Literature DB >> 27536340

Draft genome sequences of three Xanthomonas translucens pathovar reference strains (pv. arrhenatheri, pv. poae and pv. phlei) with different specificities for forage grasses.

Lena Hersemann1, Daniel Wibberg2, Franco Widmer1, Frank-Jörg Vorhölter2, Roland Kölliker1.   

Abstract

As causal agents of bacterial wilt in pastures and meadows, bacteria of the species Xanthomonas translucens are a serious issue in forage grass production. So far, only little is known about host-pathogen interactions at the molecular level and the lack of comprehensive genome data impeded targeted breeding strategies towards resistant forage grass cultivars. Here we announce the draft genome sequences of three grass-pathogenic Xanthomonas translucens pathotype strains, i.e. pv. arrhenatheri LMG 727, pv. poae LMG 728 and pv. phlei LMG 730 isolated from Arrhenatherum elatius (L.) P. Beauv. ex J. Presl & C. Presl (Switzerland), Poa trivialis L. (Switzerland) and Phleum pratense L. (Norway), respectively. The genomes of all three strains revealed a non-canonical type III secretion system and a set of 22 type III effectors as common virulence-related traits. Distinct inter-pathovar differences were observed for the lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis gene cluster and the presence of nonribosomal peptide synthetases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial wilt; Effector genes; LPS gene cluster; NRPS; Plant pathogen; hrp genes

Year:  2016        PMID: 27536340      PMCID: PMC4988018          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-016-0170-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

spp. are known as destructive plant pathogens affecting a variety of important crop plants [1]. In forage grass production, bacterial wilt caused by pathovars of the species is considered to be one of the most important diseases in temperate grassland regions [2]. Characteristic symptoms include withering of leaves and tillers due to pathogen colonization of the vascular system [3, 4]. In addition, chlorotic and later also necrotic lesions can be observed along infected leaves. Affected grass species belong to a variety of different genera including L., L., L., L. and P. Beauv. [2-4]. In the first years after the initial description of bacterial wilt of forage grasses in 1975 in Switzerland [3], pathogens isolated from infected plants were uniformly assigned to pv. graminis [5, 6], later reclassified to pv. graminis [7]. However, comprehensive studies on host range specificities pointed towards a further differentiation into four different pathovars named pv. graminis, pv. arrhenatheri, pv. poae and pv. phlei [4]. While the pathovar graminis is characterized by a broad host range including grass species of different genera, the other three pathovars show distinct host adaptation to the plant species they have been isolated from: A. elatius ( pv. arrhenatheri LMG 727), ( pv. poae LMG 728) and P. pratense ( pv. phlei LMG 730) [4]. The genome data of these host-specialized pathovar reference strains will allow insight into distinct virulence factors involved in host-specific adaption at the molecular level. In combination with the recently sequenced pv. graminis strain Xtg29 [8], these data will valuably complement the genome information on pathovars which are causing bacterial wilt on forage grasses.

Organism information

Classification and features

spp. are Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria, characterized by their typical yellow appearance with varying tones from pale to deep yellow, caused by the pigment xanthomonadin (Fig. 1) [9]. Optimal growth conditions include a temperature of 28 °C and a pH value between 5.5 and 6.5 [10]. For the cultivation of pathovars, isolated from stalks of infected grasses, GYCA medium containing glucose, yeast extract, CaCO3 and agar represents a suitable medium [11, 12]. Further common characteristics of the three pathovar reference strains LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730 are summarized in Table 1.
Fig. 1

X. translucens pv. arrhenatheri LMG 727, X. translucens pv. poae LMG 728 and X. translucens pv. phlei LMG 730 grown on GYCA medium (a) and visualized by light microscopy after over-night cultivation, heat fixation and fuchsine staining (b)

Table 1

Classification and general features of X. translucens pv. arrhenatheri LMG 727, X. translucens pv. poae LMG 728 and X. translucens pv. phlei LMG 730 according to MIGS recommendations [15]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [53]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [54]
Class Gammaproteobacteria TAS [55, 56]
Order Xanthomonadales TAS [56, 57]
Family Xanthomonadaceae TAS [56, 58]
Genus Xanthomonas TAS [59, 60]
Species Xanthomonas translucens TAS [7]
Pathovar arrhenatheri Strain: LMG 727TAS [61]
Pathovar poae Strain: LMG 728TAS [61]
Pathovar phlei Strain: LMG730TAS [61]
Gram stainNegativeTAS [9, 10]
Cell shapeRod-shapedTAS [9]
MotilityMotileIDA
SporulationNon-sporulatingTAS [9]
Temperature range10–35 °CNAS
Optimum temperature28 °CTAS [9]
pH range; Optimum5.5–6.5TAS [9, 10]
Carbon sourceD-glucose, D-mannose, sucrose, trehalose, cellobiose, D-fructoseTAS [10]
MIGS-6HabitatPlant-associatedTAS [4]
MIGS-6.3SalinityTolerance to 1–2 % NaClTAS [10]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementAerobicTAS [9, 10]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipParasiticTAS [4]
MIGS-14PathogenicityPathogenicTAS [4]
MIGS-4Geographic locationLMG 727: SwitzerlandTAS [10]
LMG 728: SwitzerlandTAS [10]
LMG 730: NorwayTAS [10]
MIGS-5Sample collectionLMG 727: 1978TAS [10]
LMG 728: 1978TAS [10]
LMG 730: 1978TAS [10]
MIGS-4.1LatitudeNot reported
MIGS-4.2LongitudeNot reported
MIGS-4.4AltitudeNot reported

a Evidence codes - IDA inferred from direct assay, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [62]

X. translucens pv. arrhenatheri LMG 727, X. translucens pv. poae LMG 728 and X. translucens pv. phlei LMG 730 grown on GYCA medium (a) and visualized by light microscopy after over-night cultivation, heat fixation and fuchsine staining (b) Classification and general features of X. translucens pv. arrhenatheri LMG 727, X. translucens pv. poae LMG 728 and X. translucens pv. phlei LMG 730 according to MIGS recommendations [15] a Evidence codes - IDA inferred from direct assay, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [62] Figure 2 shows the phylogenetic position of the three forage grass affecting pathovar reference strains based on a partial gyrB DNA sequence of 530 bp [13, 14]. For comparison, the type strain NCPPB 3002 of the rice-affecting species was used.
Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree based on partial gyrB sequences using the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap resampling and calculated with MEGA version 6 [63]. The analysis included type strains (T) and pathotype strains (PT) of the genus Xanthomonas listed with their culture collection numbers

Phylogenetic tree based on partial gyrB sequences using the neighbor-joining method with 1,000 bootstrap resampling and calculated with MEGA version 6 [63]. The analysis included type strains (T) and pathotype strains (PT) of the genus Xanthomonas listed with their culture collection numbers

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

The strains LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730 were selected for sequencing based on their distinct differences in host range specificities on forage grasses. The whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers CXOI01000001-CXOI01000089 (LMG 727), CXOK01000001-CXOK01000190 (LMG 728) and CXOJ01000001-CXOJ01000142 (LMG 730). Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 compliance [15].
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyLMG 727LMG 728LMG 730
MIGS 31Finishing qualityHigh quality draftHigh quality draftHigh quality draft
MIGS-28Libraries usedOne Paired-endOne Paired-endOne Paired-end
MIGS 29Sequencing platformsIllumina MiSeqIllumina MiSeqIllumina MiSeq
MIGS 31.2Fold coverage109×249×315×
MIGS 30AssemblersNewbler 2.8Newbler 2.8Newbler 2.8
MIGS 32Gene calling methodProdigalProdigalProdigal
Locus TagXTALMG727XTPLMG728XTPLMG730
Genbank IDCXOI00000000CXOK00000000CXOJ00000000
GenBank Date of Release2015/08/142015/08/142015/08/14
GOLD IDGs0118809Gs0118809Gs0118809
BIOPROJECTPRJEB9902PRJEB9904PRJEB9905
MIGS 13Source Material IdentifierLMG727LMG728LMG730
Project relevanceStudy of grassland pathogens
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

All three strains were obtained from the BCCM/LMG culture collection of the Laboratory of Microbiology, Ghent University in Belgium (accession numbers: LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730). The strains were grown for 15–20 h in CircleGrow® broth (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, USA) at 28 °C and 200 rpm. Genomic DNA was extracted following the protocol for isolation of bacterial genomic DNA using CTAB [16] without the lysozyme application and the subsequent incubation step at 37 °C. The quality of genomic DNA was assessed by gel-electrophoresis and the quantity was estimated by a fluorescence-based method using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) and the Tecan Infinite 200 Microplate Reader (Tecan Deutschland GmbH, Crailsheim, Germany).

Genome sequencing and assembly

A total of 4 μg genomic DNA of each isolate was used to construct a paired-end sequencing library (TruSeq DNA LT Sample Prep Kit, Illumina Inc., San Diego, USA), which was sequenced applying the paired-end protocol on an Illumina MiSeq system. Upon sequencing and processing of the raw data, a de novo assembly was performed using the GS De Novo Assembler software version 2.8. with default settings. The de novo assemblies yielded 58 scaffolds (89 contigs) for LMG 727, 129 scaffolds (190 contigs) for LMG 728 and 84 scaffolds (142 contigs) for LMG 730, respectively.

Genome annotation

Initially, automatic gene prediction and annotation were performed using the genome annotation system GenDB 2.0 [17] and the gene identification strategy Prodigal [18]. Putative rRNA and tRNA genes were identified with RNAmmer [19] and tRNAscan-SE [20]. An automatic annotation was computed based on results of the following different tools: similarity searches were performed against different databases including SWISS-PROT [21], KEGG [22], Pfam [23], TIGRFAM [24] and InterPro [25]. Additionally, SignalP [26] and TMHMM [27] were applied. Finally, the coding sequences were functionally classified by assigning a Cluster of Orthologous Groups number and its corresponding COG category [28] and Gene Ontology numbers [29]. CRISPR repeats were examined using the CRISPR recognition tool [30].

Genome properties

Whole genome sequencing of the strains LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730 resulted in 109, 249 and 315 fold coverage. Annotation of the 4.76, 4.61 and 4.40 Mb genomes featuring a GC content of 68.31 to 68.37 % was performed within the GenDB 2.0 system and resulted in the prediction of 3,878, 3,851 and 3,749 coding sequences, as well as the following numbers of RNA genes: 55 (3 rRNA genes and 52 tRNA genes), 55 (4 rRNA genes and 51 tRNA genes) and 54 (3 rRNA genes and 51 tRNA genes) for the strains LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730. A total of 15 additional genome features were recorded (Table 3) and the distribution of genes into COG functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome statistics

AttributeLMG 727%LMG 728%LMG 730%
Genome size (bp)4,754,971100.004,610,480100.004,399,523100.00
DNA coding (bp)4,132,33886.903,961,22785.913,805,73186.50
DNA G+C (bp)3,250,02268.353,149,41968.313,007,95468.37
DNA scaffolds58100.00129100.0084100.00
Total genes3,933100.003,906100.003,803100.00
Protein coding genes3,87898.63,85198.63,74998.6
RNA genes551.40551.40541.40
Pseudo genes0.000.000.000.000.000.00
Genes in internal clusters97824.8692423.6587623.03
Genes with function prediction2,78170.72,75970.632,69770.91
Genes assigned to COGs2,98775.942,93575.142,92876.99
Genes with Pfam domains3,04577.422,98476.392,96878.04
Genes with signal peptides58514.875861555314.54
Genes with transmembrane helices95424.2593523.9391824.13
CRISPR repeats0.000.000.000.000.000.00
Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

CodeLMG 727%LMG 728%LMG 730%Description
J1734.461734.491714.56Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A20.0020.0030.00RNA processing and modification
K2195.562055.322045.44Transcription
L1363.51363.531353.60Replication, recombination and repair
B10.0010.0010.00Chromatin structure and dynamics
D330.85320.83330.88Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
V711.83621.6701.86Defense mechanisms
T2867.372696.982797.44Signal transduction mechanisms
M2406.182396.22316.16Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N1243.191263.271223.25Cell motility
U1233.171163.011233.28Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O0.000.000.000.000.000.00Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C1955.021955.061915.09Energy production and conversion
G2115.442145.552095.57Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E2486.392446.332496.64Amino acid transport and metabolism
F751.93761.97721.92Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1473.791413.661433.81Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I1413.631343.471353.60Lipid transport and metabolism
P1965.051985.141895.04Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q1473.79761.97752.00Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R3699.513649.453569.49General function prediction only
S3158.123168.23198.50Function unknown
-89122.9791623.7882121.89Not in COGs
Genome statistics Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories

Extended insights

Analysis of the type III effector repertoire

Type III effector proteins (T3Es) represent important virulence factors which facilitate successful host colonization by interfering with plant defense mechanisms [31]. Vice versa, effector proteins are able to trigger defense responses if recognized by corresponding resistance genes within the plant [32]. Thus, effector proteins are considered as important candidate genes, contributing to host range specificity [33]. In order to identify T3Es within the genome data of the three pathotype strains LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730, their corresponding CDS were compared against publicly available effector protein sequences [34]. An e-value of 1E-15 was used as a threshold for identifying putative T3Es. Additionally, the presence of plant-inducible promoter boxes has been identified as described recently [8]. Genes with upstream PIP-boxes were analyzed by applying Blastx against the non-redundant protein sequences (nr) database [35]. Table 5 represents a list of putative type III effector proteins and corresponding effector classes [36] identified for LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730. Listed percentage identities and e-values refer to the lowest values obtained in Blastp analysis within the homologous CDS of the three pathovar reference strains. Analysis of the effector repertoire revealed the presence of 30, 31 and 29 putative T3Es in the genome data of LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730, respectively. Twenty-two putative effector proteins were conserved among all three pathotype strains and 21 of those could clearly be assigned to one of the known effector classes of the genus Xanthomonas. Furthermore, one, three and five homologues of transcription activator like effectors (TALEs) [37] have been identified for LMG 730, LMG 727 and LMG 728, respectively, and may be worth deeper analysis.
Table 5

Homologues of type III effector proteins

Effector classa LMG 727b LMG 728b LMG 730b Identity (%)E-value
AvrBs2XTALMG727_3766XTPLMG728_3304XTPLMG730_338592.040.0
XTALMG727_3767XTPLMG728_3305XTPLMG730_338489.370.0
XopAAXTALMG727_0004*XTPLMG728_1109*XTPLMG730_172979.860.0
NXTPLMG728_0423N
NXTPLMG728_0424N
NXTPLMG728_0425N
NXTPLMG728_0426*N
XopADXTALMG727_0614XTPLMG728_3670XTPLMG730_136891.650.0
XTALMG727_1307NN
XopAHNNXTPLMG730_1645*
XopBXTALMG727_0958*XTPLMG728_0265*XTPLMG730_103783.910.0
NNXTPLMG730_1038*
XopCXTALMG727_2735XTPLMG728_0929XTPLMG730_293093.060.0
XopENNXTPLMG730_2339*
XopFXTALMG727_0160XTPLMG728_3393*XTPLMG730_0026*95.180.0
XTALMG727_0243XTPLMG728_2858*N85.880.0
XTALMG727_0242*NN
XopGXTALMG727_1016XTPLMG728_2920XTPLMG730_266275.583E-111
XopHXTALMG727_1259NN
XopIXTALMG727_3409NXTPLMG730_362689.280.0
XopJXTALMG727_3363NN
XTALMG727_3364*NN
XopKXTALMG727_1234*XTPLMG728_3296*XTPLMG730_2968*95.060.0
XopLXTALMG727_3597*XTPLMG728_2315*XTPLMG730_2526*81.550.0
XTALMG727_3852*XTPLMG728_3529*XTPLMG730_3754*58.941E-176
NNXTPLMG730_3767*
XopNXTALMG727_1719XTPLMG728_0715XTPLMG730_239592.850.0
XopPXTALMG727_0476*XTPLMG728_1678*XTPLMG730_0352*90.970.0
XTALMG727_1884*XTPLMG728_2570*XTPLMG730_3584*86.940.0
NXTPLMG728_3453XTPLMG730_000793.012E-125
NXTPLMG728_3824*N
XopQXTALMG727_3080*XTPLMG728_1854*XTPLMG730_2816*97.690.0
XopRXTALMG727_2355XTPLMG728_1451XTPLMG730_183183.783E-124
XopVXTALMG727_0112*XTPLMG728_3243*XTPLMG730_2612*90.940.0
XopXXTALMG727_1509XTPLMG728_1839XTPLMG730_022585.660.0
XTALMG727_2734XTPLMG728_0930XTPLMG730_292990.320.0
XopZXTALMG727_0656XTPLMG728_3741XTPLMG730_140897.520.0
XopAMXTALMG727_2702*XTPLMG728_2341*XTPLMG730_3036*96.690.0
XopAFNXTPLMG728_1151N
AvrXccANXTPLMG728_0197XTPLMG730_096396.770.0
-XTALMG727_0041*XTPLMG728_0463*XTPLMG730_1692*87.883E-149
-XTALMG727_1653*NN

aAssigned effector classes based on sequence homology to T3Es listed in the publication of White et al. [36] and publically accessible data [34]

bIdentified effector proteins are listed by the corresponding locus tags, while N indicates, that no homologous effector protein could be identified. The presence of PIP-boxes is indicated by asterisks (*)

Homologues of type III effector proteins aAssigned effector classes based on sequence homology to T3Es listed in the publication of White et al. [36] and publically accessible data [34] bIdentified effector proteins are listed by the corresponding locus tags, while N indicates, that no homologous effector protein could be identified. The presence of PIP-boxes is indicated by asterisks (*) The secretion of T3Es is mediated by the type III secretion system [38]. All three sequenced strains (LMG 727, LMG 728, LMG 730) carried a hypersensitivity response and pathogenicity (hrp) gene cluster homologous to the non-canonical type III secretion system recently published as a prevalent finding in the genome of pv. graminis strain Xtg29 [8]. However, in the genome of LMG 728 the neighboring genes hrcC and hrpX were more distantly located to the main part of the hrp gene cluster.

Characterization of further virulence-related traits

In addition to the type III secretion of effector proteins, a wide range of additional mechanisms contribute to bacterial virulence. In the early stages of pathogenesis, flagellar-mediated motility represents a prevalent mechanism for invasion of the host plant [39]. The presence of a flagellar gene cluster [40] was common for LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730 and confirmed by the motility observed for these three strains (data not shown). Successful host colonization is further depending on type I and type II secretion systems which are involved in the translocation of virulence factors (i.e. toxins and degradative enzymes) and thus substantially contribute to bacterial virulence [41]. A T2SS encoding xps gene cluster [42] as well as the corresponding rax genes of the T1SS [43] were identified for the pathovar reference strains LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730. Furthermore, in all three genomes homology to the chromosomal type IV secretion system gene cluster of pv. citri [44] was observed; however, a corresponding virB7 homologue could not be identified in any of the strains. Whereas all of the above mentioned gene clusters were found to be highly conserved among the three pathovar reference strains, we observed a significant difference for the O-antigen encoding part of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) gene cluster [45]. While the flanking genes of this region, i.e. etfA and metC are widely conserved among spp. a highly divergent gene content has been reported for the interjacent region [46, 47]. Comparison of the corresponding region of LMG 727, LMG 728 and LMG 730 revealed 21, 18 and 19 genes, respectively. Among these, 16 to 17 were homologous across all three genomes. Differences in the number of homologous genes were due to nonsense mutations, which caused gene separation in two individual genes for LMG 727 and LMG 728. Another inter-pathovar difference was found for the gum gene cluster, which encodes for xanthan biosynthesis [48]. This extracellular polysaccharide has recently been shown to be involved in biofilm formation and to promote epiphytic growth on host plants [49, 50]. Both, LMG 728 and LMG 730 possessed 11 gum genes as described recently for pv. graminis Xtg29 [8]. Also the LMG 727 genome was found to largely encode the corresponding gene cluster; however, missense mutation of the stop codon in gumK resulted in a gene fusion with the neighboring upstream gene gumL. Analysis of deletion mutants of both genes in pv. oryzae revealed only minor effects on xanthan production and no reduced virulence for the gumL mutant, while the gumK mutant was characterized by both, a reduced xanthan production and impaired virulence on rice leaves [51]. However, considering the mucoid phenotype of LMG 727 (Fig. 1), production of the exopolysaccharide xanthan seemed not impaired by the observed non-stop mutation. Moreover, the rpf gene cluster, involved in the regulation of xanthan production and further virulence-related features [52], was identified in the LMG 728 and LMG 730 genomes as well as for LMG 727. Both, the LPS and xanthan biosynthesis gene clusters, revealed distinct characteristics of the pv. arrhenatheri reference strain. Along with these findings, we identified a nonribosomal peptide synthetase gene cluster consisting of 10 genes to be solely present in the LMG 727 genome.

Conclusions

Aiming to identify virulence factors putatively involved in host range specificity of forage grass pathogens, we sequenced three pathovar reference strains of the species Xanthomonas translucens. In a first step, we analyzed the strain-specific type III effector repertoires, which indicated clear inter-pathovar differences along with a subset of effector proteins highly conserved among all three strains. Accordingly, high conformity in gene content and sequence homology were identified for four secretion systems and the flagellar gene cluster, whereas all three genomes were found to be characterized by a divergent gene cluster of LPS biosynthesis when compared to each other. With regard to the deviating gene content of the gum gene cluster and the identified NRPS genes, the pv. arrhenatheri reference strain LMG 727 revealed further pathovar-specific characteristics. Altogether, these data sets represent a useful basis for the functional analysis of distinct genomic traits involved in host range adaptation of pathovars and a valuable resource for future breeding strategies towards resistant forage grass cultivars.
  42 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Type III secretion machines: bacterial devices for protein delivery into host cells.

Authors:  J E Galán; A Collmer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

Authors:  M A Harris; J Clark; A Ireland; J Lomax; M Ashburner; R Foulger; K Eilbeck; S Lewis; B Marshall; C Mungall; J Richter; G M Rubin; J A Blake; C Bult; M Dolan; H Drabkin; J T Eppig; D P Hill; L Ni; M Ringwald; R Balakrishnan; J M Cherry; K R Christie; M C Costanzo; S S Dwight; S Engel; D G Fisk; J E Hirschman; E L Hong; R S Nash; A Sethuraman; C L Theesfeld; D Botstein; K Dolinski; B Feierbach; T Berardini; S Mundodi; S Y Rhee; R Apweiler; D Barrell; E Camon; E Dimmer; V Lee; R Chisholm; P Gaudet; W Kibbe; R Kishore; E M Schwarz; P Sternberg; M Gwinn; L Hannick; J Wortman; M Berriman; V Wood; N de la Cruz; P Tonellato; P Jaiswal; T Seigfried; R White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Promoter analysis of the Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris gum operon directing biosynthesis of the xanthan polysaccharide.

Authors:  F Katzen; A Becker; A Zorreguieta; A Pühler; L Ielpi
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Functional characterization of the Xcs and Xps type II secretion systems from the plant pathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv vesicatoria.

Authors:  Robert Szczesny; Matthias Jordan; Claudia Schramm; Steve Schulz; Virginie Cogez; Ulla Bonas; Daniela Büttner
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Numerical analysis of 295 phenotypic features of 266 Xanthomonas strains and related strains and an improved taxonomy of the genus.

Authors:  M Van den Mooter; J Swings
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1990-10

7.  Bacterial genes involved in type I secretion and sulfation are required to elicit the rice Xa21-mediated innate immune response.

Authors:  Francisco Goes da Silva; Yuwei Shen; Christopher Dardick; Saul Burdman; Ram C Yadav; Alfredo Lopez de Leon; Pamela C Ronald
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  CRISPR recognition tool (CRT): a tool for automatic detection of clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats.

Authors:  Charles Bland; Teresa L Ramsey; Fareedah Sabree; Micheal Lowe; Kyndall Brown; Nikos C Kyrpides; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Variation suggestive of horizontal gene transfer at a lipopolysaccharide (lps) biosynthetic locus in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, the bacterial leaf blight pathogen of rice.

Authors:  Prabhu B Patil; Ramesh V Sonti
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years.

Authors:  Alex Mitchell; Hsin-Yu Chang; Louise Daugherty; Matthew Fraser; Sarah Hunter; Rodrigo Lopez; Craig McAnulla; Conor McMenamin; Gift Nuka; Sebastien Pesseat; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Maxim Scheremetjew; Claudia Rato; Siew-Yit Yong; Alex Bateman; Marco Punta; Teresa K Attwood; Christian J A Sigrist; Nicole Redaschi; Catherine Rivoire; Ioannis Xenarios; Daniel Kahn; Dominique Guyot; Peer Bork; Ivica Letunic; Julian Gough; Matt Oates; Daniel Haft; Hongzhan Huang; Darren A Natale; Cathy H Wu; Christine Orengo; Ian Sillitoe; Huaiyu Mi; Paul D Thomas; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparative genomics of host adaptive traits in Xanthomonas translucens pv. graminis.

Authors:  Lena Hersemann; Daniel Wibberg; Jochen Blom; Alexander Goesmann; Franco Widmer; Frank-Jörg Vorhölter; Roland Kölliker
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  The genome of the cotton bacterial blight pathogen Xanthomonas citri pv. malvacearum strain MSCT1.

Authors:  Kurt C Showmaker; Mark A Arick; Chuan-Yu Hsu; Brigitte E Martin; Xiaoqiang Wang; Jiayuan Jia; Martin J Wubben; Robert L Nichols; Tom W Allen; Daniel G Peterson; Shi-En Lu
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2017-07-24

3.  Comparative Genomics Identifies a Novel Conserved Protein, HpaT, in Proteobacterial Type III Secretion Systems that Do Not Possess the Putative Translocon Protein HrpF.

Authors:  Céline Pesce; Jonathan M Jacobs; Edwige Berthelot; Marion Perret; Taca Vancheva; Claude Bragard; Ralf Koebnik
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.