| Literature DB >> 27537502 |
Eun Young Kim1, Young Saing Kim2, Ja-Young Seo3, Inkeun Park2, Hee Kyung Ahn2, Yu Mi Jeong1, Jeong Ho Kim1, Nambeom Kim4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of sarcopenia, an important component of cancer cachexia, has been demonstrated in oncologic patients. Catabolic drivers have been suggested to be key features of cancer cachexia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27537502 PMCID: PMC4990336 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Single cross-sectional area of skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebrae and the level of C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with small cell lung cancer.
(a) In a 72-year-old male patients, the CT-measured L3 muscle (blue color) index was 43.4 cm2/m2 and the CRP was 11.58 mg/dL at the time of diagnosis. (b) In a 69-year-old male patients, the CT-measured L3 muscle (blue color) index was 75.0 cm2/m2 and the CRP was 0.09 mg/dL at the time of diagnosis.
Characteristics of patients with small cell lung cancer according to the presence of sarcopenia.
| Characteristics | All (n = 186) | Sarcopenia (n = 128) | No sarcopenia (n = 58) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68.8 ± 9.4 | 69.4 ± 9.5 | 67.6 ± 9.0 | 0.237 | |
| | 127 (67.1%) | 89 (69.5%) | 38 (65.5%) | 0.586 |
| 156 (83.9%) | 119 (93.0%) | 37 (63.8%) | < 0.001 | |
| | 166 (89.2%) | 116 (90.6%) | 50 (86.2%) | 0.368 |
| | 20 (10.8%) | 12 (9.4%) | 8 (13.8%) | |
| | 35 (0–171) | 40 (0–171) | 34 (0–120) | 0.309 |
| | 64 (34.4%) | 39 (30.5%) | 25 (43.1%) | 0.093 |
| | 122 (65.6%) | 89 (69.5%) | 33 (56.9%) | |
| | 132 (71.0%) | 87 (68.0%) | 45 (77.6%) | 0.049 |
| | 54 (29.0%) | 41 (32.0%) | 13 (22.4%) | |
| | 59 (31.7%) | 41 (32.0%) | 18 (31.0%) | 0.987 |
| | 101 (54.3%) | 69 (53.9%) | 32 (55.2%) | |
| | 26 (14.0%) | 18 (14.1%) | 8 (13.8%) | |
| 22.3 ± 3.6 | 21.4 ± 3.3 | 24.3. ± 3.5 | < 0.001 | |
| | 28 (15.1%) | 26 (20.3%) | 2 (3.4%) | < 0.001 |
| | 79 (42.5%) | 61 (47.7%) | 18 (31.0%) | |
| | 40 (21.5%) | 22 (17.2%) | 18 (31.0%) | |
| | 39 (21.0%) | 19 (14.8%) | 20 (34.5%) | |
| | 7.90 (3.58–24.11) | 7.77 (3.58–24.11) | 8.07 (3.92–15.02) | 0.473 |
| | 5.00 (1.85–20.08) | 5.04 (1.85–20.08) | 4.92 (2.07–10.81) | 0.646 |
| | 1.74 (0.31–4.41) | 1.69 (0.31–3.85) | 2.04 (0.90–4.41) | 0.002 |
| | 2.7 (0.8–20.6) | 3.07 (1.1–20.6) | 2.50 (0.8–11.5) | 0.011 |
| | 1.68 (0.01–29.03) | 1.98 (0.02–29.02) | 0.86 (0.01–22.85) | 0.026 |
| | 3.95 (2.50–4.90) | 3.90 (2.50–4.90) | 4.10 (3.30–4.70) | 0.041 |
| | ||||
| | 160 (86.0%) | 109 (85.2%) | 51 (87.9%) | 0.875 |
| | 19 (10.2%) | 14 (10.9%) | 5 (8.6%) | |
| | 7 (3.8%) | 5 (3.9%) | 2 (3.4%) | |
| 531 (282–8587) | 544 (282–8587) | 490 (294–2320) | 0.111 | |
| | 105 (56.5%) | 76 (59.4%) | 29 (50.0%) | 0.232 |
Values are means ± standard deviations.
a Student t- test
b Chi-squared test
cMann-Whitney U test
Abbreviations: ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; CRP, C-reactive protein; mGPS, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase
Correlations between L3 muscle index and patient’s characteristics and inflammatory markers.
| Variables | ||
|---|---|---|
| –0.252 | 0.001 | |
| -0.227 | 0.002 | |
| -0.303 | <0.001 | |
| 0.490 | <0.001 | |
| 0.534 | <0.001 | |
| 0.152 | 0.039 | |
| 0.125 | 0.09 | |
| 0.151 | 0.039 | |
| -0.145 | 0.048 | |
| 0.243 | 0.001 | |
| -0.16 | 0.029 | |
| -.0.123 | 0.094 |
Abbreviations: ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; CRP, C-reactive protein; mGPS, modified Glasgow Prognostic Score
Fig 2Correlation graphs between CT-determined L3 muscle index (L3MI) and inflammatory markers.
Multiple regression model to predict L3 muscle index (r = 0.851).
| Variables | ||
|---|---|---|
| -6.853 ± 1.511 | < 0.001 | |
| 1.344 ± 0.161 | < 0.001 | |
| -3.298 ± 1.266 | 0.010 | |
| -0.208 ± 0.105 | 0.048 |
Abbreviations: SE, standard errors; BMI, body mass index; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; CRP, C-reactive protein