Literature DB >> 27536324

Effect of Fixed Orthodontic Treatment on Salivary Flow, pH and Microbial Count.

Sepideh Arab1, Sepideh Nouhzadeh Malekshah2, Ehsan Abouei Mehrizi3, Anita Ebrahimi Khanghah2, Roya Naseh4, Mohammad Moslem Imani5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to evaluate the changes in saliva properties and oral microbial flora in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two important saliva properties namely the salivary flow rate and pH as well as oral microbial flora were assessed in 30 orthodontic patients before starting fixed orthodontic treatment and after six, 12 and 18 weeks of treatment. Selective media, Sabouraud dextrose agar, Mitis salivarius agar and Rogosa agar were used for isolation of Candida albicans, Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using Friedman and Dunn's tests. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: After six, 12 and 18 weeks of commencing fixed orthodontic treatment, the total colony counts of Candida albicans, Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus showed a significant increase. The saliva pH decreased during the orthodontic treatment (P< 0.05) while the salivary flow did not change significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Fixed orthodontic treatment causes major changes in the saliva properties. The changes in oral microflora and saliva properties show the importance of caries preventive measures during orthodontic treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colony Count; Microbial; Orthodontic Appliances; Saliva

Year:  2016        PMID: 27536324      PMCID: PMC4983561     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)        ISSN: 1735-2150


INTRODUCTION

Malocclusion is one of the most common dental disorders and is capable of increasing the risk of periodontal disease and dental caries [1]. Orthodontic treatment of malocclusions can often resolve them, or at least prevent their progression [2]. However, complex design of fixed orthodontic appliances can affect the oral hygiene by influencing several parameters including the saliva properties and microbial count [3]. Changes in the saliva parameters such as decrease in pH, flow rate and buffering capacity of the saliva may contribute to enamel demineralization and increase the susceptibility to dental caries [4]. Among the diverse microflora of the mouth, Streptococcus mutans is the main culprit involved in this process [5-7]. Simultaneous presence of this bacterium with Lactobacillus acidophilus and their synergistic association increase the incidence and severity of dental caries [8,9]. Candida species have also been isolated from dental plaques and caries [10]. Atack et al, [11] were among the first to show the microbiological and periodontal changes that occur during the use of orthodontic appliances. In some other studies, the effects of using these appliances on the oral hygiene were characterized [12,13]. However, some controversial results have been achieved. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the flow rate, pH and microbial count of the saliva after placement of fixed orthodontic appliances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this observational longitudinal study, we selected subjects using non-randomized convenience sampling. Thirty patients (six males and 24 females, aged 12 to 18 years) ready to commence fixed orthodontic treatment were included in this study after signing written informed consent forms. Sample size was determined based on α=0.05 and taking similar published papers in consideration [13-16]. Among the thirty patients participating in this study, 19 patients had class I malocclusion while the remaining 11 patients had class II malocclusion. None of the patients had severe skeletal malocclusion in anteroposterior, vertical or transverse dimensions. All treatment plans were nonsurgical orthodontic treatments including non-extraction, extraction of two upper premolars, and extraction of four premolars. The inclusion criteria were good general health and oral health (absence of oral lesions, dental caries, missing teeth and periodontal disease), and not taking antibiotics. All patients were non-smokers.

Fixed orthodontic treatment

Straight wire 0.022 inch-slot brackets (American orthodontics, Sheboygan, WI, USA) were selected for this study. The same wire sequences were used for all patients and bonding process was performed with the same adhesive for all patients (Transbond XT, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). Treatment was started with NiTi 0.0014-inch wire and continued with NiTi 0.0016-inch, NiTi 0.0018-inch and NiTi 0.0019×0.0025-inch wire after six (T6), 12 (T12) and 18 (T18) weeks, respectively.

Salivary flow rate measurement

Salivary flow rate was assessed at four different time points: Two weeks before the start of orthodontic treatment (T1) and six weeks, 12 weeks and 18 weeks after treatment. Professional oral hygiene instruction was provided for all patients by a well-trained expert oral hygienist before starting the study. Patients were asked to brush their teeth early in the morning of their orthodontic appointment and not to eat, drink or perform any oral hygiene procedure for at least two hours before saliva collection. Therefore, possible changes in the salivary composition were minimized. Saliva was collected between 10 and 12 a.m. The whole saliva was collected by spitting into a sterile test tube for 10 minutes. Thereafter, the volume of the saliva (milliliters per minute) collected during this period was measured and divided by 10 to attain the flow rate in millimeters per minute [14].

Saliva pH measurement

The pH values were measured with portable pH meter strips at the same four time points.

Microbiological procedures

For isolation of Candida species, 0.1 mm of the collected saliva was cultured in a selective medium (Sabouraud dextrose agar + chloramphenicol) for 48 hours at 37°C. The number of colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/ml) was then quantified using the manufacturer’s instructions and the related charts by an expert microbiologist. Mitis salivarius agar medium with bacitracin and sucrose supplement was used for isolation of Streptococcus mutans. Hydrolysis of hippurate and catalase test were also applied for identification of Streptococcus mutans. Isolation of Lactobacillus acidophilus was performed in a Rogosa selective medium. The Rogosa plates were then incubated for 72 hours at 37°C in anaerobic condition (85% nitrogen, 5% carbon dioxide and 10% hydrogen peroxide). Statistical analysis was performed using the Friedman and Dunn’s tests. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 18 Software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Saliva flow rate

A minimal increase in the whole saliva flow rate was observed in the study period, which was not statistically significant (Table 1).
Table 1:

Saliva flow rate in fixed orthodontic treatment at four time points

Time (weeks)Saliva flow rate (mL/min)P-value
01.13±0.42-
61.14±0.25P=0.90
121.20±0.33P=0.47
181.22±0.42P=0.41
Saliva flow rate in fixed orthodontic treatment at four time points

The pH value measurement

As shown in Table 2, pH value decreased from 7.18±0.35 in T1 to 6.81±0.31 in T18. This decrease in pH value was statistically significant (P<0.001).
Table 2:

The pH values of whole saliva after six, 12 and 18 weeks of treatment

Time (weeks)pHP-value
07.18±0.35-
66.78±0.23P<0.001
126.76±0.28P<0.001
186.81±0.31P<0.001
The pH values of whole saliva after six, 12 and 18 weeks of treatment

Microbial count

The results of Friedman test revealed statistically significant differences between the four time points (P<0.001). Therefore, the Dunn’s test was used for pairwise comparisons and showed statistically significant differences in all comparisons (P<0.001). Total Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus counts showed a similar increase at six weeks after the beginning of orthodontic treatment and continued up to 12 weeks. The colony count of the mentioned bacteria decreased from this point on; however, the changes were not statistically significant (Tables 3 and 4). As indicated in Table 5, the number of Candida albicans colonies also increased during the study period (P<0.001).
Table 3:

The effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on salivary mutans streptococci count after six, 12 and 18 weeks

Time (weeks)Total Streptococcus mutans count CFU/mLMean rankP-value

0 (undetectable)1 (<105)2(>105)
012541.93-
6017132.60P<0.001
12014162.80P<0.001
18016142.67P<0.001
Table 4:

The effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on Lactobacillus acidophilus count after six, 12 and 18 weeks

Time (weeks)Total Lactobacillus acidophilus count CFU/mLMeanP-value

0 (undetectable)1 (<105)2(>105)
072301.72-
602282.72P<0.001
12020102.85P<0.001
1802282.72P<0.001
Table 5:

The effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on Candida albicans count after six, 12 and 18 weeks

Time (weeks)Total Candida albicans count CFU/mLP-value
029.78±20.34-
655.19±21.27P<0.001
1258.41±18.31P<0.001
1861.14±21.17P<0.001
The effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on salivary mutans streptococci count after six, 12 and 18 weeks The effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on Lactobacillus acidophilus count after six, 12 and 18 weeks The effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on Candida albicans count after six, 12 and 18 weeks

DISCUSSION

Placement of fixed orthodontic appliances compromises the patients’ oral hygiene not only by impeding oral hygiene procedures, but also by changing the saliva properties and microbial count. Therefore, in the present study, total microbial count and salivary flow and pH were analyzed at different time points before and during fixed orthodontic treatment. In the current study, the increase in the saliva flow rate was not statistically significant (Table 1). This observation was almost comparable to those reported by some other authors [14,15]. However, Peros et al, [16] found that salivary flow rate increased significantly after 12 and 18 weeks of fixed orthodontic treatment. But it should be mentioned that stimulated saliva was evaluated in their study. Similar results were reported by Forsberg et al, [17]. They showed that salivary flow rate significantly increased during orthodontic therapy. Their findings were not in accordance with the result of our study, which may be due to their smaller sample size. The salivary flow rate as an important saliva property plays a critical role in oral health. An increase in flow rate promotes the physical cleansing action of the saliva, increases its antimicrobial activities, and accelerates clearance of substrates. On the other hand, low saliva secretion rate adversely affects oral health [18]. The change in salivary flow rate as mentioned above can be considered as a physiological response to presence of fixed orthodontic appliances. The introduction of these appliances into the oral environment appears to alter the oral homeostasis. Evaluation of pH, another important saliva parameter showed a significant decrease after the beginning of orthodontic therapy (Table 2). This result was also consistent with that of previous studies, which indicated a decrease in pH following the placement of fixed appliances [14]. Another notable finding in our study was the increase in number of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus during the study period (Tables 3 and 4). The presence of fixed orthodontic appliances on teeth might be the likely reason for this observation. Based on the study performed by Kanaya et al, [19], the main bacterial isolates identified during orthodontic therapy were mutans Streptococci. In another study, it was indicated that Streptococcus mutans was strongly implicated in the initiation and progression of dental caries, and its presence was significantly associated with dental plaque [18]. Recently, it was also shown that during orthodontic procedures, Mutans streptococci are among the most important causes of bacterial endocarditis [20]. Although we assessed the bacterial count of the saliva for up to 12 weeks after commencing orthodontic treatment, the microbial changes might show different trends over longer treatment periods, especially based on the type of orthodontic appliances. Therefore, using in-office bacterial tests for microbial monitoring during orthodontic treatment has been suggested by Mummolo et al, [21]. It also seems logical to conduct studies to assess the saliva properties during the entire course of orthodontic treatment. In the present study, there was also a significant change in the total count of Candida species. Our results showed that among the isolated Candida species, Candida albicans was the most predominant type. As described by previous studies, this change may be due to the foreign objects like appliances, which could alter the oral microbial populations [10].

CONCLUSION

The results of this study confirmed the fact that treatment of patients with fixed orthodontic appliances may change the oral microbial flora and the saliva properties as the total colony counts of Candida albicans, Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus increased and the saliva pH decreased during the course of treatment. Due to these changes, it is recommended to provide patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment with more precise oral hygiene instructions.
  20 in total

1.  The effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on saliva flow rate and saliva electrolyte concentrations.

Authors:  Y Li; B Hu; Y Liu; G Ding; C Zhang; S Wang
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 2.  Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review.

Authors:  N E Atack; J R Sandy; M Addy
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Effect of chlorhexidine varnish on bacterial levels in plaque and saliva during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  M Madléna; G Vitalyos; S Márton; G Nagy
Journal:  J Clin Dent       Date:  2000

4.  The effect of oral health education on dental plaque development and the level of caries-related Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp.

Authors:  Grazyna Smiech-Slomkowska; Joanna Jablonska-Zrobek
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Quantitative determination of adhesion patterns of cariogenic streptococci to various orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Sug-Joon Ahn; Shin-Jae Lee; Bum-Soon Lim; Dong-Seok Nahm
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Mutans streptococci, lactobacilli and caries prevalence in 11- and 12-year-old Icelandic children.

Authors:  B Köhler; S Bjarnason
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.383

7.  Salivary microbial and nonmicrobial parameters in children with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Kristina Peros; Senka Mestrovic; Sandra Anic-Milosevic; Mladen Slaj
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  In-office bacteria test for a microbial monitoring during the conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Stefano Mummolo; Enrico Marchetti; Maria Rita Giuca; Gianni Gallusi; Simona Tecco; Roberto Gatto; Giuseppe Marzo
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.151

9.  Ecology of lactobacilli in the oral cavity: a review of literature.

Authors:  C Badet; N B Thebaud
Journal:  Open Microbiol J       Date:  2008-04-29

10.  Effect of fixed orthodontic appliances on salivary properties.

Authors:  Giulio Alessandri Bonetti; Serena Incerti Parenti; Giulia Garulli; Maria Rosaria Gatto; Luigi Checchi
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.750

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of toxicity and response to oxidative stress generated by orthodontic bands in human gingival fibroblasts.

Authors:  Alexandre Marcos Bandeira; Elizabeth Ferreira Martinez; Ana Paula Dias Demasi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Oral colonization by Candida species in orthodontic patients before, during and after treatment with fixed appliances: A prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  Icíar Sanz-Orrio-Soler; Santiago Arias de Luxán; Chirag C Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-11-01

Review 3.  Changes in oral microbiota due to orthodontic appliances: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alessandra Lucchese; Lars Bondemark; Marta Marcolina; Maurizio Manuelli
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.474

4.  Clinical and Salivary Findings in Patients with Metal and Crystalline Conventional and Self-Ligating Orthodontic Brackets.

Authors:  Antonija Jurela; Karlo Sudarević; Ana Budimir; Vlaho Brailo; Božana Lončar Brzak; Bernard Janković
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2019-09

5.  Linking Sfl1 Regulation of Hyphal Development to Stress Response Kinases in Candida albicans.

Authors:  Ohimai Unoje; Mengli Yang; Yang Lu; Chang Su; Haoping Liu
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 4.389

6.  Prioritization of predisposing factors of gingival hyperplasia during orthodontic treatment: the role of amount of biofilm.

Authors:  Séverine Vincent-Bugnas; Leslie Borsa; Apolline Gruss; Laurence Lupi
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Physiological and Immunological Changes Associated with Oral Microbiota When Using a Thermoplastic Retainer.

Authors:  Wurood Kh Al-Lehaibi; Khulood A Al-Makhzomi; Hani Sh Mohammed; Hamid Hammad Enezei; Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.