Literature DB >> 27540739

Updated Rice Kinase Database RKD 2.0: enabling transcriptome and functional analysis of rice kinase genes.

Anil Kumar Nalini Chandran1, Yo-Han Yoo1, Peijian Cao2, Rita Sharma3, Manoj Sharma4, Christopher Dardick5, Pamela C Ronald6,7, Ki-Hong Jung8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protein kinases catalyze the transfer of a phosphate moiety from a phosphate donor to the substrate molecule, thus playing critical roles in cell signaling and metabolism. Although plant genomes contain more than 1000 genes that encode kinases, knowledge is limited about the function of each of these kinases. A major obstacle that hinders progress towards kinase characterization is functional redundancy. To address this challenge, we previously developed the rice kinase database (RKD) that integrated omics-scale data within a phylogenetics context.
RESULTS: An updated version of rice kinase database (RKD) that contains metadata derived from NCBI GEO expression datasets has been developed. RKD 2.0 facilitates in-depth transcriptomic analyses of kinase-encoding genes in diverse rice tissues and in response to biotic and abiotic stresses and hormone treatments. We identified 261 kinases specifically expressed in particular tissues, 130 that are significantly up- regulated in response to biotic stress, 296 in response to abiotic stress, and 260 in response to hormones. Based on this update and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) analysis, we estimated that 19 out of 26 genes characterized through loss-of-function studies confer dominant functions. These were selected because they either had paralogous members with PCC values of <0.5 or had no paralog.
CONCLUSION: Compared with the previous version of RKD, RKD 2.0 enables more effective estimations of functional redundancy or dominance because it uses comprehensive expression profiles rather than individual profiles. The integrated analysis of RKD with PCC establishes a single platform for researchers to select rice kinases for functional analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional redundancy; Meta-analysis; Mutant analysis; Pearson correlation coefficient; Phylogenomics; Rice kinase database; Transcriptome

Year:  2016        PMID: 27540739      PMCID: PMC4991984          DOI: 10.1186/s12284-016-0106-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rice (N Y)        ISSN: 1939-8425            Impact factor:   4.783


Background

Protein kinases are involved in diverse cellular and biological processes. Elucidation of their roles is limited; functions for only 61 kinases in rice (Oryza sativa) have been ascribed (Yamamoto et al. 2012). This subset represents approximately 4.1 % of all kinase genes in that genome. Since sequencing of the entire rice genome was completed in 2005 (IRGSP 2005), diverse omics datasets have been generated that include genome-wide expression analysis using microarrays as well as RNA-seq, re-sequencing of 3000 rice accessions, protein–protein interactomes, gene regulatory networks, and metabolic pathways. Because these databases use very different platforms for formatting, it has been a challenge to integrate publicly available datasets to facilitate functional genomics studies (Chandran and Jung 2014; Alexandrov et al. 2015). Functional redundancy is a significant obstacle to the identification of gene functions. Completed whole-genome sequences enable researchers to estimate the extent of functional redundancy due to gene duplications. From 20 to 60 % of the rice genome is tandemly or segmentally duplicated (Itoh et al. 2007; Lin et al. 2008). In addition, 21,403 proteins in rice have been assigned to 3856 paralogous protein family groups, thus demonstrating that more than 50 % of all rice genes annotated to non-transposable element (non-TE) gene models have functional redundancy because of their paralogous relationships (Lin et al. 2008). However, not all paralogous genes have such redundancy. Knock-out mutant analysis has identified light response-defective phenotypes in T-DNA insertional mutant lines for nine gene family members that are predominantly expressed under high illumination (Jung et al. 2008). In addition, 79 of 127 ubiquitously expressed genes which have been functionally characterized through loss-of-function studies belong to gene families (Jung et al. 2015). In both cases, functional dominance of the characterized genes within a particular family has been readily estimated through phylogenomics analyses that integrate metadata from diverse expression datasets within a phylogenetics context (Jung et al. 2015). To date, six phylogenomics databases have been developed for rice. These include kinase, glycosyltransferase, glycoside hydrolase, transcription factor, transporter, and cytochrome p450 databases (Jung et al. 2015). Rice kinase database (RKD) was the first of these to be established, and it has provided a basic framework for all others (Dardick et al. 2007; Jung et al. 2010). Application of RKD in facilitating functional genomic studies was previously demonstrated. For example, phylogenomics approach played a major role in the identification of a set of MAPK, MAPKK, and MAPKKK genes that are part of same signaling cascades, and in predicting the regulatory model of a light-inducible kinase gene (Jung et al. 2010). One unique feature of RKD compared with other databases is an option to integrate protein–protein interaction network data based on yeast two-hybrid or tandem affinity purification tagging analyses (Dardick et al. 2007). A large set of this integrated transcriptomic data, retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (NCBI GEO; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/. accessed on November 21, 2015), is a main provider of diverse biological information about interesting kinase genes for further functional studies (Cao et al. 2008; Jung et al. 2010). The current format of those databases for integrating transcriptome data has proven cumbersome because users must mine data from a list of datasets within NCBI GEO. However, Genevestigator, RiceXPro, and Rice Oligonucleotide Array Database (ROAD; www.ricearray.org/, accessed on December 2, 2015) have recently integrated these meta-expression data through classification and reconstruction to enhance accessibility (Zimmermann et al. 2008; Cao et al. 2012; Sato et al. 2013). Here, we describe RKD 2.0, an updated RKD that integrates metadata from genes expressed in particular tissues and in response to abiotic/biotic stresses and hormone treatments. Using these data, a genome-wide meta-analysis of expression patterns for all predicted rice kinases have been performed and identified kinase-encoding genes with distinct expression patterns. Also, steps involved in the construction and application of RKD 2.0 has been discussed.

Results and discussion

Updated features of RKD 2.0

The earlier version, RKD, presented phylogenomics data for 1508 kinases comprising 65 subfamilies, and a group of kinase genes that could not be assigned to any of those subfamilies (Dardick et al. 2007; Jung et al. 2010). Because that version utilized all gene models (splicing variants), the integrated transcriptome information showed redundant expression data for multiple models produced from a particular locus. However, for the current version, we selected one representative model per locus based on the information available from rice genome annotation project (RGAP) database (Ouyang et al. 2007) that could provide a simplified and comprehensive visualization of the integrated data. Likewise, instead of taking individual datasets from NCBI GEO (Barrett et al. 2011), Affymetrix-based anatomical metadata (ROAD; http://www.ricearray.org/expression/experiment_search.php, accessed on December 2, 2015), used in ROAD (Cao et al. 2012) have been integrated within the phylogenic tree context. Furthermore, meta-analysis with diverse datasets of genes that are expressed in response to biotic and abiotic stresses as well as hormones treatment was performed. Unlike the average normalized intensity data used for an anatomical meta-expression database, log2 fold-change data for treatment versus control have been introduced. Differential expression in response to five pathogens (Magnaporthe grisea, MG; Magnaporthe oryzae, MO; rice stripe virus, RSV; Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, Xoo; and the brown plant hopper, BPH), in addition to five abiotic stresses (drought, salt, cold, heat, and submergence) and six hormones (abscisic acid, ABA; brassinolide, BL; gibberellic acid, GA; indole-3-acetic acid, IAA; trans-zeatin, tZ; and jasmonic acid, JA) were also analyzed. The results are presented in Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5: Tables S1-S5. The expression data used for meta-analysis from anatomical tissues and in stress responses were based on Affymetrix array data downloaded from the NCBI GEO (Cao et al. 2012; Zimmermann et al. 2008). For hormone responses, those expression data were based on Agilent 44 K arrays (GSE39429) (NCBI GEO; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE39429, accessed on November 21, 2015) (Sato et al. 2013). As an alternative platform for meta-analysis of microarray data, RNASeq data of anatomical and abiotic stress treated samples were integrated to the database (Secco et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2015). All of these updated features are available in the new rice kinase database (RKD 2.0; http://ricephylogenomics-khu.org/kinase/index.php, accessed on February 20, 2016).

Meta-analysis of expression data available for kinase genes with known functions

Using information from OGRO, the Overview of Functionally Characterized Genes in Rice online database (OGRO; http://qtaro.abr.affrc.go.jp/ogro/table. Accessed 20 October 2015) (Yamamoto et al. 2012), 61 RGAP loci related to kinases that have been functionally characterized were retrieved. Among them, function of a subset of kinase genes were related to more than one trait. Thus, 61 kinases are associated with 124 traits. Although these genes were broadly classified as conferring morphological traits (35 genes), physiological traits (27), stress responses resistance (59), or other biological functions (3) (Table 1), 63 of them are associated with multiple functions. Among those for morphological traits, 10 genes each target for culm leaves and dwarfism. Another three genes each are related to panicle/flower formation and seeds, four to roots and five to seedling development. The major physiological effects of rice mutants lead to sterility (6 genes), indicating that the genes in this category are important for fertilization and embryo development. The physiological-trait classification also includes four genes related to source activity, six for flowering, two for eating quality, and one for seed production. In that group, mutations of three genes are attributed to germination dormancy. In addition to the panicle-dependent effect, physiological effects can be observed in the roots (two genes) and culm leaves (one gene). Mutation of one gene causes lethality. The stress-response classification is subdivided into genes that function in biotic stresses, abiotic stresses, and resistance to mechanical stresses such as lodging. With regard to biotic stresses, 15 genes have roles in blast resistance, eight including Xa21 gene involved in bacterial blight resistance (Song et al. 1995) , function of a gene associated with insect resistance and one in resistance to other diseases. For abiotic stresses, eight genes are associated with drought, 15 with salinity, six with chilling, and another five with other types of stresses. Analysis of previously characterized genes indicates that kinases plays diverse role in physiology and growth of rice plants.
Table 1

Functional information for kinase genes with known functions

Type of meta-expressionCharacter_majorLOC_idGene nameGene symbolMethodcharacter_minorDOI reference
IAAMorphological traitLOC_Os01g52050.1dwarf 61d61MutantCulm leaf10.1105/tpc.12.9.1591
Anther/PollenMorphological traitLOC_Os02g58610.1N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase IGnTIMutantCulm leaf10.1111/tpj.12087
Root, BPHMorphological traitLOC_Os06g50920.1increased leaf angle1ila1MutantCulm leaf 10.1105/tpc.111.093419
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g05980.1leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase1LRK1OverexpressionCulm leaf 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00428.x
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g05980.1Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase 1LRK1OverexpressionCulm leaf 10.1007/s10529-012-1054-9
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g40860.1Low Temperature Growth 1LTG1OthersCulm leaf 10.1111/tpj.12487
Morphological traitLOC_Os08g07760.1OsBAK1OsBAK1KnockdownCulm leaf 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00444.x
Morphological traitLOC_Os05g40770.1Leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinasesOsRPK1Knockdown OverexpressionCulm leaf 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.01.003
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g32610.2CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE-RESPONSE2OsCTR2MutantCulm leaf 10.1093/jxb/ert272
Morphological traitLOC_Os04g48760.1xiaoxiaoMutantCulm leaf 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04877.x
IAAMorphological traitLOC_Os01g52050.1dwarf 61d61MutantDwarf 10.1105/tpc.12.9.1591
Anther/PollenMorphological traitLOC_Os02g58610.1N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase IGnTIMutantDwarf 10.1111/tpj.12087
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g05980.1leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase1LRK1OverexpressionDwarf 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00428.x
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g05980.1Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase 1LRK1OverexpressionDwarf 10.1007/s10529-012-1054-9
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g40860.1Low Temperature Growth 1LTG1OthersDwarf 10.1111/tpj.12487
Leaf/Flag leaf/Shoot, ABAMorphological traitLOC_Os02g36570.1activity of bc1 complex 1–2OsABC1-2MutantDwarf 10.1016/j.gene.2012.02.017
Morphological traitLOC_Os08g07760.1OsBAK1OsBAK1KnockdownDwarf 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00444.x
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g03410.1Ca2 + −dependent protein kinase 4OsCPK4KnockdownDwarf 10.1104/pp.113.230268
Morphological traitLOC_Os05g40770.1Leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinasesOsRPK1Knockdown OverexpressionDwarf 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.01.003
Morphological traitLOC_Os04g48760.1xiaoxiaoMutantDwarf 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04877.x
Morphological traitLOC_Os06g50340.1FLORAL ORGAN NUMBER1fon1MutantPanicle flower 10.1242/dev.01441
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g05980.1leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase1LRK1OverexpressionPanicle flower 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00428.x
SAM/Panicle, IAAMorphological traitLOC_Os12g42020.1pinoidOsPIDOverexpressionPanicle flower 10.1093/pcp/pcm024
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g14120.1defective in outer cell layer specification 1Docs1MutantRoot 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04824.x
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g40860.1Casein Kinase IOsCKI1KnockdownRoot 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01866.x
SAM/Panicle, IAAMorphological traitLOC_Os12g42020.1pinoidOsPIDOverexpressionRoot 10.1093/pcp/pcm024
Morphological traitLOC_Os05g40770.1Leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinasesOsRPK1Knockdown OverexpressionRoot 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.01.003
Leaf/Flag leaf/Shoot, ABAMorphological traitLOC_Os02g36570.1activity of bc1 complex 1–2OsABC1-2MutantSeed 10.1016/j.gene.2012.02.017
Ubiquitous, JAMorphological traitLOC_Os03g03660.1calcium-dependent protein kinase 1OsCDPK1Knockdown OverexpressionSeed 10.1007/s11103-012-0006-z
Morphological traitLOC_Os04g48760.1xiaoxiaoMutantSeed 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04877.x
Ubiquitous, JAMorphological traitLOC_Os03g03660.1calcium-dependent protein kinase 1OsCDPK1Knockdown OverexpressionShoot seedling 10.1007/s11103-012-0006-z
tZMorphological traitLOC_Os03g20380.1Calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinases 31oscipk31MutantShoot seedling 10.1007/s10059-010-0084-1
JAMorphological traitLOC_Os08g42750.1Calcium-dependent protein kinase21OsCPK21OverexpressionShoot seedling 10.1007/s11103-010-9717-1
Morphological traitLOC_Os02g32610.2CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE-RESPONSE2OsCTR2MutantShoot seedling 10.1093/jxb/ert272
Morphological traitLOC_Os05g45420.1Snf1-related protein kinases 1asnrk1aMutantShoot seedling 10.1105/tpc.105.037887
SAM/Panicle, IAAPhysiological traitLOC_Os07g32480.1Bub1-Related Kinase 1BRK1MutantSterility 10.1105/tpc.112.105874
RSV, IAAPhysiological traitLOC_Os01g68870.1MULTIPLE SPOROCYTE 1msp1MutantSterility 10.1105/tpc.012401
RootPhysiological traitLOC_Os07g05620.1CBL (Calcineurin B-Like) Interacting Protein Kinase 23OsCIPK23Knockdown OverexpressionSterility 10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60073-9
JAPhysiological traitLOC_Os09g38850.1DEFECT IN EARLY EMBRYO SAC1OsDEES1KnockdownSterility 10.1104/pp.112.203943
Physiological traitLOC_Os07g08000.1NIMA-related kinase 3OsNek3OverexpressionSterility 10.1093/pcp/pcp026
Physiological traitLOC_Os04g48760.1xiaoxiaoMutantSterility 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04877.x
Anther/PollenPhysiological traitLOC_Os02g58610.1N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase IGnTIMutantSource activity 10.1111/tpj.12087
Leaf/Flag leaf/Shoot, ABAPhysiological traitLOC_Os02g36570.1activity of bc1 complex 1–2OsABC1-2MutantSource activity 10.1016/j.gene.2012.02.017
Leaf/Flag leaf/ShootPhysiological traitLOC_Os05g40180.1A serine/threo- nine protein kinase 8OsSTN8MutantSource activity 10.1111/tpj.12331
Physiological traitLOC_Os11g01140.1Phototropin1aphot1aMutantSource activity 10.1007/s11103-008-9442-1
Physiological traitLOC_Os03g57940.1earlier flowering1el1MutantFlowering 10.1038/emboj.2010.75
Physiological traitLOC_Os03g57940.1Heading date 16Hd16Natural variationFlowering 10.1111/tpj.12268
Physiological traitLOC_Os03g55389.1heading date 6Hd6Natural variationFlowering 10.1073/pnas.111136798
Physiological traitLOC_Os02g40860.1Low Temperature Growth 1LTG1OthersFlowering 10.1111/tpj.12487
Physiological traitLOC_Os03g56270.1NUTRITION RESPONSE AND ROOT GROWTH bNRRbKnockdownFlowering 10.1093/mp/sss157
Physiological traitLOC_Os02g32610.2CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE-RESPONSE2OsCTR2MutantFlowering 10.1093/jxb/ert272
Physiological traitLOC_Os10g39420.1seed-specific protein kinaseSPKKnockdownEating quality 10.1093/pcp/pch122
Physiological traitLOC_Os10g39420.1seed-specific protein kinaseSPKKnockdownEating quality 10.1105/tpc.010454
tZPhysiological traitLOC_Os03g20380.1Calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinases 31oscipk31MutantGermination dormancy 10.1007/s10059-010-0084-1
Physiological traitLOC_Os04g12540.1lectin receptor kinaseOslecRKKnockdownGermination dormancy 10.1111/tpj.12328
Physiological traitLOC_Os05g45420.1Snf1-related protein kinases 1asnrk1aMutantGermination dormancy 10.1105/tpc.105.037887
Physiological traitLOC_Os05g40770.1Leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinasesOsRPK1Knockdown OverexpressionSeed 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.01.003
Physiological traitLOC_Os05g41090.1Ca2 + calmodulin-de-pendent protein kinaseOsCCaMKMutantRoot 10.1128/AEM.03646-13.
Physiological traitLOC_Os02g03410.1Ca2 + −dependent protein kinase 4OsCPK4OverexpressionRoot 10.1104/pp.113.230268
RootPhysiological traitLOC_Os05g40770.1Leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinasesOsRPK1Knockdown OverexpressionCulm leaf 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.01.003
Physiological traitLOC_Os02g40860.1hybrid breakdown 2hbd2Natural variationLethality 10.1007/s00438-010-0514-y
Physiological traitLOC_Os02g05480.1TEY-type rice mitogen-activated protein kinase 3OsMPK3OthersOthers 10.1007/s00299-014-1620-9
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os09g36320.1BROAD-SPECTRUM RESISTANCE 1BSR1OverexpressionBlast resistance 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00568.x
Heat, JAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os07g22710.1calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) 18CPK18KnockdownBlast resistance 10.1105/tpc.114.126441
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os10g40100.1receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase geneNRRBKnockdownBlast resistance 10.1007/s11033-014-3069-x
BPHResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g06410.1accelerated cell death and resistance 1OsACDR1Knockdown OverexpressionBlast resistance 10.1007/s10059-009-0161-5
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g12730.1blast resistance-related 1OsBRR1Knockdown OverexpressionBlast resistance 10.1007/s00425-009-0951-1
JAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os08g42580.1chitin elicitor receptor kinase1OsCERK1KnockdownBlast resistance 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04324.x
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g57450.1Calcium-dependent protein kinase 10OsCPK10OverexpressionBlast resistance 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.10.004
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g47300.1Calcium-dependent protein kinase 12OsCPK12MutantBlast resistance 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04766.x
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g12540.1lectin receptor kinaseOslecRKKnockdownBlast resistance 10.1111/tpj.12328
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g17700.1Mitogen-activated protein kinase5OsMAPK5Knockdown OverexpressionBlast resistance 10.1105/tpc.008714
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os02g05480.1TEY-type rice mitogen-activated protein kinase 3OsMPK3OthersBlast resistance 10.1007/s00299-014-1620-9
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g41160.1oxidative signal inducible 1OsOxi1OverexpressionBlast resistance 10.1093/pcp/pcq132
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os01g65230.13-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1OsPdk1MutantBlast resistance 10.1093/pcp/pcq167
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g38480.1somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase 1OsSERK1OverexpressionBlast resistance 10.1007/s00425-005-1534-4
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os06g29810.1Pi-d2Pi-d2Natural variationBlast resistance 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02739.x
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os09g36320.1BROAD-SPECTRUM RESISTANCE 1BSR1OverexpressionBacterial blight resistance 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00568.x
BPHResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g06410.1enhanced disease resistance 1OsEDR1MutantBacterial blight resistance 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02219.x
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g12540.1lectin receptor kinaseOslecRKKnockdownBacterial blight resistance 10.1111/tpj.12328
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g17700.1Mitogen-activated protein kinase5OsMAPK5Knockdown OverexpressionBacterial blight resistance 10.1105/tpc.008714
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os10g38950.1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphatase6OsMPK6MutantBacterial blight resistance 10.1007/s00425-007-0541-z
Cold, JAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g41160.1oxidative signal inducible 1OsOxi1OverexpressionBacterial blight resistance 10.1093/pcp/pcq132
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os01g65230.13-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1OsPdk1MutantBacterial blight resistance 10.1093/pcp/pcq167
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os11g35500.1Xa21Xa21Natural variationBacterial blight resistance 10.1126/science.270.5243.1804
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g17700.1Mitogen-activated protein kinase5OsMAPK5Knockdown OverexpressionOther disease resistance 10.1105/tpc.008714
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g12540.1lectin receptor kinaseOslecRKKnockdownInsect resistance 10.1111/tpj.12328
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os02g50970.1drought-hypersensitive mutant1dsm1MutantDrought tolerance 10.1104/pp.109.149856
JAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g03660.1calcium-dependent protein kinase 1OsCDPK1Knockdown OverexpressionDrought tolerance 10.1007/s11103-012-0006-z
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g49510.1calcium-dependent protein kinase 7OsCDPK7OverexpressionDrought tolerance 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00787.x
Drought/Salt, M. grisea, ABAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os01g55450.1calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase12OsCIPK12OverexpressionDrought tolerance 10.1104/pp.107.101295
Cold, M. oryzaeResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os02g03410.1Ca2 + −dependent protein kinase 4OsCPK4KnockdownDrought tolerance 10.1104/pp.113.230268
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os01g10840.1glycogen synthase kinase3-like gene 1OsGSK1MutantDrought tolerance 10.1007/s11103-007-9213-4
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g17700.1Mitogen-activated protein kinase5OsMAPK5Knockdown OverexpressionDrought tolerance 10.1105/tpc.008714
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os06g03970.1stress-induced protein kinase gene 1sik1MutantDrought tolerance 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04146.x
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g49510.1calcium-dependent protein kinase 7OsCDPK7OverexpressionSalinity tolerance 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00787.x
BPHResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os11g02240.1calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase15OsCIPK15OverexpressionSalinity tolerance 10.1104/pp.107.101295
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os07g05620.1CBL (Calcineurin B-Like) Interacting Protein Kinase 23OsCIPK23Knockdown OverexpressionSalinity tolerance 10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60073-9
tZResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g20380.1Calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinases 31oscipk31MutantSalinity tolerance 10.1007/s10059-010-0084-1
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g47300.1Calcium-dependent protein kinase 12OsCPK12MutantSalinity tolerance 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04766.x
JAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os08g42750.1Calcium-dependent protein kinase21OsCPK21OverexpressionSalinity tolerance 10.1007/s11103-010-9717-1
Cold, M. oryzaeResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os02g03410.1Ca2 + −dependent protein kinase 4OsCPK4KnockdownSalinity tolerance 10.1104/pp.113.230268
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os01g10840.1glycogen synthase kinase3-like gene 1OsGSK1MutantSalinity tolerance 10.1007/s11103-007-9213-4
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os02g05480.1Mitogen-activated protein kinase33OsMAPK33OverexpressionSalinity tolerance 10.1007/s12038-011-9002-8
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g17700.1Mitogen-activated protein kinase5OsMAPK5Knockdown OverexpressionSalinity tolerance 10.1105/tpc.008714
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os06g05520.1mitogen-activated protein kinase kinaseOsMKK1 (MAPKK)KnockdownSalinity tolerance 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.08.007
ABAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os01g64970.1SNF1-type serine-threonine protein kinase4SAPK4OverexpressionSalinity tolerance 10.1186/1471-2229-8-49
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os06g03970.1stress-induced protein kinase gene 1sik1MutantSalinity tolerance 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04146.x
JAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os02g42780.1Salt Intolerance 1SIT1Knockdown OverexpressionSalinity tolerance 10.1105/tpc.114.125187
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g44900.1Salt Intolerance 2SIT2KnockdownSalinity tolerance 10.1105/tpc.114.125187
JAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g03660.1calcium-dependent protein kinase 13CDPK13OverexpressionCold tolerance 10.1007/s00438-007-0220-6
JAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g03660.1calcium-dependent protein kinase 13OsCDPK13OverexpressionCold tolerance 10.1007/s11103-004-1178-y
tZResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g20380.1calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase03OsCIPK03OverexpressionCold tolerance 10.1104/pp.107.101295
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os01g10840.1glycogen synthase kinase3-like gene 1OsGSK1MutantCold tolerance 10.1007/s11103-007-9213-4
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os03g17700.1Mitogen-activated protein kinase5OsMAPK5Knockdown OverexpressionCold tolerance 10.1105/tpc.008714
Cold, M. oryzae, IAAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os01g32660.1Oryza sativa MAPK kinase 6OsMKK6OverexpressionCold tolerance 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.11.012
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os02g50970.1drought-hypersensitive mutant1dsm1MutantOther stress resistance 10.1104/pp.109.149856
ABAResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os02g36570.1activity of bc1 complex 1–2OsABC1-2MutantOther stress resistance 10.1016/j.gene.2012.02.017
HeatResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os05g41090.1Doesn’t make infection 3OsDMI3MutantOther stress resistance 10.1093/mp/sss068
Resistance or ToleranceLOC_Os01g10840.1glycogen synthase kinase3-like gene 1OsGSK1MutantOther stress resistance 10.1007/s11103-007-9213-4
ColdResistance or ToleranceLOC_Os04g41160.1oxidative signal inducible 1OsOxi1OverexpressionOther stress resistance 10.1093/pcp/pcq132
tZOthersLOC_Os08g34380.1commissural vein excessive1coe1MutantOthers 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04250.x
ColdOthersLOC_Os08g40170.1plant-specific cyclin-dependent kinase2;1Orysa;CDKB2;1KnockdownOthers 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04847.x
Cold, JAOthersLOC_Os06g06090.1Mitogen-activated protein kinase6OsMAPK6KnockdownOthers 10.1104/pp.104.057414
Functional information for kinase genes with known functions

Functional assignment of rice kinase genes using expression data

To assess the biological functions of rice kinases, meta-expression profiles generated from a large collection of microarray-based expression datasets available in NCBI GEO have been used. Global analysis with anatomical data suggested that 55 kinases are predominantly expressed in the roots, 41 in the leaves/shoots, 58 in the callus/panicles, 36 in anthers/pollen and 71 genes are ubiquitously expressed (Fig. 1; Additional file 1: Table S1). Of these, functions for 16 genes have been elucidated through genetics and molecular studies (Table 1). For example, LOC_Os05g40770 is categorized under root preferred featured anatomical expression group in the current investigation. Previous study revealed that OsRPK1/LOC_Os05g40770 is expressed in the root tips and encodes a Ca2 +-independent leucine-rich-repeat (LRR) receptor-like kinase (RLK). Transgenic rice plants over-expressing OsRPK1 showed undeveloped adventitious and lateral roots (Zou et al. 2014).
Fig. 1

Heatmap analysis of kinase genes showing anatomical tissue-preferred expression pattern. Gene expression pattern reveals five tissue-preferential groups and the total genes in each group is shown in parenthesis. Affymetrix dataset includes the gene expression profiles from both indica and japonica subspecies plant samples. Sample profiling from subspecies are represented using black and grey bars for indica and japonica respectively. Log2-transformed intensity values were taken for generating heatmap and the scale is given above the heatmap. Genes with red arrow pointing the heatmap are the known genes

Heatmap analysis of kinase genes showing anatomical tissue-preferred expression pattern. Gene expression pattern reveals five tissue-preferential groups and the total genes in each group is shown in parenthesis. Affymetrix dataset includes the gene expression profiles from both indica and japonica subspecies plant samples. Sample profiling from subspecies are represented using black and grey bars for indica and japonica respectively. Log2-transformed intensity values were taken for generating heatmap and the scale is given above the heatmap. Genes with red arrow pointing the heatmap are the known genes Biotic stress-related meta-expression data revealed significant upregulation in response to MG (29 kinases), MO (21 kinases), RSV (13 kinases), Xoo (18 kinases), and BPH (49 kinases) (Fig. 2; Additional file 2: Table S2). Of these, functions have been elucidated for eight genes (Table 1). OsACDR1/LOC_Os03g06410, for which present meta-analysis revealed induction under BPH infection, encodes a putative Raf-like mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK) and plays a positive regulatory role against fungal infection by modulating defense related gene expression (Kim et al. 2009).
Fig. 2

Heatmap analysis of expression patterns for kinase genes related to biotic-stress responses. Biotic stress responsive kinase genes heatmap is generated using log2-transformed fold change values under four stress conditions. Number of stress responsive genes in each condition is shown inside parenthesis after the applied biotic stress. Genes with red arrow pointing the heatmap are the known genes

Heatmap analysis of expression patterns for kinase genes related to biotic-stress responses. Biotic stress responsive kinase genes heatmap is generated using log2-transformed fold change values under four stress conditions. Number of stress responsive genes in each condition is shown inside parenthesis after the applied biotic stress. Genes with red arrow pointing the heatmap are the known genes Abiotic stress-related meta-expression data showed that 43 kinases are induced by drought or salt stress, 166 by low temperature, 44 by heat, and 43 by submergence (Fig. 3; Additional file 3: Table S3). Of these, functions of 23 kinase genes have been elucidated (Table 1). They include calcium-dependent protein kinase OsCDPK7/ LOC_Os04g49510 which acts as positive regulator for stress conditions and confers cold, salt and drought resistance on overexpression (Saijo et al. 2000). Interestingly, we also noted the cold depend induction of OsCDPK7 in the abiotic stress dataset based analysis and provides a hint about more potential candidates in the featured groups. Furthermore, the genes that are differentially expressed (log2 fold change >2 and P < 0.05) in root under heavy metal treatment were analyzed to reveal the potential kinase genes involved in soil toxicity. It was revealed that 21 genes were upregulated whereas expressions of 92 genes were declined under arsenic treatment in soil. Similarly, 44 and 79 genes are induced and declined by cadmium treatment, respectively. More numbers of kinase genes were responsive to chromium: expressions of 142 genes are induced; and that of 206 genes were reduced. In case of lead treatment in soil, 36 genes are upregulated and 54 genes are downregulated (Additional file 4: Table S4).
Fig. 3

Heatmap analysis of kinase genes related to abiotic-stress responses. Abiotic stress responsive kinase genes heatmap is generated using log2-transformed fold change values under four stress conditions. Number of stress responsive genes in each condition is shown inside parenthesis after the applied abiotic stress. Genes with red arrow pointing the heatmap are the known genes

Heatmap analysis of kinase genes related to abiotic-stress responses. Abiotic stress responsive kinase genes heatmap is generated using log2-transformed fold change values under four stress conditions. Number of stress responsive genes in each condition is shown inside parenthesis after the applied abiotic stress. Genes with red arrow pointing the heatmap are the known genes The meta-expression data for hormone responses indicated that 67 kinases are up-regulated upon ABA treatment, 27 by IAA, 32 by tZ, and 134 by JA treatment (Fig. 4; Additional file 5: Table S5). Among them, functions of 18 genes have been characterized previously.
Fig. 4

Heatmap analysis of expression patterns for kinase genes in response to hormone treatments. Hormone responsive kinase genes are generated from Agilent log2-transformed fold change hormone dataset, which includes responses from six major hormone treatments at different time intervals in root and shoot. Group of genes induced under specific hormones treatment along with their total number is indicated in parenthesis. Genes with red arrow pointing the heatmap are the known genes

Heatmap analysis of expression patterns for kinase genes in response to hormone treatments. Hormone responsive kinase genes are generated from Agilent log2-transformed fold change hormone dataset, which includes responses from six major hormone treatments at different time intervals in root and shoot. Group of genes induced under specific hormones treatment along with their total number is indicated in parenthesis. Genes with red arrow pointing the heatmap are the known genes Based on the featured expression data, it is evident that these 947 kinases may serve as potential primary targets for further functional studies, with 261 related to anatomy; 130, to biotic stresses; 296, to abiotic stresses; and 260, to hormone responses.

Evaluation of functional redundancy or functional dominance for rice kinases with known functions via PCC analysis

Regarding morphological or physiological traits, the roles played by 26 kinases have been identified through loss-of-function studies. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) can be used to measure the linear dependence between two genes, with a value of ‘1’ representing a perfect, positive correlation. Among paralogous kinase members, PCC values are useful indicators when evaluating functional similarities. PCC values for one to three family members closely linked to each kinase have been generated based on anatomical meta-expression data. These data, summarized in Table 2 and Fig. 5, indicated that 10 kinases exist independently from a clade and another nine have no closely linked members with PCC values >0.5. This explains functional dominancy for the 73 % of kinases with known functions. Therefore, the PCC approach can provide useful estimates of functional redundancy or dominance among family members. In addition, integrating anatomical expression data within the phylogenetics context serves as an effective platform for examining functional dormancy or redundancy within a gene family. Examples of integrated anatomical expression data for subgroups of three kinase families are shown in Fig. 6. Compared with other members, the dominant expression of OsCDPK1 (LOC_Os03g03660) has a PCC value of 0 to 0.5 (Fig. 6a) and predominant expression of OsBAK1 (LOC_Os08g07760) produces a PCC value below zero (Fig. 6B), while OsABC1-2 (LOC_Os02g36570) has redundant expression patterns with PCC values above 0.5 with LCO_Os09g07660 (Fig. 6c). In the case of OsABC1-2, functional studies have used RNAi to repress the expression of OsABC1-2 to overcome the functional redundancy. The observed phenotype might have been caused by suppression of multiple targets closely linked with LOC_Os09g07660 in that tree. Further investigation is needed to clarify this possibility.
Table 2

Rice kinase paralogs with known roles based on loss-of-function studies, and PCC values calculated for paralog pairings

aIndicates the rice kinase genes which have been functionally characterized and identified from OGRO database (http://qtaro.abr.affrc.go.jp/ogro/table)

bIndicates paralogs of rice kinase genes in gene column which are identified from RKD 2.0 databases

cIndicates Pierson correlation coefficient (PCC) value between paralog pairs in gene and paralog columns

dIndicates rice kinase genes (marked with red letters) used in Figure 6. Brown box has 0.5 > PCC value and is estimated to have redundant roles among paralogs; green one with negative PCC value and uncolored area with 0 < PCC value < 0.5 are estimated to have predominant roles among paralogs

Fig. 5

Estimations of functional dominancy for rice kinases, based on meta-expression data. Y-axis, number of kinases with known functions; X-axis, different groups of kinases with known functions, based on range of PCC values or existence of paralogs in subfamilies

Fig. 6

Phylogenomics data for three kinase subfamilies that include members with known functions. Integrating anatomical expression data within context of phylogenic tree suggested functional dominancy of OsCDPK1 (LOC_Os03g03660) with PCC value <0.379 (a), OsBAK1 (LOC_Os08g07760) with PC value of −0.241 (b), and functional redundancy of OsABC1-2 (LOC_Os02g36570) with PCC value of 0.794 = (c). Red boxes indicate pairs of kinases used for PCC analysis, gray color indicates the genes without probes in affymetrix array platform,  and asterisks (*) indicate the selected kinases

Rice kinase paralogs with known roles based on loss-of-function studies, and PCC values calculated for paralog pairings aIndicates the rice kinase genes which have been functionally characterized and identified from OGRO database (http://qtaro.abr.affrc.go.jp/ogro/table) bIndicates paralogs of rice kinase genes in gene column which are identified from RKD 2.0 databases cIndicates Pierson correlation coefficient (PCC) value between paralog pairs in gene and paralog columns dIndicates rice kinase genes (marked with red letters) used in Figure 6. Brown box has 0.5 > PCC value and is estimated to have redundant roles among paralogs; green one with negative PCC value and uncolored area with 0 < PCC value < 0.5 are estimated to have predominant roles among paralogs Estimations of functional dominancy for rice kinases, based on meta-expression data. Y-axis, number of kinases with known functions; X-axis, different groups of kinases with known functions, based on range of PCC values or existence of paralogs in subfamilies Phylogenomics data for three kinase subfamilies that include members with known functions. Integrating anatomical expression data within context of phylogenic tree suggested functional dominancy of OsCDPK1 (LOC_Os03g03660) with PCC value <0.379 (a), OsBAK1 (LOC_Os08g07760) with PC value of −0.241 (b), and functional redundancy of OsABC1-2 (LOC_Os02g36570) with PCC value of 0.794 = (c). Red boxes indicate pairs of kinases used for PCC analysis, gray color indicates the genes without probes in affymetrix array platform,  and asterisks (*) indicate the selected kinases

Conclusions

Of the 1508 kinases featured in RKD 2.0, functions for all except 61 kinases require further examination. This new database will enable researchers to select target kinases more effectively for additional characterization. The predominant expression found among paralogous kinases might be a valuable indicator of functional dominance. Based on loss-of-function analyses and application of PCC values between a kinase and its paralog, we were able to explain the dominancy of 19 kinases with PCC values above 0.5 as well as those that form independent clades in a phylogenetic tree. Primary candidates for loss-of-function studies can be chosen by identifying kinase genes with dominant expression and then comparing them with closely linked family members. These meta-expression data also serve as a source of information about the location and/or conditions that can be applied in subsequent assessments as well as situations in which true functional redundancy may exist. Additional datasets, such as predicted protein–protein interaction networks, further enhance database utility by indicating direct targets regulated by kinases. With the use of gene-indexed mutants that cover at least half of the rice genome, accumulation of diverse omics data will further enhance the functionality of such phylogenomics databases.

Methods

Collection of microarray data

Anatomy: Expression data for the anatomical tissues/organs were retrieved from ROAD (Cao et al. 2012). Abiotic stress: The dataset for abiotic stresses comprised multiple samples from NCBI GEO under the series GSE6901, GSE16108, GSE21651, GSE24048, GSE25176, GSE26280, GSE33204, GSE37940, and GSE38023. Experiment IDs in the Array express dataset (Array Express; https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/. Accessed 2 December 2015) included E-MEXP-2267and E-MEXP-2401. Altogether, 145 individual experiments were parsed for this analysis. Biotic stress: The GEO series for the biotic stress database involved GSE7256, GSE30941, GSE41798, GSE18361, GSE36272, GSE29967, and GSE11025. In all, 103 individual samples were analyzed under these seven series. Hormone response: For analyzing hormone-related meta-expression, we relied upon the Agilent 44 K array data GSE39429, as generated by Sato et al. (2013).

Collection of RNA-Seq data

RNA-Seq anatomical expression dataset consisting of 27 tissues/organs were retrieved from source data developed by Wang et al. (2015). In addition, spatio-temporal transcriptome data of rice root in response to phosphate starvation and recovery were used (Secco et al. 2013).

PCC analysis

An anatomy dataset was used for estimating PCC values among neighboring genes within a subclade. For each gene, the intensity level of the RGAP gene model probes was fetched and formatted in pairs using in-house scripts. For every pair of genes that showed expression across a range of experiments, a PCC value was calculated using the Microsoft Excel function.

Heatmap analysis

To examine the expression patterns of kinase genes in various rice tissues/organs as well as in response to abiotic/biotic stresses or hormone treatments, we used a meta-expression analysis based on 1150 Affymetrix array data plus GEO series GSE39429, which utilized the Agilent 44 K microarray platform (GEO platform GPL6854). We then uploaded the log2 normalized intensity data (tab-delimited text format) into Multi Experiment Viewer (MEV; http://www.tm4.org/, accessed on October 20, 2015) and created the desired heatmaps (Fig. 1; Additional file 1: Table S1). In addition, we developed a meta-expression database for biotic stress responses to MG, MO, RSV, Xoo, and BPH (Fig. 2; Additional file 2: Table S2), a meta-expression database for responses to drought, salt, cold, heat, and submergence (Fig. 3; Additional file 3: Table S3), and a meta-expression database for responses to six hormones (ABA, GA, IAA, BL, JA, and cytokinin/trans-Zeatin) (Fig. 4; Additional file 5: Table S5). Expression data for selected kinases were presented by heatmaps. For other methods used for construction of RKD 2.0, RKD original version retains the details (Dardick et al. 2007).

Abbreviations

NCBI GEO, National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus; non-TE, non-transposable element; PCC, Pearson correlation coefficient; RGAP, rice genome annotation project database; RKD, rice kinase database; ROAD, rice oligonucleotide array database
  21 in total

1.  Genevestigator transcriptome meta-analysis and biomarker search using rice and barley gene expression databases.

Authors:  Philip Zimmermann; Oliver Laule; Josy Schmitz; Tomas Hruz; Stefan Bleuler; Wilhelm Gruissem
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 13.164

2.  CARMO: a comprehensive annotation platform for functional exploration of rice multi-omics data.

Authors:  Jiawei Wang; Meifang Qi; Jian Liu; Yijing Zhang
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of genes expressed ubiquitously in rice.

Authors:  Ki-Hong Jung; Sung-Ruyl Kim; Hoi-Khoanh Giong; Minh Xuan Nguyen; Hyun-Jung Koh; Gynheung An
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 13.164

4.  OsRPK1, a novel leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase, negatively regulates polar auxin transport and root development in rice.

Authors:  Yu Zou; Xiaoyu Liu; Qing Wang; Yu Chen; Cheng Liu; Yang Qiu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-01-08

5.  Curated genome annotation of Oryza sativa ssp. japonica and comparative genome analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Takeshi Itoh; Tsuyoshi Tanaka; Roberto A Barrero; Chisato Yamasaki; Yasuyuki Fujii; Phillip B Hilton; Baltazar A Antonio; Hideo Aono; Rolf Apweiler; Richard Bruskiewich; Thomas Bureau; Frances Burr; Antonio Costa de Oliveira; Galina Fuks; Takuya Habara; Georg Haberer; Bin Han; Erimi Harada; Aiko T Hiraki; Hirohiko Hirochika; Douglas Hoen; Hiroki Hokari; Satomi Hosokawa; Yue-ie Hsing; Hiroshi Ikawa; Kazuho Ikeo; Tadashi Imanishi; Yukiyo Ito; Pankaj Jaiswal; Masako Kanno; Yoshihiro Kawahara; Toshiyuki Kawamura; Hiroaki Kawashima; Jitendra P Khurana; Shoshi Kikuchi; Setsuko Komatsu; Kanako O Koyanagi; Hiromi Kubooka; Damien Lieberherr; Yao-Cheng Lin; David Lonsdale; Takashi Matsumoto; Akihiro Matsuya; W Richard McCombie; Joachim Messing; Akio Miyao; Nicola Mulder; Yoshiaki Nagamura; Jongmin Nam; Nobukazu Namiki; Hisataka Numa; Shin Nurimoto; Claire O'Donovan; Hajime Ohyanagi; Toshihisa Okido; Satoshi Oota; Naoki Osato; Lance E Palmer; Francis Quetier; Saurabh Raghuvanshi; Naomi Saichi; Hiroaki Sakai; Yasumichi Sakai; Katsumi Sakata; Tetsuya Sakurai; Fumihiko Sato; Yoshiharu Sato; Heiko Schoof; Motoaki Seki; Michie Shibata; Yuji Shimizu; Kazuo Shinozaki; Yuji Shinso; Nagendra K Singh; Brian Smith-White; Jun-ichi Takeda; Motohiko Tanino; Tatiana Tatusova; Supat Thongjuea; Fusano Todokoro; Mika Tsugane; Akhilesh K Tyagi; Apichart Vanavichit; Aihui Wang; Rod A Wing; Kaori Yamaguchi; Mayu Yamamoto; Naoyuki Yamamoto; Yeisoo Yu; Hao Zhang; Qiang Zhao; Kenichi Higo; Benjamin Burr; Takashi Gojobori; Takuji Sasaki
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets--10 years on.

Authors:  Tanya Barrett; Dennis B Troup; Stephen E Wilhite; Pierre Ledoux; Carlos Evangelista; Irene F Kim; Maxim Tomashevsky; Kimberly A Marshall; Katherine H Phillippy; Patti M Sherman; Rolf N Muertter; Michelle Holko; Oluwabukunmi Ayanbule; Andrey Yefanov; Alexandra Soboleva
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  SNP-Seek database of SNPs derived from 3000 rice genomes.

Authors:  Nickolai Alexandrov; Shuaishuai Tai; Wensheng Wang; Locedie Mansueto; Kevin Palis; Roven Rommel Fuentes; Victor Jun Ulat; Dmytro Chebotarov; Gengyun Zhang; Zhikang Li; Ramil Mauleon; Ruaraidh Sackville Hamilton; Kenneth L McNally
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Identification and functional analysis of light-responsive unique genes and gene family members in rice.

Authors:  Ki-Hong Jung; Jinwon Lee; Chris Dardick; Young-Su Seo; Peijian Cao; Patrick Canlas; Jirapa Phetsom; Xia Xu; Shu Ouyang; Kyungsook An; Yun-Ja Cho; Geun-Cheol Lee; Yoosook Lee; Gynheung An; Pamela C Ronald
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Characterization of paralogous protein families in rice.

Authors:  Haining Lin; Shu Ouyang; Amy Egan; Kan Nobuta; Brian J Haas; Wei Zhu; Xun Gu; Joana C Silva; Blake C Meyers; C Robin Buell
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  The Rice Oligonucleotide Array Database: an atlas of rice gene expression.

Authors:  Peijian Cao; Ki-Hong Jung; Daeseok Choi; Daehee Hwang; Jun Zhu; Pamela C Ronald
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.783

View more
  9 in total

1.  Bayogenin 3-O-cellobioside confers non-cultivar-specific defence against the rice blast fungus Pyricularia oryzae.

Authors:  Justice Norvienyeku; Lili Lin; Abdul Waheed; Xiaomin Chen; Jiandong Bao; Sami Rukaiya Aliyu; Lianyu Lin; Ammarah Shabbir; Wajjiha Batool; Zhenhui Zhong; Jie Zhou; Guodong Lu; Zonghua Wang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 9.803

2.  OsSIZ2 exerts regulatory influences on the developmental responses and phosphate homeostasis in rice.

Authors:  Wenxia Pei; Ajay Jain; Yafei Sun; Zhantian Zhang; Hao Ai; Xiuli Liu; Huadun Wang; Bing Feng; Rui Sun; Hongmin Zhou; Guohua Xu; Shubin Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Sweet sorghum as biofuel feedstock: recent advances and available resources.

Authors:  Supriya Mathur; A V Umakanth; V A Tonapi; Rita Sharma; Manoj K Sharma
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 4.  Recent advances in the characterization of plant transcriptomes in response to drought, salinity, heat, and cold stress.

Authors:  Khurram Bashir; Akihiro Matsui; Sultana Rasheed; Motoaki Seki
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-05-14

5.  A Systematic View Exploring the Role of Chloroplasts in Plant Abiotic Stress Responses.

Authors:  Yo-Han Yoo; Woo-Jong Hong; Ki-Hong Jung
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The grapevine kinome: annotation, classification and expression patterns in developmental processes and stress responses.

Authors:  Kaikai Zhu; Xiaolong Wang; Jinyi Liu; Jun Tang; Qunkang Cheng; Jin-Gui Chen; Zong-Ming Max Cheng
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.793

7.  The kinome of pineapple: catalog and insights into functions in crassulacean acid metabolism plants.

Authors:  Kaikai Zhu; Hui Liu; Xinlu Chen; Qunkang Cheng; Zong-Ming Max Cheng
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Genome-wide Association Study of a Panel of Vietnamese Rice Landraces Reveals New QTLs for Tolerance to Water Deficit During the Vegetative Phase.

Authors:  Giang Thi Hoang; Lam Van Dinh; Thom Thi Nguyen; Nhung Kim Ta; Floran Gathignol; Chung Duc Mai; Stefan Jouannic; Khanh Dang Tran; Trung Huu Khuat; Vinh Nang Do; Michel Lebrun; Brigitte Courtois; Pascal Gantet
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.783

9.  Fast Track to Discover Novel Promoters in Rice.

Authors:  Yo-Han Yoo; Yu-Jin Kim; Sunok Moon; Yun-Shil Gho; Woo-Jong Hong; Eui-Jung Kim; Xu Jiang; Ki-Hong Jung
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.