Literature DB >> 27535065

A drop in performance on a fluid intelligence test due to instructed-rule mindset.

Hadas ErEl1,2, Nachshon Meiran3.   

Abstract

A 'mindset' is a configuration of processing resources that are made available for the task at hand as well as their suitable tuning for carrying it out. Of special interest, remote-relation abstract mindsets are introduced by activities sharing only general control processes with the task. To test the effect of a remote-relation mindset on performance on a Fluid Intelligence test (Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices, RAPM), we induced a mindset associated with little usage of executive processing by requiring participants to execute a well-defined classification rule 12 times, a manipulation known from previous work to drastically impair rule-generation performance and associated cognitive processes. In Experiment 1, this manipulation led to a drop in RAPM performance equivalent to 10.1 IQ points. No drop was observed in a General Knowledge task. In Experiment 2, a similar drop in RAPM performance was observed (equivalent to 7.9 and 9.2 IQ points) regardless if participants were pre-informed about the upcoming RAPM test. These results indicate strong (most likely, transient) adverse effects of a remote-relation mindset on test performance. They imply that although the trait of Fluid Intelligence has probably not changed, mindsets can severely distort estimates of this trait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27535065     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-016-0796-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  32 in total

1.  How positive affect modulates cognitive control: reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments.

Authors:  Richard E Nisbett; Joshua Aronson; Clancy Blair; William Dickens; James Flynn; Diane F Halpern; Eric Turkheimer
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2012-01-02

3.  How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Hilde Haider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  The expected value of control: an integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Training effects on Raven's progressive matrices in young, middle-aged, and elderly adults.

Authors:  N W Denney; S M Heidrich
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1990-03

6.  A neural model of rule generation in inductive reasoning.

Authors:  Daniel Rasmussen; Chris Eliasmith
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-01

7.  Mechanisms of rule acquisition and rule following in inductive reasoning.

Authors:  Cristiano Crescentini; Shima Seyed-Allaei; Nicola De Pisapia; Jorge Jovicich; Daniele Amati; Tim Shallice
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, and the registration of decision costs.

Authors:  Joseph T McGuire; Matthew M Botvinick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Authors:  F G Ashby; L A Alfonso-Reese; A U Turken; E M Waldron
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Deep thinking increases task-set shielding and reduces shifting flexibility in dual-task performance.

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.