| Literature DB >> 27536259 |
Chien-Heng Chu1, Kao-Teng Yang1, Tai-Fen Song1, Jen-Hao Liu1, Tsung-Min Hung2, Yu-Kai Chang1.
Abstract
The present study sought to determine whether cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with cognitive function in late-middle-aged adults from event-related desynchronization (ERD) and event-related synchronization (ERS) perspectives. Late-middle-aged adults were categorized into either the high-fitness group or the low-fitness group based on their estimated cardiorespiratory fitness values. The participants completed the Stroop Test, which is comprised of incongruent and neutral conditions, while the brain activities were recoded. The alpha ERD and ERS values based on the equation proposed by Pfurtscheller (1977) were further calculated. The results revealed that the adults with higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness demonstrated superior Stroop performance, regardless of Stroop congruency. While these high-fitness adults had less positive upper alpha ERD values in the later epoch window compared to their lower-fitness counterparts, they had greater lower alpha ERD values in the early epoch window. Additionally, in the late epoch window, the high-fitness adults showed less positive lower alpha ERD values on neutral, but not incongruent condition, relative to their low-fitness counterparts. These findings suggest that cardiorespiratory fitness of the late-middle-aged adults is positively associated with cognitive functioning, especially the cognitive processes related to the inhibition of task-irrelevant information and those processes required the devotion of greater amounts of attentional resources to a given task.Entities:
Keywords: ERD; ERS; Stroop Test; executive control; fitness
Year: 2016 PMID: 27536259 PMCID: PMC4971443 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01135
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Demographic and cardiorespiratory fitness characteristics of the high-fitness and low-fitness groups (means ± SD).
| Age (years) | 60.20 ± 4.07 | 58.70 ± 3.53 |
| Height (cm) | 159.32 ± 0.12 | 161.12 ± 0.10 |
| Weight | 60.43 ± 5.58 | 65.33 ± 6.45 |
| BMI | 23.74 ± 1.65 | 25.24 ± 3.12 |
| Digit Span test | ||
| Forward | 11.50 ± 1.79 | 10.60 ± 2.11 |
| Backward | 5.60 ± 1.60 | 5.50 ± 0.95 |
| VO2max (ml/kg/min) | 49.50 ± 10.66 | 27.36 ± 4.50 |
| IPAQ (MET/week) | 3640.00 ± 2021.59 | 1638.00 ± 2504.32 |
BMI, body mass index; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; VO2max, EstimatedVO2max; IPAQ, International Physical Activity Questionnaire (MET).
significant differences between groups, p < 0.05.
Figure 1Differences in the performances of the high-fitness (High-fit) and low-fitness (Low-fit) groups for the incongruent and neutral conditions of the Stroop Test. *represents the significant difference between Stroop congruency (p < 0.05). #represents the significant difference between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Differences in the upper alpha frequency band (ER%) values for the T3 epoch window between the high-fitness (High-fit) and low-fitness (Low-fit) groups for the incongruent and neutral conditions of the Stroop Test. *represents the significant difference between Stroop congruency (p < 0.05). #represents the significant difference between groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Differences in the lower alpha frequency band (ER%) values for the (A) T1 epoch window and (B) T3 epoch window between the high-fitness (High-fit) and low-fitness (Low-fit) groups for the incongruent and neutral conditions of the Stroop Test. *represents the significant difference between Stroop congruency (p < 0.05). #represents the significant difference between groups (p < 0.05).