| Literature DB >> 27536938 |
Javier R Lama1, Shelly T Karuna2, Shannon P Grant2, Edith M Swann3, Carmela Ganoza1, Patricia Segura1, Silvia M Montano4, Martin Lacherre1, Stephen C De Rosa2,5, Susan Buchbinder6, Jorge Sanchez1,5, M Juliana McElrath2,7,8, Maria P Lemos2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rectal and genital sampling in HIV prevention trials permits assessments at the site of HIV entry. Yet the safety and acceptability of circumcision and sigmoidoscopy (and associated abstinence recommendations) are unknown in uncircumcised men who have sex with men (MSM) at high risk of HIV infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27536938 PMCID: PMC4990246 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Study Conduct.
Flow chart indicates the number and percentage (%) of participants at screening who underwent procedures at each study visit. Also included are those who left the study, and the reasons why. The dashed boxes indicate the visit added after 8 participants had already completed the protocol.
Self-reported Demographic and Sexual Behavior of Study Participants During the Six Months Prior to Screening.*
| Characteristics | N (% of total) | Interquartile Range |
|---|---|---|
| Median age in years | 24 | 24–26 |
| Median Body Mass Index (BMI) | 24 | 23–26 |
| Self-reported sexual identity | ||
| Homosexual | 20 (69.0%) | |
| Bisexual | 9 (31.0%) | |
| Main sexual role | ||
| Exclusively/mostly insertive | 10 (34.4%) | |
| Half insertive, half receptive | 9 (31.0%) | |
| Exclusively/mostly receptive | 10 (34.5%) | |
| 29 (100.0%) | ||
| Median number of sex partners | 8.0 | 3.0–12.0 |
| Insertive oral sex | 24 (82.8%) | |
| Receptive oral sex | 23 (79.3%) | |
| Receptive anal intercourse (RAI) | 22 (75.9%) | |
| RAI always used condoms | 8 (36.4% of all RAI) | |
| Median number RAI partners | 5.0 | 3.0–15.0 |
| Insertive anal intercourse (IAI) | 23 (79.3%) | |
| IAI always used condoms | 12 (52.2% of all IAI) | |
| Median number of IAI partners | 5.0 | 2.0–10.0 |
| 8 (27.6%) | ||
| Median number of female partners | 1.0 | 1.0–2.0 |
| Insertive oral sex | 6 (75.0%) | |
| Insertive anal intercourse (IAI) | 5 (62.5%) | |
| IAI always used condoms | 2 (40% of all IAI) | |
| Median number IAI partners | 1.0 | 1.0–2.0 |
| Vaginal sex | 8 (27.8%) | |
| Vaginal always used condoms | 3 (37.5% of all vaginal) | |
| Median number of vaginal sex partners | 1.5 | 1.0–2.0 |
* Summary enrollment data for 29 study participants
Fig 2Study tolerability, barriers to study participation, and sexual behaviors according to CASI.
A) Opinion of the sigmoidoscopy procedures conducted at weeks 2 and 27. B) Opinion of the circumcision conducted at week 4. C) Perception of loss of work opportunities. D) Perception of reduction of income. E) Receptive anal behaviors (red lines) evaluated abstinence recommendations before and after the sigmoidoscopies at weeks 2 and 27, lasting through weeks 3 and 28 respectively. Receptive oral sex was (black lines) was also monitored but it was not part of abstinence recommendations. F) Insertive penile behaviors evaluated abstinence recommendations after circumcision at week 4, lasting through week 10. In A- F, S marks sigmoidoscopy visit, C indicates the circumcision visit. Confidence intervals were calculated using Wilson scores [48].
MedDRA-coded Procedure Related Events.
*
| Procedure Related Event Associated with | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adverse Drug Reaction | 0 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 1 (4.3%) | 0 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 1 (4.3%) |
| Flatulence | 1 | 1 (4.3%) | 0 | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 1 (4.3%) |
| Bloating | 1 | 1 (4.3%) | 0 | 0 (0%) | 0 | 0 (0%) | 1 | 1 (4.3%) |
| Genital Pain | 9 | 7 (33.3%) | 5 | 5 (23.8%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 14 | 12 (57.1%) |
| Genital Edema | 5 | 5 (23.8) | 1 | 1 (4.8%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 6 | 6 (28.6%) |
| Genital Hematoma/Hemorrhage | 3 | 3 (14.3%) | 2 | 2 (9.5%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 5 | 5 (23.8%) |
| Genital Erythema | 2 | 1 (4.8%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 | 1 (4.8%) |
| Hypertensive crisis | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 | 1 (4.8%) | 1 | 1 (4.8%) |
| Erectile dysfunction | 1 | 1 (4.8%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 | 1 (4.8%) |
| Genital Infection | 1 | 1 (4.8%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 | 1 (4.8%) |
| Serous discharge | 1 | 1 (4.8%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 | 1 (4.8%) |
* Columns show the number of MedDRA-coded events and the number of participants affected, who completed a flexible sigmoidoscopies at least once (n = 23) or were circumcised (n = 21). Some participants experienced multiple symptoms at the same time, especially in the first 9 days post-procedure. In a few cases, pain (n = 2) and erythema (n = 1) resolved, re-appeared three months after circumcision, and resolved again, so they were indicated as separate events.
Fig 3Immune Activation Associated with Interventional Procedures.
A) Representative flow cytometry panels indicating live, CD3+, CD14-, CD4+ cells and the gating scheme for CCR5+, Ki-67+Bcl-2low, α4β7+, CD103+β7+, and CLA+ cells. 3 samples of 168 were excluded due to cell viability less than 70%.B) Percent CCR5+CD4+ T cells in blood over time. C) Percent α4β7+CD4+ T cells in blood over time. D) LBP concentration in serum over time. In panels B-D, dots indicate individual measurements, with box plots summarizing median and IQR; whiskers represent the range. S marks sigmoidoscopy visit, C indicates the circumcision visit. P-values are from Wilcoxon tests used to examine difference between sigmoidoscopy visits (week 2 and 27) and follow-up at weeks 3 and 28, respectively; only significant values are shown. Similar analysis was conducted comparing the circumcision visit (week 4) with the follow-up period including weeks 5 and 10.