Jiawei Wang1,2, Francisco J Valiente-Soriano3, Francisco M Nadal-Nicolás3, Giuseppe Rovere3, Shida Chen1, Wenbin Huang1, Marta Agudo-Barriuso3, Jost B Jonas4, Manuel Vidal-Sanz3, Xiulan Zhang1. 1. Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Eye Center of Shandong University, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Murcia and Murcian Institute of Biosanitary Research-Hospital Arrixaca (IMIB-Arrixaca), Murcia, Spain. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyse miRNA regulation in a rat model of acute ocular hypertension (AOH). METHODS: Acute ocular hypertension (AOH) was induced in the left eye of adult albino rats by inserting a cannula connected with a saline container into the anterior chamber. The contralateral eye served as a control. Seven days later, animals were killed. Retinas were used either for quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and microglial cells or for miRNA array hybridization, qRT-PCR and Western blotting. RESULTS: Anatomically, AOH caused axonal degeneration, a significant loss of RGCs and a significant increase in microglial cells in the ganglion cell layer. The miRNAs microarray analysis revealed 31 differentially expressed miRNAs in the AOH versus control group, and the regulation of 12 selected microRNAs was further confirmed by qRT-PCR. Bioinformatic analysis indicates that several signalling pathways are putatively regulated by the validated miRNAs. Of particular interest was the inflammatory pathway signalled by mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). In agreement with the in silico analysis, p38 MAP kinase, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and iNOS proteins were significantly upregulated in the AOH retinas. CONCLUSIONS: Acute IOP elevation led to changes in the expression of miRNAs, whose target genes were associated with the regulation of microglia-mediated neuroinflammation or neural apoptosis. Addressing miRNAs in the process of retinal ischaemia and optic nerve damage in association with high IOP elevation may open new avenues in preventing retinal ganglion cell apoptosis and may serve as target for future therapeutic regimen in acute ocular hypertension and retinal ischaemic conditions.
PURPOSE: To analyse miRNA regulation in a rat model of acute ocular hypertension (AOH). METHODS:Acute ocular hypertension (AOH) was induced in the left eye of adult albino rats by inserting a cannula connected with a saline container into the anterior chamber. The contralateral eye served as a control. Seven days later, animals were killed. Retinas were used either for quantitative analysis of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and microglial cells or for miRNA array hybridization, qRT-PCR and Western blotting. RESULTS: Anatomically, AOH caused axonal degeneration, a significant loss of RGCs and a significant increase in microglial cells in the ganglion cell layer. The miRNAs microarray analysis revealed 31 differentially expressed miRNAs in the AOH versus control group, and the regulation of 12 selected microRNAs was further confirmed by qRT-PCR. Bioinformatic analysis indicates that several signalling pathways are putatively regulated by the validated miRNAs. Of particular interest was the inflammatory pathway signalled by mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). In agreement with the in silico analysis, p38 MAP kinase, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and iNOS proteins were significantly upregulated in the AOH retinas. CONCLUSIONS: Acute IOP elevation led to changes in the expression of miRNAs, whose target genes were associated with the regulation of microglia-mediated neuroinflammation or neural apoptosis. Addressing miRNAs in the process of retinal ischaemia and optic nerve damage in association with high IOP elevation may open new avenues in preventing retinal ganglion cell apoptosis and may serve as target for future therapeutic regimen in acute ocular hypertension and retinal ischaemic conditions.
Acute angle‐closure glaucoma results in an increase in the intra‐ocular pressure (IOP) which may temporarily exceed the retinal perfusion pressure, and this may result in retinal ischaemia, optic nerve damage and retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death (Selles‐Navarro et al. 1996; Lafuente et al. 2002). Although a number of mechanisms and molecules have been found to be potentially associated with the aetiology of retinal/optic nerve damage in acute angle‐closure glaucoma, the main causes are, so far, elusive (Almasieh et al. 2012). In particular, the role that microRNAs (miRNA) may play in the development of retinal damage is yet unclear (Genini et al. 2014). miRNAs are an evolutionarily conserved class of non‐coding small RNAs that have a length of approximately 19 ~23 nucleotides and play a crucial part in the post‐transcriptional regulation of gene expression (Bartel 2004, 2009; Bentwich et al. 2005; Lewis et al. 2005). miRNAs derive from long endogenous transcripts and undergo several processing steps to yield mature miRNAs. The mature miRNAs regulate the gene expression through binding the 3′‐untranslated region (3′‐UTR) of its target gene, resulting in either reduced protein translation or degradation of the mRNA (Bartel 2004, 2009; Bentwich et al. 2005; Lewis et al. 2005). Considerable abundance of miRNAs has been found in the retina. Previous studies have indicated the essential roles of miRNAs in the development, survival and normal function of the retina (Almasieh et al. 2012; Maiorano & Hindges 2012). miRNAs also play a key role in the regulation of polarization of microglial cells and have thus an effect on the progress of retinal disorders (Andreeva & Cooper 2014).An abnormal expression or activity of miRNAs in the retina has been described in a variety of ophthalmic diseases in humanpatients and in animal models. These disorders include primary vitreo‐retinal lymphoma, uveitis, ocular adnexal lymphoma or diabetic retinopathy among other conditions (Kovacs et al. 2011; Dunmire et al. 2013; Funari et al. 2013; Hother et al. 2013; Kutty et al. 2013; Tanaka et al. 2014; Tuo et al. 2014). Recently, it has been described the implication of miRNAs in the maintenance of the trabecular meshwork, an organ of high relevance in high‐tension glaucoma (Saccà et al. 2016). Since an association between miRNA regulation and acute ocular hypertension (AOH) has not yet been examined, we purposed here to analyse whether retinal miRNAs were regulated in a rat model of acute increase in IOP (AOH; acute ocular hypertension) and if so, to study which signalling pathways and biological process may be affected using in silico prediction tools.
Materials and Methods
Animal handling
The study was approved by the Committees of Animal Care of the Sun Yat‐Sen University (Guangzhou, China) and the University of Murcia (Murcia, Spain), and all experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the European Union Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments and the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) statement for the use of animals in ophthalmologic research. All experiments were performed in adult female Sprague Dawley rats (200–250 g body weight). Animals had free access to food and water and were kept in an environmentally controlled room with an alternating 12‐hr/12‐hr light/dark cycle. Animals were euthanized with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital injected intraperitoneally (Dolethal, Vetoquinol®, Especialidades Veterinarias, S.A., Madrid, Spain).
Acute ocular hypertension induction
This technique has already been described in detail previously (Huang et al. 2007, 2008; Zhang et al. 2009; Chi et al. 2014). Briefly, animals were anesthetized using a mixture of xylazine (10 mg/kg body weight, Rompun; Bayer, Kiel, Germany) and ketamine administered intraperitoneally (60 mg/kg body weight, Ketolar; Pfizer, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain). Additionally, topical anaesthesia was achieved with 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride eye drops (Alcon Co., Fort Worth, TX, USA). A 30‐gauge infusion needle connected to a 500‐ml plastic bottle of sterile saline was placed into the anterior chamber of the left eye. By lifting the infusion bottle to a height of 150 cm above the level of the eye, IOP was elevated to 110 mmHg for a period of 60 min. Intra‐ocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Tono‐Pen (Tono‐Pen; Medtronic Co., Dublin, Ireland), following previously described methods (Salinas‐Navarro et al. 2010; Ortín‐Martínez et al. 2015; Valiente‐Soriano et al. 2015a,b). Care was taken not to injure the lens and the iris during the experiment, and animals with an impaired lens were excluded from the study. After 60 min, the infusion needle was removed from the anterior chamber. The right retinas of these animals served as control group. All animals were killed 7 days after the induction of IOP elevation; such a survival interval was chosen because, as shown here and in accordance with previous studies, at this time–point, AOH causes RGC death and microglial activation (Leung et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2012b). The number of retinas used in each analysis is detailed in results.
Retinas were freshly dissected and immediately frozen. Total retinal RNA was extracted using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA, USA). Quantity and purity of the RNA were assessed using the DW‐K5500 micro‐spectrophotometer (Drawell International Technology Co., Ltd. Shanghai, China). A ratio of 260/A280 ≥ 1.5 and a ratio of A260/A230 ≥ 1 indicated an acceptable RNA purity, and an RNA Integrity Number (RIN) value of ≥7 as assessed by the Agilent 2200 RNA assay (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) indicated an acceptable RNA integrity. The screening of the miRNA expression profiling was performed using the commercial Rat miRNA Microarray 1 × 12K kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (RiboBio Ltd., Guangzhou, China). All analyses and annotations were based on the miRbase database release 21.0. To reduce the errors of the microarray analysis, three paired samples were measured and each experimental condition was independently repeated three times. In each of these three biological repetitions, three technical replicas were made. All biological replicates were pooled and calculated to identify differentially expressed miRNAs. A given miRNA was considered differentially expressed in AOH retinas when its fold change was a factor of 2 or more compared to control retinas with a statistical p‐value of <0.05. To directly display the correlations among the replicates and sample conditions, a cluster analysis was performed which was visualized by a Z‐score.
qRT‐PCR validation
Total retinal RNA was extracted as above. Retrotranscription primers (steem loop) and qPCR primers (forward and reverse) for each miRNA were designed by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China; Punj et al. 2010). Two micrograms of total RNA was reversely transcribed with moloney murineleukaemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Quantitative PCRs were performed with Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix‐UDG reagents (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using the PRISM 7900HT system (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). U6 snRNA was used as endogenous control for the quantification of miRNAs (Liu et al. 2012a). Each sample was measured three times. The selected miRNAs are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
miRNAs selected for qRT‐PCR validation
miRNA
Accession number
Amplicon size(bp)
Sequence
rno‐miR‐1‐3p
MIMAT0003125
22
UGGAAUGUAAAGAAGUGUGUAU
rno‐miR‐190a‐5p
MIMAT0000865
22
UGAUAUGUUUGAUAUAUUAGGU
rno‐miR‐539‐5p
MIMAT0003176
22
GGAGAAAUUAUCCUUGGUGUGU
rno‐miR‐17‐5p
MIMAT0000786
23
CAAAGUGCUUACAGUGCAGGUAG
rno‐miR‐215
MIMAT0003118
22
AUGACCUAUGAUUUGACAGACA
rno‐miR‐628
MIMAT0012836
22
AUGCUGACAUAUUUACGAGAGG
rno‐miR‐22‐3p
MIMAT0000791
22
AAGCUGCCAGUUGAAGAACUGU
rno‐miR‐350
MIMAT0000604
24
UUCACAAAGCCCAUACACUUUCAC
rno‐miR‐336‐5p
MIMAT0000576
21
UCACCCUUCCAUAUCUAGUCU
rno‐miR‐93‐5p
MIMAT0000817
23
CAAAGUGCUGUUCGUGCAGGUAG
rno‐miR‐532‐3p
MIMAT0005323
22
CCUCCCACACCCAAGGCUUGCA
rno‐miR‐124
MIMAT0000828
20
UAAGGCACGCGGUGAAUGCC
miRNAs selected for qRT‐PCR validation
In silico pathway analysis
To comprehensively predict the target genes of the validated miRNAs, targetscan (www.targetscan.org/), mirwalk (http://zmf.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/apps/zmf/mirwalk2/) and mirdb (http://mirdb.org/miRDB/) free databases were used. Only their intersection was regarded as target genes. Each gene was assigned to an appropriate signalling pathway according to its main cellular function. The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery 6.7 (DAVID; https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) was used for gene ontology analysis. Signalling pathway analysis was performed using the microarray gene pathway annotations acquired from Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, http://www.genome.jp/kegg/). Pathways with a p‐value of <0.05 were chosen as significantly regulated. All statistical analyses were performed applying Fisher's exact test, and the p‐values were adjusted using the false discovery rate algorithm for the microarray analysis of miRNAs (Zhang et al. 2012).
Western blotting
Retinas were fresh‐dissected and homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) supplemented with 100 mm PMSF. Protein concentration was assessed using BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beijing CoWin Bioscience Co., LTD. Beijing, China). Samples containing equal amounts of protein (20–50 μg) were separated in 8 or 12% sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) and then transferred to PVDF membranes. Proteins were blocked with 5% non‐fat milk in PBS for 1 hr and then incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: rabbit antiphosphorylated‐p38 MAP kinase (Thr180/Tyr182, 1:500 dilution. sc‐17852‐R), rabbit antitotal p38 MAP kinase (1:500; sc‐7149), goat anti‐tumour necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) (1:500; sc‐1350) and rabbit anti‐iNOS (1:800; sc‐650) purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies. Secondary detection was performed with horseradish‐conjugated antibodies (1:5000 or 1:10 000, from Beijing Biosynthesis Biotechnology). Signal was visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Millipore,Jaffrey, NH, USA). Membranes were exposed to X‐ray films that were scanned using a molecular dynamic densitometer (Scion, Frederick, MD, USA). Then Quality One software (Bio‐Rad, Philadelphia, PA, USA) was used for the densitometric analysis. β‐Actin (1:500, sc‐130656; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) was used as loading control.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed using the programs of spss (version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and graph pad prism (version 5.0 Graph Pad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Acute ocular hypertension (AOH) and control groups were compared with each other using the Student's t‐test. A p value of <0.05 was considered to be statistical significant.
Results
RGC loss, axonal degeneration and microglial activation
Examination of the retinal whole mounts 7 days after the induction of AOH revealed that the density of RGCs was significantly lower in the Acute ocular hypertension (AOH) retinas compared to the control ones. In control retinas, the total number of Brn3a+RGCs was 81 451 ± 3383 (mean ± standard deviation; n = 6), while in AOH retinas, this number decreased to 64 143 ± 6229 (n = 6), which accounts for a loss of approximately 21.3% of RGCs (Fig. 1).
Figure 1
Seven days after induction of AOH, there is a diffuse loss of retinal ganglion cells. (A‐A') Retinal photomontages showing Brn3a+
RGCs in a control (A, left) and an experimental (A, right) retina and their isodensity maps (A'). Maps in this figure show that in control retinas, RGCs are denser in the medial–central retina, being densest above of the optic nerve. A diffuse loss of RGCs is observed after AOH. At the bottom of each map is shown the number of RGCs quantified in its corresponding retina. Density colour scale is shown at the bottom of panel A' right and goes from 0 RGCs/mm2 (purple) to ≥3500 RGCs/mm2 (red). (B) Bar graph showing the mean ± standard deviation of RGCs in control and AOH retinas (n = 6/group). The loss of RGCs in the AOH retinas is significant compared to control (t‐test, p‐value <0.0001). AOH, acute ocular hypertension; S, superior; N, nasal; T, temporal; I, inferior.
Seven days after induction of AOH, there is a diffuse loss of retinal ganglion cells. (A‐A') Retinal photomontages showing Brn3a+
RGCs in a control (A, left) and an experimental (A, right) retina and their isodensity maps (A'). Maps in this figure show that in control retinas, RGCs are denser in the medial–central retina, being densest above of the optic nerve. A diffuse loss of RGCs is observed after AOH. At the bottom of each map is shown the number of RGCs quantified in its corresponding retina. Density colour scale is shown at the bottom of panel A' right and goes from 0 RGCs/mm2 (purple) to ≥3500 RGCs/mm2 (red). (B) Bar graph showing the mean ± standard deviation of RGCs in control and AOH retinas (n = 6/group). The loss of RGCs in the AOH retinas is significant compared to control (t‐test, p‐value <0.0001). AOH, acute ocular hypertension; S, superior; N, nasal; T, temporal; I, inferior.In control retinas, pNFH+ intraretinal axons were constricted to the central and middle regions of the retina and had a rectilinear morphology (Fig. 2, 2A). In contrast, in the AOH retinas, the pNFH signal extended to the periphery of the retinas, with the presence of abnormal expression of pNFH within cell bodies and primary dendrites of RGCs. In addition, there were many intra‐axonal deposits of pNFH shaped like small varicosities and rosary beads (Fig. 2B). All these findings are compatible with an axonal injury and have been previously observed after axotomy (Vidal‐Sanz et al. 1987; Villegas‐Pérez et al. 1988; Parrilla‐Reverter et al. 2009) or ocular hypertension (Salinas‐Navarro et al. 2009, 2010; Vidal‐Sanz et al. 2012).
Figure 2
Acute ocular hypertension (AOH) causes the degeneration of RGC intraretinal axons. Retinal photomontages showing pNFH
+ intraretinal RGC axons in a control and an experimental retina. Below each photomontage is shown a magnification of the squared areas (A, B). In control retinas, pNFH expression is restricted to the middle and central retina while after AOH extends to the periphery. The abnormal pNFH expression in the AOH retinas depicts intensely stained RGCs (red arrows) as well as beaded axons (white arrows), showing the typical features of AOH‐induced retrograde axonal degeneration.
Acute ocular hypertension (AOH) causes the degeneration of RGC intraretinal axons. Retinal photomontages showing pNFH
+ intraretinal RGC axons in a control and an experimental retina. Below each photomontage is shown a magnification of the squared areas (A, B). In control retinas, pNFH expression is restricted to the middle and central retina while after AOH extends to the periphery. The abnormal pNFH expression in the AOH retinas depicts intensely stained RGCs (red arrows) as well as beaded axons (white arrows), showing the typical features of AOH‐induced retrograde axonal degeneration.Microglial cells in control retinas were present as ‘resting’ ramified microglia with several processes. However, in the AOH retinas, microglial cells changed to an amoeboid shape indicative of their activated state (Fig. 3A; Jonas et al. 2012; de Hoz et al. 2013). Furthermore, in the ganglion cell layer of the AOH retinas (Fig. 3B), the density of microglial cells was almost twofold of control retinas.
Figure 3
Increased number of microglial cells in the ganglion cell layer after acute ocular hypertension (AOH). (A) Magnifications from flat‐mounted retinas immunodetected for Brn3a (RGCs) and Iba1 (microglial cells) and focused on the ganglion cell layer. In control retinas, microglial cells are ramified and evenly distributed. In AOH retinas, microglial cells are amoeboid, less ramified and more abundant. (B) Graphs showing the mean density (left) and the calculated total number (right) ±standard deviation of microglial cells in control or AOH retinas (see Methods for details). The number of microglial cells in the AOH retinas is significantly higher than in control retinas (n = 6/group; t‐test, pvalue <0.0003).
Increased number of microglial cells in the ganglion cell layer after acute ocular hypertension (AOH). (A) Magnifications from flat‐mounted retinas immunodetected for Brn3a (RGCs) and Iba1 (microglial cells) and focused on the ganglion cell layer. In control retinas, microglial cells are ramified and evenly distributed. In AOH retinas, microglial cells are amoeboid, less ramified and more abundant. (B) Graphs showing the mean density (left) and the calculated total number (right) ±standard deviation of microglial cells in control or AOH retinas (see Methods for details). The number of microglial cells in the AOH retinas is significantly higher than in control retinas (n = 6/group; t‐test, pvalue <0.0003).
miRNA regulation
When the AOH eyes (study group) were compared with the contralateral eyes without IOP change (control group), we detected 31 miRNAs which were differentially expressed, that is the degree of expression differed by a factor of ≥2. In the study group, among these 31 miRNAs, 9 miRNAs were upregulated and 22 miRNAs were downregulated (Fig. 4). The validity of the microarray analysis was verified by qRT‐PCR, and the regulation trend for all validated miRNA was in correspondence with the results from the microarray profiling (Fig. 5). Of note, we performed qRT‐PCR of miR‐124 because, even though it was not regulated in the array analysis, it is expressed by microglial cells (Caldeira et al. 2014) and upregulated in a model of oxygen–glucose deprivation (Kong et al. 2014). As seen in Fig. 5, there was no change of miR‐124 between control and AOH retinas. This is further discussed below.
Figure 4
Heat map of miRNA expression profiles. Thirty‐one miRNAs significantly changed between the AOH and control retinas. Significant upregulation or downregulation of each miRNA was determined as fold changes >2.0 and the values are shown at the right. Red indicates high expression level, and green indicates low expression level.
Figure 5
qRT‐PCR validation of regulated miRNAs. (A) Upregulated miRNAs. (B) Downregulated miRNAs. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 5 retinas/group, **p < 0.01. AOH, acute ocular hypertension.
Heat map of miRNA expression profiles. Thirty‐one miRNAs significantly changed between the AOH and control retinas. Significant upregulation or downregulation of each miRNA was determined as fold changes >2.0 and the values are shown at the right. Red indicates high expression level, and green indicates low expression level.qRT‐PCR validation of regulated miRNAs. (A) Upregulated miRNAs. (B) Downregulated miRNAs. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 5 retinas/group, **p < 0.01. AOH, acute ocular hypertension.
In silico prediction of regulated pathways: Upregulation of proinflammatory proteins
Three prediction‐free databases of microRNA targets (targetscan, mirwalk and mirdb) were applied to disclose the integrated miRNA‐target and gene ontology analysis. After, based on biological process and molecular function, the resulting data were used to uncover the miRNA‐Gene Regulatory Network (Figs 6 and 7). This analysis revealed that every miRNA had multiple gene targets and each target gene was regulated by more than one miRNA. In a next step, we performed a pathway analysis using DAVID and KEGG platforms, to clarify the putative pathways in which the miRNAs were involved (Tables 2 and 3). The upregulated miRNAs were ascribed to five functional clusters and the downregulated miRNAs to nine functional clusters (Tables 2 and 3). For a subsequent analysis, we focused on the MAPK pathway which had 18 genes that, according to the bioinformatics analysis, may be targets of the regulated miRNAs. Thus, we performed Western blotting of three proteins linked to the MAPK pathway, stress and inflammation. As shown in Fig. 8, AOH upregulated the stress kinase p38 and the production of inflammatory proteins iNOS and TNF‐α. These upregulations concord with the observed increase and activation of microglial cells.
Figure 6
Interaction network of downregulated miRNAs and their target genes. The target genes were predicted by three computational programs targetscan, mirwalk and mirdb. Red circles: microRNAs. Yellow circles: important target genes.
Figure 7
Interaction network of upregulated miRNAs and their target genes. The target genes were predicted by three computational programs targetscan, mirwalk and mirdb. Red circles: microRNAs. Yellow circles: important target genes.
Table 2
Enriched signalling pathways predicted to be regulated by the downregulated miRNAs (KEGG pathway categories)
Term
Number of genes
p Value
Chemokine signalling pathway
15
0.002
Fc gamma R‐mediated phagocytosis
9
0.002
MAPK signalling pathway
18
0.003
TGF‐beta signalling pathway
9
0.007
GnRH signalling pathway
9
0.008
Cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction
14
0.013
Neurotrophin signalling pathway
10
0.014
SNARE interactions in vesicular transport
5
0.025
Apoptosis
9
0.036
Table 3
Enriched signalling pathways predicted to be regulated by the upregulated miRNAs (KEGG pathway categories)
Term
Number of genes
p Value
Cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction
22
0.0008
Chemokine signalling pathway
18
0.0052
Natural killer cell‐mediated cytotoxicity
11
0.0280
Leucocyte transendothelial migration
12
0.0290
Cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)
14
0.0340
Figure 8
Upregulation of MAPK and inflammation‐related proteins. (A) Western blots from control and acute ocular hypertension retinal extracts (n = 6/group). TNF‐α, iNOS were normalized with respect to β‐actin, and the phosphorylated p38 MAP kinase (p‐p38) with respect to its total (t‐p38). (B) Densitometric analysis. **p < 0.01.
Interaction network of downregulated miRNAs and their target genes. The target genes were predicted by three computational programs targetscan, mirwalk and mirdb. Red circles: microRNAs. Yellow circles: important target genes.Interaction network of upregulated miRNAs and their target genes. The target genes were predicted by three computational programs targetscan, mirwalk and mirdb. Red circles: microRNAs. Yellow circles: important target genes.Enriched signalling pathways predicted to be regulated by the downregulated miRNAs (KEGG pathway categories)Enriched signalling pathways predicted to be regulated by the upregulated miRNAs (KEGG pathway categories)Upregulation of MAPK and inflammation‐related proteins. (A) Western blots from control and acute ocular hypertension retinal extracts (n = 6/group). TNF‐α, iNOS were normalized with respect to β‐actin, and the phosphorylated p38 MAP kinase (p‐p38) with respect to its total (t‐p38). (B) Densitometric analysis. **p < 0.01.
Discussion
In our experimental study on rats with an acutely elevated IOP to supradiastolic pressure levels for a period of one hour, a significant loss in retinal ganglion cells was associated with an activation of retinal microglial cells and an upregulation or downregulation of 31 miRNAs. Some of these miRNAs were involved in various biological processes including regulation of neuron apoptosis and inflammatory pathways.The findings obtained in our study agree with results of previous investigations showing that a short‐term increase in IOP to values of 100 mmHg or higher can lead to marked retinal damage with resulting loss in RGCs and axonal degeneration (Selles‐Navarro et al. 1996; Naskar et al. 2002; Zhang et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2012b). Our results are also in agreement with previous studies showing that damage to RGCs is associated with an activation of retinal microglial cells (Salvador‐Silva et al. 2000; Sobrado‐Calvo et al. 2007; Gallego et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2012b; de Hoz et al. 2013; Abbott et al. 2014; Rojas et al. 2014). In addition, our miRNA analysis revealed, through a bioinformatics analysis, a cluster of signalling pathways predicted to be regulated by the differentially expressed miRNAs. Various cellular activities in mammals including innate immunity, cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis or survival, and inflammation can be regulated by the top signalling pathways.The mitogen‐activated protein kinases (MAPKs) signalling pathways were enriched signalling pathways possibly regulated by the differentially expressed miRNAs, for instance miR‐350/MAPK14, miR‐539/MAP3K8, miR‐93/MAPK9. The MAPKs pathways include the c‐Jun NH2‐terminal kinase, p38 MAP kinase and extracellular signal‐regulated kinase and are involved in a wide variety of cellular processes. For instance, in vascular tissue, it has been shown that the activation of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR survival signalling pathway with a concomitant suppression of the p38 MAPK proapoptotic pathway protects the endothelium against stress‐induced apoptosis (Joshi et al. 2005). Furthermore, the compromised MAPKs pathways contribute to the pathology of many neurodegenerative diseases (Kim & Choi 2015). Our findings showed accelerated p38 MAP kinase in the AOH eyes. Activated p38 MAP kinase causes the release of inflammatory factors, whose accumulation induces a cascade of events leading to inflammation and RGC death. The differentially expressed miRNAs and abnormally activated p38 MAP kinase provides a potential way to suppress the inflammation and prevent RGC damage caused by acute IOP elevation.The differentially expressed miRNAs are assumed to influence the function of microglia by regulating specific cell signalling pathway, such as chemokine signalling pathway and TGF‐beta signalling pathway. The prevailing phenotype of retinal microglia is the resting phenotype M2, which is able to release high levels of anti‐inflammatory cytokines, associated with recovery, repair and neuroprotection in retinal development and various other retinal disorders. Following injuries, retinal microglia cells change into an activated phenotype M1, which can produce proinflammatory factors and contribute to retinal dysfunctions. Retinal microglial cells M1 and M2 can transform from each other upon different types of stimulation, a process known as ‘polarization’. Several miRNAs have been shown to be important regulators of microglial polarization and play a critical role in the microglia‐mediated neuroinflammation (Su et al. 2016).miR‐124 is expressed in microglia, where it has a role in maintaining the microglial cells in a quiescent state and is critical for the switching from M1 type to M2 types of retinal microglial cells (Caldeira et al. 2014). Upregulation of miR‐124 may play a protective role against neural apoptosis (Sun et al. 2013). Significant upregulation of miR‐124 was found in oxygen–glucose deprivation model (Kong et al. 2014). In our study, we did not detect a statistically significant change in the expression of miR‐124 (Fig. 5). Because of the role of this particular miRNA in microglial quiescence, it is possible that its upregulation occurs if the increase in IOP becomes chronic. This hypothesis would explain why miR124 is not regulated in our model of AOH although it is important to have in mind that we have only examined miRNAs at 7 days after AOH, which is a limitation of the present study.Many of the differentially expressed miRNAs are considered to modulate microglia activation and thus involved in the regulation of proinflammatory cytokines production. The target genes of miR‐93‐5p, one significantly downregulated miRNA in the AOH eyes, included MAPK9, MAP3K12, caspase 3 and others. MiR‐93‐5p has been acknowledged as a negative regulator of the immune response and can inhibit nuclear factor‐kappa B (NF‐κB) activation and proinflammatory cytokines (Lyu et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2014). miR‐17‐5p, which was detected to be downregulated in our study group, has also been considered to be a regulatory intermediate of multiple MAPKs (Cloonan et al. 2008). miR‐17‐5p could promote cell migration through targeting the P38 MAPK pathway (Yang et al. 2010). Moreover, overexpression of miR‐17‐5p was able to enhance cell proliferation by promoting G1/S transition of the cell cycle and inhibiting apoptosis in cancer cell lines (Li et al. 2015).Except for the extensively studied miRNAs, some of the differentially expressed miRNAs are reported to regulate the proliferation, invasion and apoptosis of other types of cells. MiR‐144, one upregulated miRNA in the acute glaucoma eyes, plays a key role in the occurrence and development of tumours, especially in the early stage of tumour formation. One of its targets is the insulin receptor substrate (IRS1) that plays important biological functions for both metabolic and mitogenic pathways and activating signalling pathways, including the PI3K pathway and the MAP kinase pathway (Joshi et al. 2005). Upregulation of miR‐144 could inhibit A549 cell proliferation and reduce its invasion and migration, suggesting that miR‐144 might be a tumour suppressor gene in lung cancer (Zhang et al. 2015). Therefore, we speculate that upregulation of miR‐144 might be a compensatory mechanism and miR‐144 might also inhibit microglia activation, proliferation and migration. However, there is no related information about the function of miR‐144 in the microglia cell and further study is needed in the future.The differentially expressed miRNAs are also involved in the regulation of neural apoptosis. TGF‐beta signalling pathway, neurotrophin signalling pathway and natural killer cell‐mediated cytotoxicity pathway were supposed to be regulated by differentially expressed miRNAs. Some of the differentially expressed miRNAs have been considered as apoptosis‐related miRNAs. MiR‐592 has been thought to be a key regulator of the neurotrophin receptor p75 (NTR), which had been implicated in mediating neuronal apoptosis during injury. A previous study showed that the expression level of miR‐592 decreased in neuronal ischaemic injury and overexpression of miR‐592 in neurons could decrease the degree of ischaemic injury and attenuate activation of proapoptotic signalling and death in neuronal cells. Interestingly, the expression change of miR‐592 in our study was highly consistent with that in focal cerebral ischaemia, which suggested that miR‐592 may also influence the apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in eyes after an acute IOP elevation (Irmady et al. 2014).In summary, an acute IOP elevation led to changes in the expression of miRNAs, whose target genes were associated with the regulation of microglia‐mediated neuroinflammation or neural apoptosis. As miRNAs are highly conserved in mammals, the findings from our investigation on rats may cautiously be transferred onto the situation in humans and may lead to a better understanding of the contribution of miRNAs to the consequences of an AOH. Addressing miRNAs in the process of retinal ischaemia and ON damage in association with high IOP may open new avenues in preventing RGC apoptosis and loss and may serve as target for future therapeutic regimen in acute glaucoma.
Authors: Na Liu; Nian-Yong Chen; Rui-Xue Cui; Wen-Fei Li; Yan Li; Rong-Rong Wei; Mei-Yin Zhang; Ying Sun; Bi-Jun Huang; Mo Chen; Qing-Mei He; Ning Jiang; Lei Chen; William C S Cho; Jing-Ping Yun; Jing Zeng; Li-Zhi Liu; Li Li; Ying Guo; Hui-Yun Wang; Jun Ma Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Krithi Irmady; Katherine A Jackman; Victoria A Padow; Neelam Shahani; Laura Andres Martin; Leandro Cerchietti; Klaus Unsicker; Costantino Iadecola; Barbara L Hempstead Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Francisco M Nadal-Nicolás; Manuel Jiménez-López; Manuel Salinas-Navarro; Paloma Sobrado-Calvo; Juan J Alburquerque-Béjar; Manuel Vidal-Sanz; Marta Agudo-Barriuso Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rahul A Jonas; Ti-Fei Yuan; Yu-Xiang Liang; Jost B Jonas; David K C Tay; Rutledge G Ellis-Behnke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Manuel Vidal-Sanz; Francisco M Nadal-Nicolás; Francisco J Valiente-Soriano; Marta Agudo-Barriuso; Maria P Villegas-Pérez Journal: Neural Regen Res Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.135
Authors: Manuel Vidal-Sanz; Caridad Galindo-Romero; Francisco J Valiente-Soriano; Francisco M Nadal-Nicolás; Arturo Ortin-Martinez; Giuseppe Rovere; Manuel Salinas-Navarro; Fernando Lucas-Ruiz; Maria C Sanchez-Migallon; Paloma Sobrado-Calvo; Marcelino Aviles-Trigueros; María P Villegas-Pérez; Marta Agudo-Barriuso Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 4.677