP142, E1L3N, 9A11, SP263, 22c3, and 28-8). Protein levels were measured by quantitative immunofluorescence and quantitative chromogenic assessment. Data analysis was performed from September 2015 through May 2016. RESULTS: Concordance between 4 antibodies revealed regression for tumor tissue cores (R2 = 0.42-0.91) and cell line cores (R2 = 0.83-0.97) by quantitative immunofluorescence in the PD-L1 index tissue microarray. All 6 antibodies had high levels of concordance (R2 = 0.76-0.99) when using chromogenic staining in isogenic cell lines. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Because the antibodies are highly concordant, these results suggest that assays based on the use of these antibodies could yield concordant results. They further suggest that previously described differences in PD-L1 expression in tissue are independent of the antibody used and likely attributable to tumor heterogeneity, assay- or platform-specific variables, or other factors.
Authors: Edward B Garon; Naiyer A Rizvi; Rina Hui; Natasha Leighl; Ani S Balmanoukian; Joseph Paul Eder; Amita Patnaik; Charu Aggarwal; Matthew Gubens; Leora Horn; Enric Carcereny; Myung-Ju Ahn; Enriqueta Felip; Jong-Seok Lee; Matthew D Hellmann; Omid Hamid; Jonathan W Goldman; Jean-Charles Soria; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Ruth Z Rutledge; Jin Zhang; Jared K Lunceford; Reshma Rangwala; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Charlotte Roach; Kenneth Emancipator; Leena Gandhi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Janis M Taube; Alison Klein; Julie R Brahmer; Haiying Xu; Xiaoyu Pan; Jung H Kim; Lieping Chen; Drew M Pardoll; Suzanne L Topalian; Robert A Anders Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Jean-Charles Soria; Marcin Kowanetz; Gregg D Fine; Omid Hamid; Michael S Gordon; Jeffery A Sosman; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Scott N Gettinger; Holbrook E K Kohrt; Leora Horn; Donald P Lawrence; Sandra Rost; Maya Leabman; Yuanyuan Xiao; Ahmad Mokatrin; Hartmut Koeppen; Priti S Hegde; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vamsidhar Velcheti; Kurt A Schalper; Daniel E Carvajal; Valsamo K Anagnostou; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Mario Sznol; Roy S Herbst; Scott N Gettinger; Lieping Chen; David L Rimm Journal: Lab Invest Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 5.662
Authors: Joseph McLaughlin; Gang Han; Kurt A Schalper; Daniel Carvajal-Hausdorf; Vasiliki Pelekanou; Jamaal Rehman; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Roy Herbst; Patricia LoRusso; David L Rimm Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Yuting Liu; Jon Zugazagoitia; Fahad Shabbir Ahmed; Brian S Henick; Scott N Gettinger; Roy S Herbst; Kurt A Schalper; David L Rimm Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Douglas B Johnson; Jennifer Bordeaux; Ju Young Kim; Christine Vaupel; David L Rimm; Thai H Ho; Richard W Joseph; Adil I Daud; Robert M Conry; Elizabeth M Gaughan; Leonel F Hernandez-Aya; Anastasios Dimou; Pauline Funchain; James Smithy; John S Witte; Svetlana B McKee; Jennifer Ko; John M Wrangle; Bashar Dabbas; Shabnam Tangri; Jelveh Lameh; Jeffrey Hall; Joseph Markowitz; Justin M Balko; Naveen Dakappagari Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Joel C Sunshine; Peter L Nguyen; Genevieve J Kaunitz; Tricia R Cottrell; Sneha Berry; Jessica Esandrio; Haiying Xu; Aleksandra Ogurtsova; Karen B Bleich; Toby C Cornish; Evan J Lipson; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Amber J Giles; Shuyu Hao; Michelle Padget; Hua Song; Wei Zhang; John Lynes; Victoria Sanchez; Yang Liu; Jinkyu Jung; Xiaoyu Cao; Rika Fujii; Randy Jensen; David Gillespie; Jeffrey Schlom; Mark R Gilbert; Edjah K Nduom; Chunzhang Yang; John H Lee; Patrick Soon-Shiong; James W Hodge; Deric M Park Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2019-10-17
Authors: Maria Tretiakova; Regan Fulton; Masha Kocherginsky; Thomas Long; Cigdem Ussakli; Tatjana Antic; Allen Gown Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-12-22 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Toni K Choueiri; Sabina Signoretti; Abdallah Flaifel; Wanling Xie; David A Braun; Miriam Ficial; Ziad Bakouny; Amin H Nassar; Rebecca B Jennings; Bernard Escudier; Daniel J George; Robert J Motzer; Michael J Morris; Thomas Powles; Evelyn Wang; Ying Huang; Gordon J Freeman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Marie Colombe Agahozo; Mieke R van Bockstal; Floris H Groenendijk; Thierry P P van den Bosch; Pieter J Westenend; Carolien H M van Deurzen Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 7.842