BACKGROUND: Oral endocrine therapy (OET) such as tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors reduces recurrence and mortality for the 75% of breast cancer survivors (BCSs) with a diagnosis of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Because many BCSs decide not take OET as recommended because of adverse effects, understanding BCSs' decisional supports and needs is foundational to supporting quality OET decision making about whether to adhere to OET. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine literature pertaining to OET nonadherence and adverse effects using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework categories of decisional supports and decisional needs because these factors potentially influence OET use. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and CINAHL using combined search terms "aromatase inhibitors and adherence" and "tamoxifen and adherence." Studies that did not meet criteria were excluded. Relevant data from 25 publications were extracted into tables and reviewed by 2 authors. RESULTS: Findings identified the impact of adverse effects on OET nonadherence, an absence of decisional supports provided to or available for BCSs who are experiencing OET adverse effects, and the likelihood of unmet decisional needs related to OET. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse effects contribute to BCSs decisions to stop OET, yet there has been little investigation of the process through which that occurs. This review serves as a call to action for providers to provide support to BCSs experiencing OET adverse effects and facing decisions related to nonadherence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Findings suggest BCSs prescribed OET have unmet decisional needs, and more decisional supports are needed for BCSs experiencing OET adverse effects.
BACKGROUND: Oral endocrine therapy (OET) such as tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors reduces recurrence and mortality for the 75% of breast cancer survivors (BCSs) with a diagnosis of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Because many BCSs decide not take OET as recommended because of adverse effects, understanding BCSs' decisional supports and needs is foundational to supporting quality OET decision making about whether to adhere to OET. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine literature pertaining to OET nonadherence and adverse effects using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework categories of decisional supports and decisional needs because these factors potentially influence OET use. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and CINAHL using combined search terms "aromatase inhibitors and adherence" and "tamoxifen and adherence." Studies that did not meet criteria were excluded. Relevant data from 25 publications were extracted into tables and reviewed by 2 authors. RESULTS: Findings identified the impact of adverse effects on OET nonadherence, an absence of decisional supports provided to or available for BCSs who are experiencing OET adverse effects, and the likelihood of unmet decisional needs related to OET. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse effects contribute to BCSs decisions to stop OET, yet there has been little investigation of the process through which that occurs. This review serves as a call to action for providers to provide support to BCSs experiencing OET adverse effects and facing decisions related to nonadherence. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Findings suggest BCSs prescribed OET have unmet decisional needs, and more decisional supports are needed for BCSs experiencing OET adverse effects.
Authors: Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Robert P Hawkins; James W Dearing; Suzanne Pingree; Jana Bolduan Lomax; Helen McDowell; Erica Ferro Morse; BreAnne Barela Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: C Cluze; D Rey; L Huiart; M K BenDiane; A D Bouhnik; C Berenger; M P Carrieri; R Giorgi Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jun J Mao; Annie Chung; Adrian Benton; Shawndra Hill; Lyle Ungar; Charles E Leonard; Sean Hennessy; John H Holmes Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Aliza K Fink; Jerry Gurwitz; William Rakowski; Edward Guadagnoli; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kannie Chim; Sharon X Xie; Carrie T Stricker; Qing S Li; Robert Gross; John T Farrar; Angela DeMichele; Jun J Mao Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Alison Harrow; Ruth Dryden; Colin McCowan; Andrew Radley; Mark Parsons; Alastair M Thompson; Mary Wells Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Anna Kemp; David B Preen; Christobel Saunders; Frances Boyle; Max Bulsara; Eva Malacova; Elizabeth E Roughead Journal: Springerplus Date: 2014-06-04
Authors: Ekim Ekinci; Salima Nathoo; Thushara Korattyil; Aisha Vadhariya; Hanna A Zaghloul; Polly A Niravath; Susan M Abughosh; Meghana V Trivedi Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Maurice J Berkowitz; Carlie K Thompson; Laura T Zibecchi; Minna K Lee; Elani Streja; Jacob S Berkowitz; Cachet M Wenziger; Jennifer L Baker; Maggie L DiNome; Deanna J Attai Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 4.062