Literature DB >> 27536083

Upregulated epidermal growth factor receptor expression following near-infrared irradiation simulating solar radiation in a three-dimensional reconstructed human corneal epithelial tissue culture model.

Yohei Tanaka1, Jun Nakayama2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Humans are increasingly exposed to near-infrared (NIR) radiation from both natural (eg, solar) and artificial (eg, electrical appliances) sources. Although the biological effects of sun and ultraviolet (UV) exposure have been extensively investigated, the biological effect of NIR radiation is still unclear. We previously reported that NIR as well as UV induces photoaging and standard UV-blocking materials, such as sunglasses, do not sufficiently block NIR. The objective of this study was to investigate changes in gene expression in three-dimensional reconstructed corneal epithelial tissue culture exposed to broad-spectrum NIR irradiation to simulate solar NIR radiation that reaches human tissues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA microarray and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis were used to assess gene expression levels in a three-dimensional reconstructed corneal epithelial model composed of normal human corneal epithelial cells exposed to water-filtered broad-spectrum NIR irradiation with a contact cooling (20°C). The water-filter allowed 1,000-1,800 nm wavelengths and excluded 1,400-1,500 nm wavelengths.
RESULTS: A DNA microarray with >62,000 different probes showed 25 and 150 genes that were up- or downregulated by at least fourfold and twofold, respectively, after NIR irradiation. In particular, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was upregulated by 19.4-fold relative to control cells. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that two variants of EGFR in human corneal epithelial tissue were also significantly upregulated after five rounds of 10 J/cm(2) irradiation (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: We found that NIR irradiation induced the upregulated expression of EGFR in human corneal cells. Since over half of the solar energy reaching the Earth is in the NIR region, which cannot be adequately blocked by eyewear and thus can induce eye damage with intensive or long-term exposure, protection from both UV and NIR radiation may prevent changes in gene expression and in turn eye damage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA microarray; eye damage; gene expression; quantitative real-time PCR analysis; solar near-infrared

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27536083      PMCID: PMC4975136          DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S111530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Interv Aging        ISSN: 1176-9092            Impact factor:   4.458


Introduction

Near-infrared (NIR) radiation can penetrate the skin and the sclera of the eye. The high permeability of NIR radiation also allows it to affect tissues deeper within the eye, such as muscles, the lens, and retina. NIR radiation can induce various biological effects,1–9 and intensive or long-term exposure to NIR radiation is a factor in premature aging. Despite the wide prevalence of a variety of ultraviolet (UV) blocking materials, such as sunblock, sunglasses, glasses, films, and umbrellas, that are useful in protecting our tissue against UV exposure, NIR cannot be blocked sufficiently.8 Consequently, in the absence of suitable protection, NIR radiation can induce various kinds of tissue damage and diseases, such as cataracts and photoaging.7,8 The human cornea plays a critical role in refracting light onto the retina and also protects the eye against external agents. Since the epithelial layer of the cornea provides the first line of defense against environmental insults, the structural integrity of this layer is a key component of corneal function.10 Although UV-induced corneal damage has been described in many previous studies,11–15 the effects induced by NIR radiation on the cornea have not been thoroughly investigated. We hypothesized that NIR irradiation simulating solar NIR radiation that reaches human tissues can induce changes in gene expression. To test this hypothesis, a three-dimensional reconstructed human corneal epithelial model with multilayered, corneal epithelium-like structure was used to simulate the human eye, and we evaluated DNA microarray and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis results from normal human corneal epithelial cells exposed to water-filtered broad-spectrum NIR irradiation to simulate solar NIR radiation that reaches the eye.

Materials and methods

NIR irradiation

NIR irradiation was performed with a broadband NIR source (Titan; Cutera, Brisbane, CA, USA). The NIR device emits an NIR spectrum between 1,100 nm and 1,800 nm, with water filtering to remove wavelengths between 1,400 nm and 1,500 nm, and simulates solar NIR radiation that reaches the skin of humans on the Earth’s surface. To avoid thermal effects, the sapphire contact cooling tip was set to a fixed temperature of 20°C. In our previous in vitro study, ten rounds at 10 J/cm2 using continuous energy single irradiation pulses of 4.3 seconds achieved drastic reduction in cell count. Therefore, we performed five rounds of NIR irradiation at 10 J/cm2.

Corneal epithelial model

The three-dimensional reconstructed human corneal epithelial model (LabCyte CORNEA-MODEL) prepared from enzymatically digested normal human corneal epithelial tissues was purchased from Japan Tissue Engineering Corporation, Aichi, Japan as an in vitro model of corneal tissue.16 Cells were cultured in media (Assay Medium; Japan Tissue Engineering Corporation), which was changed every 2 days until the cultures reached subconfluence.16 The subconfluent corneal cells were then subcultured with trypsin and seeded on a cell culture insert containing a microporous membrane with a 0.4 μm pore size. Corneal cells were cultivated between the air and liquid interface to form a multilayered, corneal epithelium-like structure. All cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.

RNA extraction

Total RNA from the corneal epithelial cells was extracted in QIAzol reagent (Qiagen NV, Venlo, the Netherlands) and spin-column purified using a RNeasy mini spin column (Qiagen NV). The RNA was extracted from control and irradiated groups, which consisted of six whole individual three-dimensional reconstructed human corneal epithelial models. The quantity and quality of the RNA samples were then measured using UV absorbance (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA), and the quality was also assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer Series II (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

cRNA synthesis, labeling, and purification

Cy3-labeled cRNA samples were synthesized using the Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each time point, 50 ng of total RNA was used to generate first-strand cDNA. After the denaturation (10 minutes at 65°C) and cRNA synthesis (2 hours at 40°C) steps, the reactions were incubated at 70°C for 15 minutes to inactivate the Affinity-Script enzyme (Agilent Technologies). For labeling reactions, cRNA samples were each mixed with 6 μL of transcription master mix cocktail containing Cy3-CTP and incubated at 40°C for 2 hours. Purification was performed using the RNeasy mini spin columns. Labeled cRNA was quantified on a Nanodrop ND-1000 (NanoDrop Technologies), and quality was also checked by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer Series II.

Microarray analysis

cRNA fragmentation mixtures were first created using 600 ng of experimental sample. These mixtures were incubated at 60°C for 30 minutes. Hybridization mixtures were prepared by adding 2× hybridization buffer and mixing by pipetting. Hybridization was carried out at 65°C for 17 hours. Washing was performed using Agilent’s Stabilization and Drying Solution. Slides were scanned using the microarray scanner (Agilent Technologies), and images were processed by the Feature Extraction software (Agilent Technologies) with background correction. Data were imported into GeneSpring, and normalization was performed with a 75 percentile shift. After normalization and filtering of the raw data output files, log-fold changes in gene expression in the NIR-irradiated group compared with the control group were analyzed using the GeneSpring GX 11.0 software (Agilent Technologies) to determine the upregulated and downregulated genes, using a twofold change as the cutoff. Upregulated and downregulated genes were further clustered into functional gene groups using the ontology analysis function with the GeneSpring GX 11.0 software. Microarray data were deposited into the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME)-compliant Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (accession number: GSE76500, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE76500).

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was achieved using the DNA Engine Opticon 2 System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). All six whole individual three-dimensional reconstructed human corneal epithelial tissue culture models were used for quantitative real-time PCR analysis. The primer sequences of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family member 5 (TTLL5), and PQ loop repeat containing 2 (PQLC2) are given in Table 1. Since PQLC was ubiqitously and highly expressed in all samples, PQLC2 was used for normalization. The variant-specific primer sequences for the four EGFR variants are given in Table 2. cDNA templates were prepared for each RNA sample by reverse transcription reaction using SuperScript III (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Each quantitative PCR (25 μL) contained 1 μL of cDNA template, 1.5 μL of forward and reverse primer (10 μM each), 7.5 μL of 2× master mix, and 3.5 μL of nuclease-free water. The thermal cycling conditions included one cycle at 95°C for 5 minutes and 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 68°C for 30 seconds.
Table 1

EGFR, TTLL5, and PQLC2 primers used for quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Probe nameGene nameSystematic nameForward primerReverse primer
A_33_P3351955EGFRNM_201282CCGACAGCTATGAGATGGAGATTCCGTTACACACTTTGCG
A_24_P321752TTLL5NM_015072GGGTCCTACCTCGAGCATAAGCAGTCATTCTGTCCTGGAA
A_33_P3388491PQLC2NM_001040125TACCTGCTGCACCACCTGTGGATGGAGATGATGGTGTC

Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PQLC2, PQ loop repeat containing 2; TTLL5, tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family member 5.

Table 2

Primers used for quantitative real-time PCR analysis to analyze EGFR variants

Probe nameGene nameSystematic nameForward primerReverse primer
A_33_P3351955EGFR variant 1NM_005228.3GGAAGAAGCTTGCTGGTAGCTCTGGAAGACTTGTGGCTTG
EGFR variant 2NM_201282.1TTCACTGTCTGACTTTAGTCTCCGTGTCAGGACTTTATTTGAAGC
EGFR variant 3NM_201283.1TTGAGCTGAATTATCACATGAAGAACAGGAAATATGTCGAAAAG
EGFR variant 4NM_201284.1CAGGAGTCATGGGAGAAAACGAATAACATGGCTTTGAGAC

Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Statistical analysis

Significance was evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U-test. All statistical data are presented as the mean ± SEM, and a P-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

To elucidate changes in genetic expression induced by exposure to NIR irradiation that simulates solar NIR radiation that reaches human eye tissues, DNA microarray analysis was carried out using RNA isolated from control and NIR-irradiated corneal epithelial cells. Using ~6.3×104 probes, we identified 52 upregulated genes and 98 downregulated genes in the NIR-irradiated group compared with the control group. Gene ontology analysis of these 150 genes identified 41 upregulated genes that encode proteins with receptor-binding properties (Table 3). Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was then performed for the two genes showing the highest degree of upregulation in the DNA microarray analysis: EGFR and TTLL5. EGFR showed a high degree of upregulation (19.4-fold) relative to control cells, although statistically significant upregulation of EGFR and TTLL5 was not observed (P=0.5127 and P=0.8273, respectively) (Figure 1) using the primer sequences listed in Table 1. Meanwhile, when the expression of EGFR variants was assessed in a DNA microarray analysis, expression increased by 1.0-fold and 1.3-fold for EGFR variants 1 and 3, respectively. Upon inclusion of variant-specific primer sequences for EGFR (Table 2), quantitative real-time PCR analysis revealed that statistically significant upregulation of variants 1 and 3 was observed (P<0.05), whereas there was no statistically significant upregulation of variants 2 and 4 (P=0.1266 and P=0.5127, respectively) (Figure 2).
Table 3

Upregulated genes in the NIR-irradiated group as compared with the control group

Probe nameFold change (NIR irradiated group/control)Gene name
A_33_P335195519.384924Epidermal growth factor receptor
A_24_P3217529.591753Tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family, member 5
A_21_P00146467.402783ARAP1 antisense RNA 2
A_32_P2138317.007086Striatin interacting protein 2
A_33_P32547086.3440003Rho GTPase activating protein 40
A_33_P34244675.524943Consortin, connexin sorting protein
A_33_P32140525.515191STXBP5 antisense RNA 1
A_32_P4470015.1329985Chromosome 15 open reading frame 65
A_23_P962853.8647346Receptor accessory protein 1
A_23_P1116573.838098Sonic hedgehog
A_23_P484143.4167788Cyclin A1
A_23_P1524203.3141088Gse1 coiled-coil protein
A_33_P32807793.268676Transmembrane protein 254
A_23_P2122583.1161842Kininogen 1
A_33_P32500553.0366344Mitogen-activated protein kinase 12
A_33_P36284093.0126626DKFZp434H1419
A_24_P940543.012153Serine/threonine kinase 4
A_23_P3737993.0048454CWC22 spliceosome-associated protein homolog (S. cerevisiae)
A_33_P32390842.9155593Family with sequence similarity 86, member A
A_33_P32855652.882729Claudin 3
A_33_P34141222.8212333Zinc finger protein 260
A_33_P33344482.5918674Small nucleolar RNA, H/ACA box 62
A_33_P32899962.5722313Ubiquitin specific peptidase 45
A_23_P784582.4986203Zinc finger protein 350
A_23_P2094262.4799447Trafficking protein, kinesin binding 2
A_23_P202252.4031472Ribonucleotide reductase M2 B (TP53 inducible)
A_23_P3170562.3642921NADH dehydrogenase, subunit 6 (complex I)
A_33_P32576782.3144212Histone cluster 2, H3a
A_23_P2500022.2984264HECT domain and ankyrin repeat containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1
A_23_P3475412.2951477Glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl-d-aspartate 3A
A_33_P32614082.2560165Transmembrane inner ear
A_33_P32672302.217625TBC1 domain family, member 3G
A_23_P359952.197076CXADR-like membrane protein
A_23_P1495452.1729438Histone cluster 2, H2be
A_19_P003207192.1425538Mdm4 p53 binding protein homolog (mouse)
A_33_P33680492.1341257Chromosome 1 open reading frame 233
A_23_P4063852.123014F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 16
A_23_P1437132.0802233Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3G
A_33_P33121942.0800095Tubulin folding cofactor B
A_24_P1121602.0614858Uroplakin 3B
A_23_P1608282.0397763Chromosome 1 open reading frame 159

Abbreviation: NIR, near-infrared.

Figure 1

Quantitative real-time PCR validation of EGFR and TTLL5.

Notes: Fold-change in expression was calculated by setting the median value of expression seen in the control to 1.0. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n=3).

Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NIR, near-infrared; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SEM, standard error of the mean; TTLL5, tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family member 5.

Figure 2

Quantitative real-time PCR validation of four EGFR variants.

Notes: Fold-change in expression was calculated by setting the median value of expression seen in the control to 1.0. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM (n=3). *P<0.05.

Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; NIR, near-infrared; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SEM, standard error of the mean.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examines changes in genetic expression in three-dimensional reconstructed corneal epithelial tissue after NIR irradiation to simulate solar NIR radiation that reaches human eye tissues. The biological effects of sun and UV exposure have been extensively investigated. However, over half of the solar energy is in the NIR range, and most of the UV-blocking materials cannot block NIR radiation. Moreover, humans are continuously exposed to artificial NIR radiation from sources, such as electrical appliances.17,18 Despite the prevalence of NIR radiation, the need for protective measures against this type of radiation has received less attention than that of UV. Because solar NIR radiation is filtered by atmospheric water,19,20 water-filtering in experimental settings is indispensable to provide an accurate simulation of solar NIR radiation that reaches human tissues.5 Cooling is also recommended when investigating the effects of NIR radiation, as NIR radiation can increase surface temperatures and induce thermal effects.5 Indeed, without water filter or contact cooling, NIR irradiation immediately increases the temperature of the superficial layer of culture fluid in a laboratory dish or on skin, as NIR radiation is predominantly absorbed by hydrogen bond-containing molecules, such as water and hemoglobin. Meanwhile, as the NIR radiation penetrates deeper into the target, its energy can dissipate to the point where insufficient amounts of energy reach target cells in the base of culture dishes or deeper tissues in skin samples. Thus, to accurately investigate the biological effects of solar NIR radiation that reaches human tissues, a water-filter that excludes wavelengths between 1,400 nm and 1,500 nm and a cooling system were used in this study.5 A three-dimensional reconstructed human corneal epithelial model was used as an in vitro model of corneal tissue. The corneal epithelial model was proven to have a fully differentiated corneal epidermal tissue including all major corneal epithelial cell layers, such as the basal cell layer, the wing layer, and the superficial cell layer. Cytokeratin-3 is a specific marker of corneal epithelium, and it was expressed in all layers of the corneal epithelial model.16 MUC-1 and MUC-16, which compose the transmembrane glycoproteins in the surface of the corneal epithelium, were well expressed in the superficial layer of the corneal epithelial model.16 Cells in the corneal epithelium are connected by desmosomes, tight junctions, and adherence junctions.16 Claudin-1, which is a marker of a tight junction, desmograin-3, which is a marker of desmosome, and E-cadherin, which is a marker of an adherence junction, are localized in the interface between cells at all cell layers, including the superficial layers.16 Lamin is an important constituent in the basement membrane at the basal corneal epithelium junction, which is expressed continuously in basal cells of the corneal epithelial model basal layer.16 The basement membrane was smooth like that of the human eye.16 Therefore, the corneal epithelial model reproduced many of the characteristics of the native human corneal tissue, and it provides a morphologically relevant means to assess NIR effects as an alternative to animal testing. The corneal epithelium, like other epithelial barriers in the human body, is continuously subjected to physical, chemical, and biological insults, which can produce a wound and/or loss of barrier functions. Proper healing of corneal wounds is vital for maintaining a clear, healthy cornea and preserving vision. Corneal epithelium responds rapidly to injury, wherein wound healing occurs by cells migrating as a sheet to cover the defect and reestablish barrier functions.21 In wounded cornea, the epithelium plays a central role, not only as a key cell type in corneal repair, but also as a growth factor source.22 As in other tissues, several growth factors are suggested to play a role in regulating corneal epithelial function and wound healing.21,23 Following NIR irradiation that simulates solar radiation, microarray analysis of corneal epithelial cell DNA in this study showed that EGFR was highly expressed, and statistically significant upregulation of EGFR variants 1 and 3 was observed (P<0.05) by quantitative real-time PCR. EGFR is a prototypic tyrosine kinase receptor that is part of a larger family of ErbB receptors. ErbB2, ErbB3, and ErbB4 share with EGFR characteristics that include extracellular ligand-binding sites, intracellular kinase domains, and tyrosine-rich regions. EGFR activated in response to injury serves as a powerful mediator of corneal epithelial wound healing10 by coordinating multiple extracellular signals generated in response to cell injury.24–27 In turn, the levels of EGFR and tyrosine kinase activity are major determinant factors for epithelial cell function in tissues and organs.22 Echoing this concept is the finding that in some cancer patients, treatment with EGFR-specific monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and gefitinib (an EGFR kinase inhibitor) resulted in ocular abnormalities, including diffuse punctate keratitis and corneal erosion.28–30 Thus, maintaining a proper level of EGFR signaling is critical for corneal homeostasis.22 TTLL5 gene has 32 exons with high expression in heart and skeletal muscle and lower expression in many other tissues, including the eye and brain.31,32 It encodes a 1,281-amino acid protein that is localized to the cytoplasm and nucleus.31 TTLL5 is thought to be a key initiator of polyglutamylation in α-tubulin33 and has been previously reported to be essential for the correct function of sperm flagella.34 TTLL5 plays a role in polyglutamylation of primary cilia in vitro.35 Notably, genes involved in the polyglutamylation and deglutamylation of α-tubulin have been associated with photoreceptor degeneration in mice.35 In this study, TTLL5 showed the high degree of upregulation in the DNA microarray analysis, whereas statistically significant upregulation of TTLL5 was not observed in quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Further studies are needed to determine if a higher power output or increased treatment frequency may promote significant upregulation of TTLL5. The findings here that EGFR expression is significantly upregulated following exposure of corneal epithelial cells to NIR irradiation support that solar NIR radiation that reaches human tissues can induce corneal cell injury. Although significant EGFR expression upregulation occurred after just one treatment at the tested power output, further studies are needed to determine if a higher power output or increased treatment frequency may promote even larger changes in expression. Furthermore, this was a preliminary study based on a fairly small number of samples, so a large-scale study will be needed.

Conclusion

NIR irradiation simulating solar NIR radiation that reaches human tissues induced upregulated expression of EGFR in human corneal cells. NIR radiation represents more than half of solar energy and cannot be sufficiently blocked by eyewear. Moreover, intensive or long-term NIR radiation exposure can induce photoaging. Thus, the results of this study indicate that enhanced protection from and avoidance of both UV and NIR radiation should be considered to prevent eye damage.
  31 in total

Review 1.  The biological effects of UV-B on the eye.

Authors:  H R Taylor
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Establishment of a new in vitro test method for evaluation of eye irritancy using a reconstructed human corneal epithelial model, LabCyte CORNEA-MODEL.

Authors:  Masakazu Katoh; Fumiyasu Hamajima; Takahiro Ogasawara; Ken-ichiro Hata
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  STAMP, a novel predicted factor assisting TIF2 actions in glucocorticoid receptor-mediated induction and repression.

Authors:  Yuanzheng He; S Stoney Simons
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Non-thermal cytocidal effect of infrared irradiation on cultured cancer cells using specialized device.

Authors:  Yohei Tanaka; Kiyoshi Matsuo; Shunsuke Yuzuriha; Huimin Yan; Jun Nakayama
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 6.716

5.  Biallelic variants in TTLL5, encoding a tubulin glutamylase, cause retinal dystrophy.

Authors:  Panagiotis I Sergouniotis; Christina Chakarova; Cian Murphy; Mirjana Becker; Eva Lenassi; Gavin Arno; Monkol Lek; Daniel G MacArthur; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Anthony T Moore; Graham E Holder; Anthony G Robson; Uwe Wolfrum; Andrew R Webster; Vincent Plagnol
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Practical management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib.

Authors:  Neelam T Shah; Mark G Kris; William Pao; Leslie B Tyson; Barbara M Pizzo; Murk-Hein Heinemann; Leah Ben-Porat; Dana L Sachs; Robert T Heelan; Vincent A Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Correlation of proliferative and anti-apoptotic effects of HGF, insulin, IGF-1, IGF-2, and EGF in SV40-transformed human corneal epithelial cells.

Authors:  Ryoji Yanai; Naoyuki Yamada; Makoto Inui; Teruo Nishida
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Injury and nucleotides induce phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor: MMP and HB-EGF dependent pathway.

Authors:  Ilene Boucher; LingLing Yang; Courtney Mayo; Veronica Klepeis; Vickery Trinkaus-Randall
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Wounding sheets of epithelial cells activates the epidermal growth factor receptor through distinct short- and long-range mechanisms.

Authors:  Ethan R Block; Jes K Klarlund
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Wound-induced HB-EGF ectodomain shedding and EGFR activation in corneal epithelial cells.

Authors:  Ke-Ping Xu; Yu Ding; Jianhua Ling; Zheng Dong; Fu-Shin X Yu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  2 in total

1.  Long-term objective assessments of skin rejuvenation using solar protection and solar repair shown through digital facial surface analysis and three-dimensional volumetric assessment.

Authors:  Yohei Tanaka
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2019-08-02

2.  Corneal UV Protective Effects of a Topical Antioxidant Formulation: A Pilot Study on In Vivo Rabbits.

Authors:  Marisa Palazzo; Francesco Vizzarri; Lubomir Ondruška; Michele Rinaldi; Luigi Pacente; Germano Guerra; Francesco Merolla; Ciro Caruso; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.