Literature DB >> 27537511

A case for less workup in near hanging.

Madhu Subramanian1, Tjasa Hranjec, Laindy Liu, Erica Imogene Hodgman, Christian Todd Minshall, Joseph P Minei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No guidelines exist for the evaluation of patients after near hanging. Most patients receive a comprehensive workup, regardless of examination. We hypothesize that patients with a normal neurologic examination, without major signs or symptoms suggestive of injury, require no additional workup.
METHODS: We reviewed medical charts of adult trauma patients who presented to a Level I trauma center between 1995 and 2013 after an isolated near-hanging episode. Demographics, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, imaging, and management were collected. Patients were stratified by neurologic examination into normal (GCS score = 15) and abnormal (GCS score <15) groups. Comparison between the groups was completed using univariate analyses.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five patients presented after near hanging: 42 (33.6%) had abnormal GCS score, and 83 (66.4%) were normal. Among the normal patients, seven patients (8.5%) reported cervical spine tenderness; these patients also had abnormal examination findings including dysphagia, dysphonia, stridor, or crepitus. The normal group underwent 133 computed tomography scans and seven magnetic resonance imaging scans, with only two injuries identified: C5 facet fracture and a low-grade vertebral artery dissection. Neither injury required intervention. In patients with normal GCS score, cervical spine tenderness and at least one significant examination finding were 100% sensitive and 79% specific for identifying an underlying injury.
CONCLUSION: Patient with normal GCS score, without signs and symptoms of injury, are unnecessarily receiving extensive diagnostic imaging. Imaging should be reserved for patients with cervical spine tenderness and dysphagia, dysphonia, stridor, and/or crepitus without the fear of incomplete workup. All patients with signs of additional trauma or decreased GCS score should be studied based on preexisting protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27537511     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.313


  4 in total

1.  Do we need neuroimaging in every case of near-hanging?: experience from a level 1 trauma center and analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.

Authors:  Ritu Bordia; Carl Freeman; Henry H Kou; John Culhane
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2021-08-20

2.  Neurological Outcomes Following Suicidal Hanging: A Prospective Study of 101 Patients.

Authors:  Mohammed Turab Jawaid; S Deepak Amalnath; D K S Subrahmanyam
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.383

Review 3.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

4.  Neck-MRI experience for investigation of survived strangulation victims.

Authors:  Christine Bruguier; Pia Genet; Jean-Baptiste Zerlauth; Fabrice Dédouit; Jochen Grimm; Reto Meuli; Tony Fracasso; Silke Grabherr
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2019-05-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.