Literature DB >> 27538795

Long-term Visual Outcomes and Complications of Boston Keratoprosthesis Type II Implantation.

Ramon Lee1, Ziad Khoueir2, Edem Tsikata2, James Chodosh3, Claes H Dohlman3, Teresa C Chen4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the long-term visual outcomes and complications after Boston keratoprosthesis type II implantation in the largest single-center case series with the longest average follow-up.
DESIGN: Retrospective review of consecutive clinical case series. PARTICIPANTS: Between January 1992 and April 2015 at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 48 eyes of 44 patients had keratoprosthesis type II implanted by 2 surgeons (C.H.D. and J.C.).
METHODS: For each eye, data were collected and analyzed on the preoperative characteristics, intraoperative procedures, and postoperative course. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity outcomes, postoperative complications, and device retention.
RESULTS: The most common indications for surgery were Stevens-Johnson syndrome in 41.7% (20 of 48 eyes) and mucous membrane pemphigoid in 41.7% (20 of 48 eyes). Mean follow-up duration was 70.2 months (standard deviation, 61.8 months; median, 52 months; range, 6 months to 19.8 years). Almost all patients (95.8%, 46 of 48 eyes) had a preoperative visual acuity of 20/200 or worse. Postoperative visual acuity improved to 20/200 or better in 37.5% (18 of 48 eyes) and to 20/100 or better in 33.3% (16 of 48 eyes) at the last follow-up visit. The most common postoperative complication was retroprosthetic membrane formation in over half (60.4%, 29 of 48 eyes). The most pressing postoperative complication was glaucoma onset or progression in about a third. Preexisting glaucoma was present in 72.9% (35 of 48 eyes). Glaucoma progressed in 27.1% (13 of 48 eyes) and was newly diagnosed in 8.3% (4 of 48 eyes) after surgery. Other postoperative complications were tarsorrhaphy revision in 52.1% (25 of 48 eyes), retinal detachment in 18.8% (9 of 48 eyes), infectious endophthalmitis in 6.3% (3 of 48 eyes), and choroidal detachment or hemorrhage in 8.3% (4 of 48 eyes). Half of eyes retained their initial keratoprosthesis at the last follow-up (50.0%, 24 of 48 eyes).
CONCLUSIONS: The Boston keratoprosthesis type II is a viable option to salvage vision in patients with poor prognosis for other corneal procedures. Retroprosthetic membranes, keratoprosthesis retention, and glaucoma are major challenges in the postoperative period; however, the keratoprosthesis can still provide improved vision in a select group of patients.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27538795     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  23 in total

1.  'On the capability and nomenclature of the Boston Keratoprosthesis type II'.

Authors:  M Zarei-Ghanavati; A Shalaby Bardan; C Liu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  The role of keratoprostheses.

Authors:  A Shalaby Bardan; N Al Raqqad; M Zarei-Ghanavati; C Liu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Treatment of Oculoplastic and Ocular Surface Disease in Eyes Implanted with a Type I Boston Keratoprosthesis in Southern China: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yuying Zhang; Zhancong Ou; Jin Zhou; Jiajie Zhai; Jianjun Gu; Jiaqi Chen
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  The treatment of end-stage corneal disease: penetrating keratoplasty compared with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Steven Bonneau; C Maya Tong; Yelin Yang; Mona Harissi-Dagher
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation for the Treatment of Glaucoma in Boston Keratoprosthesis Type II Patient.

Authors:  Linda Yi-Chieh Poon; James Chodosh; Demetrios G Vavvas; Claes H Dohlman; Teresa C Chen
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Keratoprosthesis: Current global scenario and a broad Indian perspective.

Authors:  Geetha Iyer; Bhaskar Srinivasan; Shweta Agarwal; Deepti Talele; Ekta Rishi; Pukhraj Rishi; Sripriya Krishnamurthy; Lingam Vijaya; Nirmala Subramanian; Shanmugasundaram Somasundaram
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Collagen-Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose Membranes for Corneal Regeneration.

Authors:  Yuyu Long; Xuan Zhao; Sa Liu; Min Chen; Bingqian Liu; Jian Ge; Yong-Guang Jia; Li Ren
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-01-30

8.  Multifunctional synthetic Bowman's membrane-stromal biomimetic for corneal reconstruction.

Authors:  Xiaokun Wang; Shoumyo Majumdar; Uri Soiberman; Joshua N Webb; Liam Chung; Giuliano Scarcelli; Jennifer H Elisseeff
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 15.304

9.  Effect of Isolation Technique and Location on the Phenotype of Human Corneal Stroma-Derived Cells.

Authors:  Richárd Nagymihály; Zoltán Veréb; Andrea Facskó; Morten C Moe; Goran Petrovski
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 5.443

10.  Rapid and Accurate Pressure Sensing Device for Direct Measurement of Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Tilvawala Gopesh; Andrew Camp; Michael Unanian; James Friend; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.