Literature DB >> 27536566

The Comparison of Compression Hip Screw and Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of AO Type A2 Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Yee-Suk Kim1, Jae-Seung Hur1, Kyu-Tae Hwang1, Il-Yong Choi1, Young-Ho Kim2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of osteosynthesis using compression hip screw fixation versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in AO type A2 intertrochanteric fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2003 to December 2009, 89 patients were included in this study. They were treated using compression hip screws (43 cases) or bipolar hemiarthroplasty (46 cases). The mean age of patients was 77.7 years (65-94 years) and the mean follow-up period was 5.9 years (1-8.3 years). For comparison of the outcomes in the two groups, statistical analyses were performed with parameters including anesthesia time, operation time, amount of transfusion, hospital stay, general complications, clinical outcome, time of partial weight-bearing using a walker, and radiological failure rate.
RESULTS: Differences in the amount of transfusion, general complications, and clinical outcome (Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score) were not statistically significant between the two groups. The bipolar hemiarthroplasty group showed better results than the compression hip screw group for anesthesia time and the time of partial weight-bearing using a walker. Radiological failures were observed in hips in one case (2.2%) of bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and in four cases (9.3%) of compression hip screw fixation.
CONCLUSION: Among elderly individuals with AO type A2 intertrochanteric fractures, patients treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty were able to perform early ambulation. However, no significant difference in operation time, amount of postoperative transfusion, clinical results, hospital stay, and radiological failure rate was observed between the bipolar hemiarthroplasty and compression hip screw fixation groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipolar hemiarthroplasty; Compression hip screw; Femur; Intertrochanteric fracture

Year:  2014        PMID: 27536566      PMCID: PMC4971123          DOI: 10.5371/hp.2014.26.2.99

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Pelvis        ISSN: 2287-3260


  18 in total

1.  Mechanical failure of Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) fixation in intertrochanteric fracture of the femur.

Authors:  S Nordin; O Zulkifli; W I Faisham
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  2001-12

2.  Cemented hip arthroplasty with a novel cerclage cable technique for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Chris Grimsrud; Raul J Monzon; Jonathan Richman; Michael D Ries
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Cementless calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Shin-Yoon Kim; Yong-Goo Kim; Jun-Kyung Hwang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  [Numerical classification of the function of the hip. 1970].

Authors:  R Merle D'Aubigné
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1990

5.  A reinforced rigid fixation device for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  F Baixauli; V Vicent; E Baixauli; V Serra; E Sánchez-Alepuz; V Gómez; F Martos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Factors affecting sliding of the lag screw in intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  J D Rha; Y H Kim; S I Yoon; T S Park; M H Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Incidence and mortality of hip fracture among the elderly population in South Korea: a population-based study using the national health insurance claims data.

Authors:  Hye-Young Kang; Kyu-hyeon Yang; Yoon Nam Kim; Seong-hwan Moon; Won-Jung Choi; Dae Ryong Kang; Seong Eun Park
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Collapse of intertrochanteric hip fractures fixed with sliding screws.

Authors:  J A Bendo; L S Weiner; E Strauss; E Yang
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1994-08

9.  Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Primary bipolar arthroplasty compared with internal fixation.

Authors:  P Haentjens; P P Casteleyn; H De Boeck; F Handelberg; P Opdecam
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Kevin Kaplan; Ryan Miyamoto; Brett R Levine; Kenneth A Egol; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.020

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Early Rehabilitation in Elderly after Arthroplasty versus Internal Fixation for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jun Il Yoo; Yong Chan Ha; Jae Young Lim; Hyun Kang; Byung Ho Yoon; Hyunho Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Internal Fixation versus Hemiarthroplasty in the Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dong-Peng Tu; Zheng Liu; Yi-Kang Yu; Chao Xu; Xiao-Lin Shi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Outcomes of Combined Neck and Trochanter Fractures of the Femur Treated with Cephallomedullary Nail in Elderly.

Authors:  Hyunseung Yoo; Youngho Cho; Seongmun Hwang
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2019-11-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.