Literature DB >> 27536364

Pharyngeal pH monitoring in gastrectomy patients - what do we really measure?

Dirk Wilhelm1, Alissa Jell1, Hubertus Feussner1, Roland M Schmid2, Monther Bajbouj2, Valentin Becker2.   

Abstract

AIM: Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) has dramatically increased over the last years. For diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux, a newly designed pharyngeal probe (Dx-pH) was recently introduced. It is also recommended to guide therapy decision in antireflux surgery. However, diagnostic results are questionable. Therefore, we establish a reliable reference group with asymptomatic patients after total gastrectomy and, thus, complete extinction of gastric acid production.
METHODS: Pharyngeal pH monitoring was performed in 10 consecutive patients with history of total gastrectomy. All patients were off proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and followed a non-acid diet during the complete measurement period.
RESULTS: All procedures were performed without any complication. Six of the 10 asymptomatic gastrectomy patients (60%) had pathological results derived from the validated reference values (Ryan score) in pharyngeal pH monitoring.
CONCLUSION: Pathological pH values assessed by the Dx-pH device, usually interpreted as pathological aerosolized acidic gastroesophageal and/or laryngopharyngeal reflux, are obviously dissociated from gastric acid production. Further studies are required to determine diagnostic value of the new system. Therefore, the pharyngeal pH monitoring system seems currently not to be useful to guide any diagnostic or therapeutic decisions, in particular if surgical therapy is considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dx-pH; Laryngopharyngeal reflux; gastroesophageal reflux disease; pharyngeal pH monitoring

Year:  2015        PMID: 27536364      PMCID: PMC4971789          DOI: 10.1177/2050640615617637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  18 in total

1.  Proximal esophageal pH monitoring: improved definition of normal values and determination of a composite pH score.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joerg Zehetner; Arzu Oezcelik; Emmanuele Abate; Geoffrey P Kohn; Helen J Sohn; John C Lipham; Steven R Demeester; Tom R Demeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Gastroesophageal reflux evaluation in patients affected by chronic cough: Restech versus multichannel intraluminal impedance/pH metry.

Authors:  Dario Ummarino; Liv Vandermeulen; Bart Roosens; Daniel Urbain; Bruno Hauser; Yvan Vandenplas
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Correlation between oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with suspected GERD-related extra-esophageal symptoms.

Authors:  G Mazzoleni; C Vailati; D G Lisma; P A Testoni; S Passaretti
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Pharyngeal pH alone is not reliable for the detection of pharyngeal reflux events: A study with oesophageal and pharyngeal pH-impedance monitoring.

Authors:  Marie Desjardin; Sabine Roman; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Guillaume Gourcerol; Benoit Coffin; Alain Ropert; François Mion; Frank Zerbib
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  First agreement analysis and day-to-day comparison of pharyngeal pH monitoring with pH/impedance monitoring in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Valentin Becker; Simone Graf; Christoph Schlag; Tibor Schuster; Hubertus Feussner; Roland M Schmid; Monther Bajbouj
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Effectiveness of laparoscopic total and partial fundoplication on extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized study.

Authors:  Oliver O Koch; Stavros A Antoniou; Adolf Kaindlstorfer; Kai U Asche; Frank A Granderath; Rudolph Pointner
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.719

7.  Combined pH-metry/impedance monitoring increases the diagnostic yield in patients with atypical gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Monther Bajbouj; Valentin Becker; Martin Neuber; Roland M Schmid; Alexander Meining
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 8.  Pathophysiology and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  W O A Rohof; D P Hirsch; G E E Boeckxstaens
Journal:  Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol       Date:  2009-09

Review 9.  The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury.

Authors:  J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Oropharyngeal pH monitoring for the detection of liquid and aerosolized supraesophageal gastric reflux.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiener; Ross Tsukashima; Colleen Kelly; Erich Wolf; Molly Schmeltzer; Charles Bankert; Lauren Fisk; Michael Vaezi
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.

Authors:  C Prakash Gyawali; Peter J Kahrilas; Edoardo Savarino; Frank Zerbib; Francois Mion; André J P M Smout; Michael Vaezi; Daniel Sifrim; Mark R Fox; Marcelo F Vela; Radu Tutuian; Jan Tack; Albert J Bredenoord; John Pandolfino; Sabine Roman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 23.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.