D J Kagedan1, F Frankul2, A El-Sedfy3, C McGregor4, M Elmi1, B Zagorski5, M E Dixon6, A L Mahar7, J Vasilevska-Ristovska2, L Helyer8, C Rowsell9, C J Swallow10, C H Law1, N G Coburn1. 1. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Department of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 2. Department of General Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON. 3. Department of Surgery, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, U.S.A. 4. Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON. 5. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON. 6. Department of Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, U.S.A. 7. Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON. 8. Division of General Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS. 9. Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON. 10. Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Before undergoing curative-intent resection of gastric adenocarcinoma (ga), most patients undergo abdominal computed tomography (ct) imaging to determine contraindications to resection (local invasion, distant metastases). However, the ability to detect contraindications is variable, and the literature is limited to single-institution studies. We sought to assess, on a population level, the clinical relevance of preoperative ct in evaluating the resectability of ga tumours in patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: In a provincial cancer registry, 2414 patients with ga diagnosed during 2005-2008 at 116 institutions were identified, and a primary chart review of radiology, operative, and pathology reports was performed for all patients. Preoperative abdominal ct reports were compared with intraoperative findings and final pathology reports (reference standard) to determine the negative predictive value (npv) of ct in assessing local invasion, nodal involvement, and intra-abdominal metastases. RESULTS: Among patients undergoing gastrectomy, the npv of ct imaging in detecting local invasion was 86.9% (n = 536). For nodal metastasis, the npv of ct was 43.3% (n = 450). Among patients undergoing surgical exploration, the npv of ct for intra-abdominal metastases was 52.3% (n = 407). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative abdominal ct imaging reported as negative is most accurate in determining local invasion and least accurate in nodal assessment. The poor npv of ct should be taken into account when selecting patients for staging laparoscopy.
BACKGROUND: Before undergoing curative-intent resection of gastric adenocarcinoma (ga), most patients undergo abdominal computed tomography (ct) imaging to determine contraindications to resection (local invasion, distant metastases). However, the ability to detect contraindications is variable, and the literature is limited to single-institution studies. We sought to assess, on a population level, the clinical relevance of preoperative ct in evaluating the resectability of ga tumours in patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: In a provincial cancer registry, 2414 patients with ga diagnosed during 2005-2008 at 116 institutions were identified, and a primary chart review of radiology, operative, and pathology reports was performed for all patients. Preoperative abdominal ct reports were compared with intraoperative findings and final pathology reports (reference standard) to determine the negative predictive value (npv) of ct in assessing local invasion, nodal involvement, and intra-abdominal metastases. RESULTS: Among patients undergoing gastrectomy, the npv of ct imaging in detecting local invasion was 86.9% (n = 536). For nodal metastasis, the npv of ct was 43.3% (n = 450). Among patients undergoing surgical exploration, the npv of ct for intra-abdominal metastases was 52.3% (n = 407). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative abdominal ct imaging reported as negative is most accurate in determining local invasion and least accurate in nodal assessment. The poor npv of ct should be taken into account when selecting patients for staging laparoscopy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Gastric cancer; cancer staging; computed tomography imaging; diagnostic imaging; population; stomach cancer
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Jeroen G Lijmer Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Malcolm A Moore; Sultan Eser; Nurbek Igisinov; Saginbek Igisinov; Mohammad Ali Mohagheghi; Alireza Mousavi-Jarrahi; Gülsün Ozentürk; Mashhura Soipova; Murat Tuncer; Tomotaka Sobue Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Date: 2010
Authors: Jaffer A Ajani; David J Bentrem; Stephen Besh; Thomas A D'Amico; Prajnan Das; Crystal Denlinger; Marwan G Fakih; Charles S Fuchs; Hans Gerdes; Robert E Glasgow; James A Hayman; Wayne L Hofstetter; David H Ilson; Rajesh N Keswani; Lawrence R Kleinberg; W Michael Korn; A Craig Lockhart; Kenneth Meredith; Mary F Mulcahy; Mark B Orringer; James A Posey; Aaron R Sasson; Walter J Scott; Vivian E Strong; Thomas K Varghese; Graham Warren; Mary Kay Washington; Christopher Willett; Cameron D Wright; Nicole R McMillian; Hema Sundar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 11.908