PURPOSE: Methodological paper aiming to describe the development of a digital and self-reported food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), created to the 1982 and 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohorts. METHODS: The instrument was created based on FFQs previously applied to subjects belonging to both cohorts in the 2004 and 2008 follow-ups. The FFQ was developed including 88 foods and/or meals where frequencies were clustered from a minimum of never or once/month to a maximum of greater than or equal to 5 times/day. The closed options related to portions were based on a 24-hour recall previously asked to a subsample from the 1993 cohort. Three options for portions were created: equal to, less than or greater than. Equal to portion was described based on the 50 percentile of each food consumed reported in a 24-hour recall. Photographs of portions related to the 50 percentile for each food were also included in the software. RESULTS: This digital FFQ included food and meals based on the needs of current researches. The layout of the software was attractive to the staff members as well as to the cohort members. The responding time was 12 minutes and the software allowed several individuals to use it at the same time. Moreover, this instrument dismissed interviewers and double data entry. CONCLUSION: It is recommended the use of the same strategy in other studies, adapted to different contexts and situations.
PURPOSE: Methodological paper aiming to describe the development of a digital and self-reported food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), created to the 1982 and 1993 Pelotas Birth Cohorts. METHODS: The instrument was created based on FFQs previously applied to subjects belonging to both cohorts in the 2004 and 2008 follow-ups. The FFQ was developed including 88 foods and/or meals where frequencies were clustered from a minimum of never or once/month to a maximum of greater than or equal to 5 times/day. The closed options related to portions were based on a 24-hour recall previously asked to a subsample from the 1993 cohort. Three options for portions were created: equal to, less than or greater than. Equal to portion was described based on the 50 percentile of each food consumed reported in a 24-hour recall. Photographs of portions related to the 50 percentile for each food were also included in the software. RESULTS: This digital FFQ included food and meals based on the needs of current researches. The layout of the software was attractive to the staff members as well as to the cohort members. The responding time was 12 minutes and the software allowed several individuals to use it at the same time. Moreover, this instrument dismissed interviewers and double data entry. CONCLUSION: It is recommended the use of the same strategy in other studies, adapted to different contexts and situations.
Authors: Caroline Dos Santos Costa; Maria Cecília Formoso Assunção; Christian Loret de Mola; Juliane de Souza Cardoso; Alicia Matijasevich; Aluísio J D Barros; Iná S Santos Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Soyang Kwon; Ana M B Menezes; Ulf Ekelund; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Helen Gonçalves; Bruna Gonçalves C da Silva; Kathleen F Janz Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 8.915
Authors: Ana R O Moreira; Rosangela F L Batista; Lorena L C Ladeira; Erika B A F Thomaz; Claudia M C Alves; Maria C Saraiva; Antonio A M Silva; Mario A Brondani; Cecilia C C Ribeiro Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: F O Meller; M C F Assunção; A A Schäfer; C Loret de Mola; D L Dahly; J S Vaz; F C Barros Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana Maria Baptista Menezes; Paula Duarte Oliveira; Helen Gonçalves; Isabel O Oliveira; Maria Cecilia F Assunção; Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues; Gustavo Dias Ferreira; Fernando César Wehrmeister Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Silvana Paiva Orlandi; Leonardo Pozza Santos; Ana Maria Baptista Menezes; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Helen Gonçalves; Maria Cecília Formoso Assunção Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) Date: 2019-03-25 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Ana Paula Gomes; Ana Luiza G Soares; Ana M B Menezes; Maria Cecília Assunção; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Laura D Howe; Helen Gonçalves Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 2.106