Literature DB >> 27533100

Universal Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis: Additive Value and Clinical Dilemmas in Fetuses with a Normal Karyotype.

Eran Bornstein1, Sharon Berger1, Sau W Cheung2, Kristen T Maliszewski2, Ankita Patel2, Amber N Pursley2, Erez Lenchner3, Carlos Bacino2, Arthur L Beaudet2, Michael Y Divon1.   

Abstract

Objective To assess the additive value of prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for all indications and the likelihood of detecting pathologic copy number variations (CNVs) based on specific indications. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on amniocentesis and chorionic villi sampling results obtained between 2010 and 2014 in a single institution. A total of 3,314 consecutive patients undergoing invasive genetic testing for different indications were offered CMA in addition to standard karyotype. The prevalence of pathologic CNVs was compared between patients with low-risk indications and those with high-risk indications. Likewise, the prevalence of pathologic CNVs among patients with different sonographic abnormalities was calculated and compared with the low-risk group. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for statistical analysis. Results The prevalence of pathologic CNVs was significantly higher in patients with high-risk indications and specifically those with sonographic abnormalities, compared with the low-risk group (2.8 and 5.9% vs. 0.4%, respectively; all p < 0.05). Conclusion Prenatal CMA detected clinically relevant CNVs in fetuses with a normal karyotype. Major structural malformations and nuchal translucency (NT) ≥ 3.0 mm are associated with the highest risk for a CMA abnormality. Nevertheless, the prevalence of pathologic CNVs in the low-risk population was high enough (1:250) to consider genetic counseling in this group. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27533100     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1586501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  4 in total

Review 1.  Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis.

Authors:  Brynn Levy; Ronald Wapner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  ACOG and SMFM guidelines for prenatal diagnosis: Is karyotyping really sufficient?

Authors:  Sara B Hay; Trilochan Sahoo; Mary K Travis; Karine Hovanes; Natasa Dzidic; Charles Doherty; Michelle N Strecker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 3.  Chances and Challenges of New Genetic Screening Technologies (NIPT) in Prenatal Medicine from a Clinical Perspective: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ivonne Bedei; Aline Wolter; Axel Weber; Fabrizio Signore; Roland Axt-Fliedner
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 4.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.