Literature DB >> 27538875

The Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics of Carbon and Nitrogen when Maize (Zea mays L.) and Its Neutral Detergent Fibre Were Added to Soil from Zimbabwe with Contrasting Management Practices.

Magali De la Cruz-Barrón1, Alejandra Cruz-Mendoza1, Yendi E Navarro-Noya2, Victor M Ruiz-Valdiviezo3, Daniel Ortíz-Gutiérrez1, Daniel A Ramírez-Villanueva1, Marco Luna-Guido1, Cristian Thierfelder4, Patrick C Wall4, Nele Verhulst4, Bram Govaerts4, Luc Dendooven5.   

Abstract

Water infiltration, soil carbon content, aggregate stability and yields increased in conservation agriculture practices compared to conventionally ploughed control treatments at the Henderson research station near Mazowe (Zimbabwe). How these changes in soil characteristics affect the bacterial community structure and the bacteria involved in the degradation of applied organic material remains unanswered. Soil was sampled from three agricultural systems at Henderson, i.e. (1) conventional mouldboard ploughing with continuous maize (conventional tillage), (2) direct seeding with a Fitarelli jab planter and continuous maize (direct seeding with continuous maize) and (3) direct seeding with a Fitarelli jab planter with rotation of maize sunn hemp (direct seeding with crop rotation). Soil was amended with young maize plants or their neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and incubated aerobically for 56 days, while C and N mineralization and the bacterial community structure were monitored. Bacillus (Bacillales), Micrococcaceae (Actinomycetales) and phylotypes belonging to the Pseudomonadales were first degraders of the applied maize plants. At day 3, Streptomyces (Actinomycetales), Chitinophagaceae ([Saprospirales]) and Dyella (Xanthomonadales) participated in the degradation of the applied maize and at day 7 Oxalobacteraceae (Burkholderiales). Phylotypes belonging to Halomonas (Oceanospirillales) were the first degraders of NDF and were replaced by Phenylobacterium (Caulobacterales) and phylotypes belonging to Pseudomonadales at day 3. Afterwards, similar bacterial groups were favoured by application of NDF as they were by the application of maize plants, but there were also clear differences. Phylotypes belonging to the Micrococcaceae and Bacillus did not participate in the degradation of NDF or its metabolic products, while phylotypes belonging to the Acidobacteriaceae participated in the degradation of NDF but not in that of maize plants. It was found that agricultural practices had a limited effect on the bacterial community structure, but application of organic material altered it substantially.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conventional mouldboard ploughing; Direct seeding; Maize/sunn hemp crop rotation; Soil bacterial community

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27538875     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-016-0807-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  10 in total

1.  Long-Term Harvest Residue Retention Could Decrease Soil Bacterial Diversities Probably Due to Favouring Oligotrophic Lineages.

Authors:  Yaling Zhang; Manyun Zhang; Li Tang; Rongxiao Che; Hong Chen; Tim Blumfield; Sue Boyd; Mone Nouansyvong; Zhihong Xu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Application of young maize plant residues alters the microbiome composition and its functioning in a soil under conservation agriculture: a metagenomics study.

Authors:  Mario Hernández-Guzmán; Valentín Pérez-Hernández; Selene Gómez-Acata; Norma Jiménez-Bueno; Nele Verhulst; Ligia Catalina Muñoz-Arenas; Yendi E Navarro-Noya; Marco L Luna-Guido; Luc Dendooven
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Land-use change alters the bacterial community structure, but not forest management.

Authors:  Viviana Rodríguez Rivera; Yendi E Navarro-Noya; Luc Dendooven; Marco Luna Guido
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Tillage Practices and Residue Management Manipulate Soil Bacterial and Fungal Communities and Networks in Maize Agroecosystems.

Authors:  Yupeng Guan; Bei Xu; Ximei Zhang; Wei Yang
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-20

5.  The Variation in the Rhizosphere Microbiome of Cotton with Soil Type, Genotype and Developmental Stage.

Authors:  Qinghua Qiao; Furong Wang; Jingxia Zhang; Yu Chen; Chuanyun Zhang; Guodong Liu; Hui Zhang; Changle Ma; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Smallholder Farmers' Practices and African Indigenous Vegetables Affect Soil Microbial Biodiversity and Enzyme Activities in Lake Naivasha Basin, Kenya.

Authors:  Eren Taskin; Chiara Misci; Francesca Bandini; Andrea Fiorini; Nic Pacini; Clifford Obiero; Daniel Ndaka Sila; Vincenzo Tabaglio; Edoardo Puglisi
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-11

7.  Responses of CO2 emissions and soil microbial community structures to organic amendment in two contrasting soils in Zambia.

Authors:  Toru Hamamoto; Nhamo Nhamo; David Chikoye; Ikabongo Mukumbuta; Yoshitaka Uchida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  The rhizosphere bacterial community contributes to the nutritional competitive advantage of weedy rice over cultivated rice in paddy soil.

Authors:  Yue Wu; Jian Sun; Pengcheng Yu; Weiliang Zhang; Youze Lin; Dianrong Ma
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.465

9.  Long-term Fertilization Structures Bacterial and Archaeal Communities along Soil Depth Gradient in a Paddy Soil.

Authors:  Yunfu Gu; Yingyan Wang; Sheng'e Lu; Quanju Xiang; Xiumei Yu; Ke Zhao; Likou Zou; Qiang Chen; Shihua Tu; Xiaoping Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  The Rhizosphere Microbiome of Mikania micrantha Provides Insight Into Adaptation and Invasion.

Authors:  Lijuan Yin; Bo Liu; Hengchao Wang; Yan Zhang; Sen Wang; Fan Jiang; Yuwei Ren; Hangwei Liu; Conghui Liu; Fanghao Wan; Haihong Wang; Wanqiang Qian; Wei Fan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.