| Literature DB >> 27541591 |
Marco E Allaix1, Jason M Long1, Marco G Patti1.
Abstract
The last 25 years have witnessed a steady increase in the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, it is unclear which the optimal minimally invasive approach is: totally minimally invasive or hybrid (laparoscopic assisted or thoracoscopic assisted)? The current evidence from nonrandomized control trials suggests that hybrid laparoscopic-assisted esophagectomy couples the benefits of laparoscopy and the advantages of thoracotomy, leading to reduced surgical trauma without jeopardizing survival compared with open esophagectomy. Compromised blood supply and tension on the anastomosis are two of the main factors that lead to anastomotic leakage. Recent studies have shown that a side-to-side mechanical intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is associated with low anastomotic complications. This article discusses surgical aspects and outcomes of hybrid laparoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Entities:
Keywords: anastomotic leak; esophageal cancer; esophagogastric anastomosis; hybrid esophagectomy; minimally invasive esophagectomy; thoracotomy
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27541591 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.29011.mea
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ISSN: 1092-6429 Impact factor: 1.878