| Literature DB >> 27534370 |
Neus Oromi1, Johan Michaux2, Mathieu Denoël1.
Abstract
Paedomorphosis and metamorphosis are two major developmental processes that characterize the evolution of complex life cycles in many lineages. Whereas these processes were fixed in some taxa, they remained facultative in others, with alternative phenotypes expressed in the same populations. From a genetic perspective, it is still unknown whether such phenotypes form a single population or whether they show some patterns of isolation in syntopy. This has deep implications for understanding the evolution of the phenotypes, i.e. towards their persistence or their fixation and speciation. Newts and salamanders are excellent models to test this hypothesis because they exhibit both developmental processes in their populations: the aquatic paedomorphs retain gills, whereas the metamorphs are able to colonize land. Using microsatellite data of coexisting paedomorphic and metamorphic palmate newts (Lissotriton helveticus), we found that they formed a panmictic population, which evidences sexual compatibility between the two phenotypes. The high gene flow could be understood as an adaptation to unstable habitats in which phenotypic plasticity is favored over the fixation of developmental alternatives. This makes then possible the persistence of a polyphenism: only metamorphosis could be maintained in case of occasional drying whereas paedomorphosis could offer specific advantages in organisms remaining in water.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27534370 PMCID: PMC4989185 DOI: 10.1038/srep32046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Alternative heterochronic phenotypes in palmate newts.
The aquatic paedomorph (a) retains gills at the adult stage whereas the metamorph (b) is a metamorphosed adult that is adapted for life on land. Photographs by M. Denoël.
Genetic diversity parameters of coexisting paedomorphic and metamorphic palmate newts (Larzac, France).
| Locus | Metamorphs | Paedomorphs | Global population | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | H | H | AR | NA | H | H | AR | NA | H | H | AR | |
| LH1 | 8 (1) | 0.73 | 1.00 | 8.00 | 7 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 7.00 | 8 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 7.47 |
| US9 | 8 (3) | 0.71 | 0.94 | 6.83 | 5 | 0.70 | 0.98 | 4.92 | 8 | 0.70 | 0.95 | 5.80 |
| LH44 | 6 (2) | 0.67 | 0.85 | 5.72 | 5 (1) | 0.64 | 0.85 | 4.72 | 7 | 0.66 | 0.82 | 5.48 |
| LH16 | 5 | 0.65 | 0.98 | 5.00 | 5 | 0.69 | 1.00 | 5.00 | 5 | 0.67 | 0.99 | 4.99 |
| LH19 | 7 (2) | 0.71 | 0.98 | 6.33 | 5 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 4.92 | 7 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 5.67 |
| LH2 | 4 (1) | 0.52 | 1.00 | 3.48 | 3 | 0.51 | 1.00 | 2.72 | 4 | 0.52 | 0.97 | 2.96 |
| LH13 | 4 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 4.00 | 4 | 0.45 | 0.77 | 4.00 | 4 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 3.98 |
| LH14 | 4 (1) | 0.44 | 0.36 | 3.97 | 3 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 2.98 | 4 | 0.41 | 0.26 | 3.69 |
| LH17 | 3 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 2.74 | 3 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 2.71 | 3 | 0.28 | 0.33 | 2.59 |
| US4 | 3 | 0.37 | 0.44 | 3.00 | 3 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 3.00 | 3 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 3.00 |
| Overall | 5.2 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 4.91 | 4.2 | 0.55 | 0.80 | 4.20 | 5.3 | 0.55 | 0.73 | 4.74 |
NA = number of alleles; (n) number of private alleles; He = Expected Heterozygosity; Ho = Observed Heterozygosity with deviation from Hardy–Weinberg proportions (*P < 0.01; **P < 0.001); AR = Allele Richness.
Fixation index (Fis) and genetic differentiation (pairwise Fst values) within and between the coexisting phenotypes (M = metamorphs; P = paedomorphs) of palmate newts (Larzac, France).
| Locus | FIS M | FIS P | FIS Total | FST |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LH1 | −0.363 | −0.326 | −0.344 | −0.006 |
| US9 | −0.330 | −0.362 | −0.346 | −0.005 |
| LH44 | −0.257 | −0.239 | −0.248 | 0.004 |
| LH16 | −0.498 | −0.451 | −0.474 | −0.003 |
| LH19 | −0.373 | −0.362 | −0.368 | −0.004 |
| LH2 | −0.918 | −0.831 | −0.874 | −0.001 |
| LH13 | −0.174 | 0.015 | −0.075 | −0.004 |
| LH14 | 0.187 | 0.549 | 0.359 | −0.011 |
| LH17 | −0.185 | −0.161 | −0.174 | −0.008 |
| US4 | −0.190 | −0.170 | −0.179 | −0.001 |
| Overall | −0.310 | −0.307 | −0.308 | −0.003 |
Figure 2Bayesian population assignment test of paedomorphic and metamorphic palmate newts (Larzac, France).
Each vertical bar in the Y-axis represents an individual, and the color composition displays the probability to belong to one of the clusters defined by STRUCTURE (CLUMPAK plot). The black vertical line delineates the pre-defined populations.