Dear Editor,I have read with interest a recent report by Kumar et al. [1] on the putative role of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in ischemic stroke. In their report, the authors refute an association of 2 promoter variants on the phenotype under study based on earlier case-control investigations. Data from this article, however, warrant a reappraisal of existing findings.On one hand, numerous investigations were not retrieved. A quick search using the same databases as employed by the authors unveiled additional studies both for −572G/C [2,3] and for −174G/C [4,5,6] and around 10,000 additional genotypes that had been available at the time of the August 30, 2014, data freeze. I am not even counting the genome-wide association studies that were published from 2007 onward [7]. On the other hand, the results cited in the article appear to have been muddled. Thus, a study by Flex et al. [8] refers to an entirely different phenotype of peripheral artery occlusive disease (only 22 patients actually also had a history of stroke). Assuming that the authors had intended to refer to another study by the same author [9], we face the obvious overlap of cases and controls with a further investigation [10]. Similarly, overlap of cases and controls was ignored for the studies by Revilla et al. [11] and Chamorro et al. [12]. The number of cases and controls pooled is thus inflated. Another issue that has been overlooked is the sharp discrepancy in −174C allele frequencies in the studies by Yamada et al. [13] and Tong et al. [14]. No alleles have so far been identified with frequencies ranging from 0.22 to 0.76 in non-isolated Asian (or Caucasian) populations. The only reasonable explanation for this discordant observation is a muddling of major and minor alleles at some point, and therefore, the outlier study should have been dropped from the meta-analysis. On the whole, the present quantitative review is best reconducted to eliminate the above sources of bias and to provide an accurate estimate of IL-6 impact on the susceptibilty to ischemic stroke.
Authors: Xingyu Wang; Suzanne Cheng; Victoria H Brophy; Henry A Erlich; Christine Mannhalter; Klaus Berger; Wolfgang Lalouschek; Warren S Browner; Yu Shi; E Bernd Ringelstein; Christof Kessler; Jan Luedemann; Klaus Lindpaintner; Lisheng Liu; Paul M Ridker; Robert Y L Zee; Nancy R Cook Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-01-08 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Andrea Flex; Eleonora Gaetani; Pierangelo Papaleo; Giuseppe Straface; Anna S Proia; Giovanni Pecorini; Paolo Tondi; Paolo Pola; Roberto Pola Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-08-12 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: A Flex; E Gaetani; R Pola; A Santoliquido; F Aloi; P Papaleo; A Dal Lago; E Pola; M Serricchio; P Tondi; P Pola Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Mar Matarín; W Mark Brown; Sonja Scholz; Javier Simón-Sánchez; Hon-Chung Fung; Dena Hernandez; J Raphael Gibbs; Fabienne Wavrant De Vrieze; Cynthia Crews; Angela Britton; Carl D Langefeld; Thomas G Brott; Robert D Brown; Bradford B Worrall; Michael Frankel; Scott Silliman; L Douglas Case; Andrew Singleton; John A Hardy; Stephen S Rich; James F Meschia Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 44.182