| Literature DB >> 2754123 |
M R Starling1, D G Montgomery, R A Walsh.
Abstract
To determine whether the slopes of the single beat maximal pressure (stress)/volume ratios are sensitive to changes in loading conditions in humans, 16 patients without cardiac disease were studied with simultaneous micromanometer-determined left ventricular pressures and biplane contrast cineangiograms under control conditions and during methoxamine and nitroprusside infusions. Left ventricular volumes were calculated with use of a Simpson's rule algorithm, wall thickness was obtained iteratively, and both midwall circumferential and meridional stresses were computed frame by frame. The maximal pressure/volume and both circumferential and meridional maximal stress/volume ratios were calculated using a single beat from each loading condition assuming a zero volume-axis intercept. Mean left ventricular systolic pressure increased 47% during the methoxamine infusion and decreased 22% during the nitroprusside infusion compared with control (p less than 0.001 for both). Despite these changes in left ventricular systolic pressure, heart rate was eliminated as a confounding variable by right atrial pacing; and mean maximal rate of change of left ventricular pressure [(+)dP/dtmax] and rate of change at developed pressure 40 mm Hg [(+)(dP/dt) per DP40] values did not differ significantly. Mean single beat maximal pressure/volume ratios also did not differ significantly among the three loading conditions. In contrast, mean single beat circumferential and meridional maximal stress/volume ratios were 3.15 +/- 1.83 and 1.40 +/- 0.82 g/cm2 per ml at control; they increased to 4.47 +/- 2.44 and 2.21 +/- 1.25 g/cm2 per ml during the methoxamine infusion (p less than 0.001 for both), and they decreased during the nitroprusside infusion to 2.58 +/- 1.47 and 1.14 +/- 0.57 g/cm2 per ml (p less than 0.05 and p less than 0.01, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1989 PMID: 2754123 DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90184-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol ISSN: 0735-1097 Impact factor: 24.094