Literature DB >> 27534916

Histomorphometric results of different grafting materials and effect of healing time on bone maturation after sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

S A Danesh-Sani1, S P Engebretson1, M N Janal2.   

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate histomorphometric variables, the amount of new bone (NB), residual graft (RG) particles and soft tissue (ST), related to various grafting materials and assess the effect of graft healing time on different histomorphometric outcomes. Studies that were published before October 2015 were electronically and manually searched in three databases. We included human studies that reported the amount of NB, RG and ST in the biopsies taken from the grafted sinuses. Based on the applied grafting materials, extracted data were categorized into different groups. Furthermore, extracted data were classified into three groups based on healing time: (i) ≤ 4.5 mo; (ii) 4.5-9 mo; and (iii) ≥ 9-13.5 mo. The search provided 791 titles. Full text analysis was performed for 258 articles resulting in 136 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Autogenous bone (AB) resulted in the highest amount of NB and lowest amount of RG compared to other grafting materials. Based on this meta-analysis, a significant difference was noticed in the amount of NB formation in grafts with a healing time of > 4.5 mo when compared to the grafts with less healing time. However, when comparing biopsies taken at 4.5-9 mo of healing (average = 6.22 mo) to the ones taken at ≥ 9-13.5 mo (average = 10.36 mo), no significant difference was noticed in the amount of NB formation of various grafts except allografts that resulted in a significantly higher percentage of NB at 9.5 mo of healing. Based on histomorphometric analysis, AB results in the highest amount of NB formation in comparison to the other grafting materials. Bone substitute materials (allografts, alloplastic materials and xenografts) seem to be good alternatives to autogenous bone and can be considered as grafting materials to avoid disadvantages related to AB, including morbidity rate, limited availability and high volumetric change. Combining AB with alloplastic materials and xenografts brings no significant advantages regarding NB formation.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomaterials; bone regeneration; guided bone regeneration; histomorphometry; maxillary sinus floor augmentation; sinus floor augmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27534916     DOI: 10.1111/jre.12402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontal Res        ISSN: 0022-3484            Impact factor:   4.419


  34 in total

1.  Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Sinus Floor Augmentation Using Biomimetic Octacalcium Phosphate Alloplasts: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Seok-Jun Kim; Joo-Seong Kim; Woong Kim; Suk-Young Kim; Won-Pyo Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 2.  Relative performance of various biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bálint Trimmel; Noémi Gede; Péter Hegyi; Zsolt Szakács; Gyöngyi Anna Mezey; Eszter Varga; Márton Kivovics; Lilla Hanák; Zoltán Rumbus; György Szabó
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Histologic and Histomorphometric Comparison between Sintered Nanohydroxyapatite and Anorganic Bovine Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Grafting: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Teresa Lombardi; Francesco Oreglia; Andrea Alberghini Maltoni; Tonino Traini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Implant Stability of Biological Hydroxyapatites Used in Dentistry.

Authors:  Maria Piedad Ramírez Fernández; Sergio A Gehrke; Patricia Mazón; Jose L Calvo-Guirado; Piedad N De Aza
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: a Review of Selected Treatment Modalities.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Janek Dalsgaard Jensen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2017-09-30

6.  Comparison of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures: Material Characterization and In Vivo Behavior.

Authors:  María Piedad Ramírez Fernández; Patricia Mazón; Sergio A Gehrke; Jose Luis Calvo-Guirado; Piedad N De Aza
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Morse Taper Connection Implants Placed in Grafted Sinuses in 65 Patients: A Retrospective Clinical Study with 10 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Francesco Mangano; Renata Bakaj; Irene Frezzato; Alberto Frezzato; Sergio Montini; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-08-07

8.  SEM-EDX Study of the Degradation Process of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures.

Authors:  María Piedad Ramírez Fernández; Sergio A Gehrke; Carlos Pérez Albacete Martinez; Jose L Calvo Guirado; Piedad N de Aza
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Esterified Hyaluronic Acid Fibers on Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvarial Defects.

Authors:  Omer B Agrali; Selin Yildirim; Hafize O Ozener; Kemal N Köse; Dilek Ozbeyli; Merva Soluk-Tekkesin; Leyla Kuru
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Comparative Histological and Histomorphometric Results of Six Biomaterials Used in Two-Stage Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Model after 6-Month Healing.

Authors:  Gerardo La Monaca; Giovanna Iezzi; Maria Paola Cristalli; Nicola Pranno; Gian Luca Sfasciotti; Iole Vozza
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.