| Literature DB >> 27534895 |
Pierre Hirsch1,2,3,4, Yanyan Zhang5,6, Ruoping Tang4, Virginie Joulin5,6, Hélène Boutroux1,2,3,7, Elodie Pronier6, Hannah Moatti1,2,3, Pascale Flandrin1,2,3, Christophe Marzac8, Dominique Bories9, Fanny Fava1, Hayat Mokrani6, Aline Betems6, Florence Lorre10, Rémi Favier8, Frédéric Féger8, Mohamad Mohty1,3, Luc Douay1,2,8, Ollivier Legrand1,2,3,4, Chrystèle Bilhou-Nabera1,2,3,8, Fawzia Louache5,6, François Delhommeau1,2,3,8.
Abstract
In acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) initiating pre-leukaemic lesions can be identified through three major hallmarks: their early occurrence in the clone, their persistence at relapse and their ability to initiate multilineage haematopoietic repopulation and leukaemia in vivo. Here we analyse the clonal composition of a series of AML through these characteristics. We find that not only DNMT3A mutations, but also TET2, ASXL1 mutations, core-binding factor and MLL translocations, as well as del(20q) mostly fulfil these criteria. When not eradicated by AML treatments, pre-leukaemic cells with these lesions can re-initiate the leukaemic process at various stages until relapse, with a time-dependent increase in clonal variegation. Based on the nature, order and association of lesions, we delineate recurrent genetic hierarchies of AML. Our data indicate that first lesions, variegation and treatment selection pressure govern the expansion and adaptive behaviour of the malignant clone, shaping AML in a time-dependent manner.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27534895 PMCID: PMC4992157 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Single-cell-derived colony analysis identifies a recurrent order of acquisition of AML mutations and chromosomal rearrangements.
(a) Left panel: allele specific (AS) PCR amplification plots of mutant (red) and wild type (blue) alleles in seven colonies from patient UPN2014-001. Asterisks indicate mutant allele detection. Right panel: results of AS assays (rows) in 87 colonies (columns). Mutant colonies are indicated by coloured boxes. Blue: lesions in epigenetic regulators; cyan: lesions involving NPM1, transcription or splicing factors; green: proliferative lesions; pink: other lesions. (b) Mutation order in eight patients with normal karyotype AML. Dashed arrows and hatched circles indicate positions that could not be determined. (c) Analysis of 85 colonies from patient UPN2014-015 as in a. To detect del(20q), an informative single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)(rs11556379) was used. The inferred order of lesions is shown. (d) Genotyping analyses, as in a, and FISH analyses of colonies from patient UPN2014-003. Dissociations of the red and green signals indicate MLL rearrangements. Nuclei were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Bars indicate 10 μm. Right panel: results of FISH and AS assays, as in a. The inferred order of lesions is shown. (e) Order of lesions in five additional abnormal karyotype AMLs.
Figure 2Temporal variegation govern AML relapse.
(a) Clonal composition of 22 AMLs at diagnosis and relapse. Internally tangent circles represent successive lesions. Arrows indicate subclonal evolution inferred as indicated in the material and methods section. Delay from diagnosis to relapse is indicated in the upper right corner of each panel (m, months; y, years). (b) Numbers of stable and variegating lesions between diagnosis and relapse samples in the 22 AMLs. Colours are as in (a) with TP53 mutations included in the group of ‘other lesions'. (c) Changes in clonal composition as a function of time to relapse. Droplets above and below the x axis represent the number of variegating and stable lesions, respectively. Paired droplets of single patients are connected by vertical lines. Droplets outlined by dashed lines indicate lesions from one patient whose relapse lesions (top droplet) were all different from diagnostic ones (bottom droplet). Grey circles indicate cases with no changes in clonal composition.
Figure 3Retention of lesions in remission samples defines reservoirs for persistent clonal haematopoiesis and relapse
(a) Sequence traces of paired diagnostic and remission samples from three AML patients with DNMT3A and TET2 mutations. Arrows indicate the detection of mutant alleles. (b) FISH analysis of diagnosis and remission samples from patient UPN2014-015 with persistence of del(20q). Presence of one instead of two red+green signals indicates del(20q)(outlined nuclei). Bars indicate 10 μm. (c) Kinetics of fraction of interphasic nuclei with del(20q) and VAFs of U2AF1 and RET mutations determined by targeted or deep sequencing in samples from patient UPN2014-015. Black dashed lines over shaded areas delimit the maximum background error rate for single nucleotide variant detection of patient specific mutations by deep sequencing, and the 0.01 limit of detection for the gene panel targeted sequencing. Different time points of follow-up are marked by arrows. (d) Kinetics of lesions in six additional patients as in (c). MLL-AF6 transcript quantification in patient UPN2014-038 was monitored by quantitative reverse transcription–PCR with a limit of detection of 0.01.
Figure 4AMLs with early epigenetic lesions have leukaemic and non-leukaemic repopulation capacities in NSG mice.
(a) Percentages of human CD45+ (hCD45+) cells in the bone marrow of NSG mice 8–43 weeks after injection of 5 × 106 mononuclear cells from 38 AML blood samples. The presence of candidate pre-leukaemic lesions in injected cells is indicated in the co-mutation table. (b) Flow cytometric analysis of NSG bone marrow repopulated with non-leukaemic (UPN2014-019, UPN2015-021) and leukaemic (UPN2014-043) cells. (c) Repopulation of NSG bone marrow by shRNA TET2 or scramble transduced cord blood CD34+ cells. Bars indicate the median (Mann–Whitney test). (d) Flow cytometric analysis of the bone marrow from two representative mice transplanted with control (shRNA scramble) and TET2 knocked-down (shRNA TET2) cells.
Figure 5Founding lesions define distinct genetic hierarchies and clonal histories in AML.
(a) In 49 patients with lesions in epigenetic regulators first, subsequent events were classified as early intermediate (second to median), late intermediate (median+1 to penultimate) and last event. Histograms show the distribution of events at each chronological position. * indicate P<0.05, Fisher's exact test. (b) Co-mutation table of 72 AMLs at diagnosis. The bottom left colour code indicates the position of each lesion as defined in a; hatched boxes mean ⩾2 lesions at distinct positions. Groups of patients with distinct genetic hierarchies were defined according to the co-occurrence or exclusion of mutations in the three master genes involved in CHIP—DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1—, mutations in NPM1 and in haematopoietic transcription factors—RUNX1, GATA2, CEBPA— and pre-leukaemic chromosomal aberrations—MLL and CBF rearrangements, del(20q). Clonal composition of representative AMLs with distinct genetic hierarchies are shown in boxes surrounding the mutation table. s-AML, secondary AML; t-AML, therapy-related AML. Internally tangent circles represent successive events. Colours are as in Fig. 2a.
Figure 6Capture of early clonal expansion steps by single-cell-derived colony analysis.
(a,b) Genotyping of single cell derived colonies from two de novo AMLs—UPN2014-027, (a) and UPN2015-027, (b)—with concomitant DNMT3A and TP53 mutations, as in Fig. 1. Losses of heterozygosity (LOH) were detected using informative SNPs. Asterisks indicate mutant allele detection or LOH. (c) Mutational patterns of individual colonies from patients with early initiating lesions. Cell sorting strategies before culture are indicated above each table. Dotted lines separate wild-type colonies, colonies with one mutation, and colonies with ⩾2 mutations/lesions. The number of colonies of each category is indicated below the tables.
Figure 7The action of time and treatment selection pressure in the initiation and evolution of AML.
(a) Schematic representation of the initiation and evolution of the malignant clone (coloured areas) at the expense of normal HSPCs (grey area) from the acquisition of the first event to the onset of AML. Left diagrams show AMLs emerging after the occurrence of the first lesions which endow HSPCs with enhanced expansion capacity. Right diagrams depict AMLs with TP53 mutations. For therapy-related AMLs (t-AML), the occurrence and treatment of a first cancer, followed by HSPC depletion and recovery, are indicated. The nature of each lesion is indicated as follows: Epigenetic 1: mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1; Epigenetic 2: Epigenetic 1 or other mutations in epigenetic modifiers; Gene fusions: CBF or MLL translocations; NPM1/TF: mutations in NPM1 or haematopoietic transcription factors; Prolif.: mutation in proliferation/signalling pathways; TP53: TP53 mutations. (b) Post-treatment evolution of AML, according to various outcomes. CHIP, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential.