Literature DB >> 27538107

Characterization of a Cryopreserved Split-Thickness Human Skin Allograft-TheraSkin.

Adam Landsman1, Eran Rosines, Amanda Houck, Angela Murchison, Alyce Jones, Xiaofei Qin, Silvia Chen, Arnold R Landsman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of a cryopreserved split-thickness skin allograft produced from donated human skin and compare it with fresh, unprocessed human split-thickness skin.
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous wound healing is a complex and organized process, where the body re-establishes the integrity of the injured tissue. However, chronic wounds, such as diabetic or venous stasis ulcers, are difficult to manage and often require advanced biologics to facilitate healing. An ideal wound care product is able to directly influence wound healing by introducing biocompatible extracellular matrices, growth factors, and viable cells to the wound bed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: TheraSkin (processed by LifeNet Health, Virginia Beach, Virginia, and distributed by Soluble Systems, Newport News, Virginia) is a minimally manipulated, cryopreserved split-thickness human skin allograft, which contains natural extracellular matrices, native growth factors, and viable cells. The authors characterized TheraSkin in terms of the collagen and growth factor composition using ELISA, percentage of apoptotic cells using TUNEL analysis, and cellular viability using alamarBlue assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts), and compared these characteristics with fresh, unprocessed human split-thickness skin.
RESULTS: It was found that the amount of the type I and type III collagen, as well as the ratio of type I to type III collagen in TheraSkin, is equivalent to fresh unprocessed human split-thickness skin. Similar quantities of vascular endothelial growth factor, insulinlike growth factor 1, fibroblast growth factor 2, and transforming growth factor β1 were detected in TheraSkin and fresh human skin. The average percent of apoptotic cells was 34.3% and 3.1% for TheraSkin and fresh skin, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Cellular viability was demonstrated in both TheraSkin and fresh skin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27538107     DOI: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000489991.32684.9e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care        ISSN: 1527-7941            Impact factor:   2.347


  8 in total

1.  Recombinant human ADAMTS13 treatment and anti-NET strategies enhance skin allograft survival in mice.

Authors:  Siu Ling Wong; Jeremy Goverman; Caleb Staudinger; Denisa D Wagner
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 2.  The Use of Biologic Wound Agents in Pediatric Reconstructions.

Authors:  Jessica M May; Monal Depani; Andrew M Ferry; John C Koshy; James F Thornton
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.195

3.  The Health Economic Impact of Living Cell Tissue Products in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds: A Retrospective Analysis of Medicare Claims Data.

Authors:  Adrian Barbul; Helen Gelly; Arti Masturzo
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A retrospective matched-cohort study of 3994 lower extremity wounds of multiple etiologies across 644 institutions comparing a bioactive human skin allograft, TheraSkin, plus standard of care, to standard of care alone.

Authors:  Geoff C Gurtner; Aimee D Garcia; Katie Bakewell; Jason B Alarcon
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Xenogeneic skin transplantation promotes angiogenesis and tissue regeneration through activated Trem2+ macrophages.

Authors:  Dominic Henn; Kellen Chen; Tobias Fehlmann; Artem A Trotsyuk; Dharshan Sivaraj; Zeshaan N Maan; Clark A Bonham; Janos A Barrera; Chyna J Mays; Autumn H Greco; Sylvia E Moortgat Illouz; John Qian Lin; Sydney R Steele; Deshka S Foster; Jagannath Padmanabhan; Arash Momeni; Dung Nguyen; Derrick C Wan; Ulrich Kneser; Michael Januszyk; Andreas Keller; Michael T Longaker; Geoffrey C Gurtner
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  Multi-centre prospective randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate a bioactive split thickness skin allograft vs standard of care in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  David G Armstrong; Robert D Galiano; Dennis P Orgill; Paul M Glat; Marissa J Carter; Lawrence A Di Domenico; Alexander M Reyzelman; Charles M Zelen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.099

7.  Comparative Effectiveness of a Bioengineered Living Cellular Construct and Cryopreserved Cadaveric Skin Allograft for the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers in a Real-World Setting.

Authors:  Terry Treadwell; Michael L Sabolinski; Michelle Skornicki; Nathan B Parsons
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Matched-cohort study comparing bioactive human split-thickness skin allograft plus standard of care to standard of care alone in the treatment of diabetic ulcers: A retrospective analysis across 470 institutions.

Authors:  Adrian Barbul; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Hanna Gordon; Katie Bakewell; Marissa J Carter
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.617

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.