Literature DB >> 27537756

Influence of Mechanical Ventilation on the Incidence of Pneumothorax During Infraclavicular Subclavian Vein Catheterization: A Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Eugene Kim1, Hyun Joo Kim, Deok Man Hong, Hee-Pyoung Park, Jae-Hyon Bahk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether we have to interrupt mechanical ventilation during infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterization. In practice, the clinicians' choice about lung deflation depends on their own discretion. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of mechanical ventilation on the incidence of pneumothorax during infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterization.
METHODS: A total of 332 patients, who needed subclavian venous catheterization, were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 groups: catheterizations were performed with the patients' lungs under mechanical ventilation (ventilation group, n = 165) or without mechanical ventilation (deflation group, n = 167). The incidences of pneumothorax and other complications such as arterial puncture, hemothorax, or catheter misplacements and the success rate of catheterization were compared.
RESULTS: The incidences of pneumothorax were 0% (0/165) in the ventilation group and 0.6% (1/167) in the deflation group. The incidence of pneumothorax in the deflation group was 0.6% higher than that in the ventilation group and the 2-sided 90% confidence interval for the difference was (-1.29% to 3.44%). Because the lower bound for the 2-sided 90% confidence interval, -1.29%, was higher than the predefined noninferiority margin of -3%, the inferiority of the ventilation group over the deflation group was rejected at the .05 level of significance. Other complication rates and success rates of catheterization were comparable between 2 groups. The oxygen saturation dropped below 95% in 9 patients in the deflation group, while none in the ventilation group (P = .007).
CONCLUSIONS: The success and complication rates were similar regardless of mechanical ventilation. During infraclavicular subclavian venous catheterization, interruption of mechanical ventilation does not seem to be necessary for the prevention of pneumothorax.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27537756     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  3 in total

1.  [Catheterization of the subclavian vein and the risk of pneumothorax : Mechanical ventilation increases the risk of pneumothorax during infraclavicular landmark-guided subclavian vein puncture: a prospective randomized study].

Authors:  T Palmaers; P Frank; H Eismann; L Sieg; A Leffler; H Schmitt; A Scholler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  An Uncommon Cause of Contralateral Brachial Plexus Injury Following Jugular Venous Cannulation.

Authors:  Jinguo Wang; Feng Liu; Shunshun Liu; Na Wang
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-13

3.  Quantitative Measurement of Pneumothorax Using Artificial Intelligence Management Model and Clinical Application.

Authors:  Dohun Kim; Jae-Hyeok Lee; Si-Wook Kim; Jong-Myeon Hong; Sung-Jin Kim; Minji Song; Jong-Mun Choi; Sun-Yeop Lee; Hongjun Yoon; Jin-Young Yoo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.