Literature DB >> 27538358

Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. A propensity score matched analysis.

Gregory Y H Lip1, Allison Keshishian, Shital Kamble, Xianying Pan, Jack Mardekian, Ruslan Horblyuk, Melissa Hamilton.   

Abstract

In addition to warfarin, there are four non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) available for stroke prevention in non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). There are limited data on the comparative risks of major bleeding among newly anticoagulated NVAF patients who initiate warfarin, apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban, when used in 'real world' clinical practice. The study used the Truven MarketScan® Commercial & Medicare supplemental US claims database. NVAF patients aged ≥18 years newly prescribed an oral anticoagulant 01JAN2013-31DEC2014, with a ≥1-year baseline period, were included (study period: 01JAN2012-31DEC2014). Major bleeding was defined as bleeding requiring hospitalisation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance age, sex, region, baseline comorbidities, and comedications. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the PSM hazard ratio (HR) of major bleeding. Among 45,361 newly anticoagulated NVAF patients, 15,461 (34.1 %) initiated warfarin, 7,438 (16.4 %) initiated apixaban, 17,801 (39.2 %) initiated rivaroxaban, and 4,661 (10.3 %) initiated dabigatran. Compared to matched warfarin initiators, apixaban (HR: 0.53; 95 % CI: 0.39-0.71) and dabigatran (HR: 0.69; 95 % CI: 0.50-0.96) initiators had a significantly lower risk of major bleeding. Patients initiating rivaroxaban (HR: 0.98; 95 % CI: 0.83-1.17) had a non-significant difference in major bleeding risk compared to matched warfarin patients. When comparisons were made between NOACs, matched rivaroxaban patients had a significantly higher risk of major bleeding (HR: 1.82; 95 % CI: 1.36-2.43) compared to apixaban patients. The differences for apixaban-dabigatran and dabigatran-rivaroxaban matched cohorts were not statistically significant. Among newly anticoagulated NVAF patients in the real-world setting, apixaban and dabigatran initiation was associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin initiation. When compared to apixaban, rivaroxaban initiation was associated with significantly higher risk of major bleeding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-valvular atrial fibrillation; apixaban; dabigatran; major bleeding; rivaroxaban; warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27538358     DOI: 10.1160/TH16-05-0403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  71 in total

1.  Dabigatran Levels in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: First Post-Marketing Experiences.

Authors:  Tomáš Bolek; Matej Samoš; Ingrid Škorňová; Lucia Stančiaková; Ján Staško; Peter Galajda; Peter Kubisz; Marián Mokáň
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Effectiveness and Safety of Standard-Dose Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With a Single Stroke Risk Factor: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Flemming Skjøth; Peter Brønnum Nielsen; Jette Nordstrøm Kjældgaard; Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  NOAC in "real world" patients with atrial fibrillation in Italy: results from the ISPAF-2 (Indagine Sicoa Paziente Con Fibrillazione Atriale) survey study.

Authors:  Maurizio Volterrani; Ferdinando Iellamo; Cappelletti Alberto; Alcamo Pasquale; Pezzullo Salvatore; Piccinini Massimo; Miano Marco; Urso Lucia; Proto Cesare; Ricciardelli Bruno; Pusineri Enrico
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Antonios Douros; Madeleine Durand; Carla M Doyle; Sarah Yoon; Pauline Reynier; Kristian B Filion
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Real-world efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Francesco Violi; Daniele Pastori
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 6.  Dabigatran Etexilate: A Review in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hannah A Blair; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  The representativeness of direct oral anticoagulant clinical trials to hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Laura Fanning; Jenni Ilomäki; J Simon Bell; Pēteris Dārziņš
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation : Current evidence and guideline recommendations.

Authors:  J W Erath; S H Hohnloser
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 9.  Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct acting oral anticoagulants in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation for stroke prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junguo Zhang; Xiaojie Wang; Xintong Liu; Torben B Larsen; Daniel M Witt; Zebing Ye; Lehana Thabane; Guowei Li; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Anticoagulation in Italian patients with venous thromboembolism and thrombophilic alterations: findings from START2 register study.

Authors:  Maurizio Margaglione; Emilia Antonucci; Giovanna D'Andrea; Ludovica Migliaccio; Walter Ageno; Eugenio Bucherini; Benilde Cosmi; Anna Falanga; Giuliana Martini; Daniela Mastroiacovo; Carmelo Paparo; Daniela Poli; Sophie Testa; Gualtiero Palareti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.