Literature DB >> 27532362

Fluoroquinolone-Resistant and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Infections in Patients with Pyelonephritis, United States(1).

David A Talan, Sukhjit S Takhar, Anusha Krishnadasan, Fredrick M Abrahamian, William R Mower, Gregory J Moran.   

Abstract

For 2013-2014, we prospectively identified US adults with flank pain, temperature >38.0°C, and a diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis, confirmed by culture. Cultures from 453 (86.9%) of 521 patients grew Escherichia coli. Among E. coli isolates from 272 patients with uncomplicated pyelonephritis and 181 with complicated pyelonephritis, prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance across study sites was 6.3% (range by site 0.0%-23.1%) and 19.9% (0.0%-50.0%), respectively; prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production was 2.6% (0.0%-8.3%) and 12.2% (0.0%-17.2%), respectively. Ten (34.5%) of 29 patients with ESBL infection reported no exposure to antimicrobial drugs, healthcare, or travel. Of the 29 patients with ESBL infection and 53 with fluoroquinolone-resistant infection, 22 (75.9%) and 24 (45.3%), respectively, were initially treated with in vitro inactive antimicrobial drugs. Prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance exceeds treatment guideline thresholds for alternative antimicrobial drug strategies, and community-acquired ESBL-producing E. coli infection has emerged in some US communities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTX-M-15; E. coli; ESBL; Enterobacteriaceae; Escherichia coli; United States; antimicrobial resistance; bacteria; complicated; extended-spectrum β-lactamase; fluoroquinolone; gram-negative bacteria; kidney disease; nephritis; prevalence; pyelonephritis; risk factors; uncomplicated

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27532362      PMCID: PMC4994338          DOI: 10.3201/eid2209.160148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Escherichia coli, the predominant cause of community-acquired urinary tract infection (UTI) worldwide, is increasingly resistant to available antimicrobial drugs. In the United States, in vitro resistance of E. coli to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) became prevalent in the 1990s (). Over the past decade, fluoroquinolone resistance rates have increased to >10% in some surveys (,). In many parts of the world, E. coli fluoroquinolone resistance rates are >20% among patients with community-acquired uncomplicated UTI and >50% among patients with complicated infections (). In addition, infections resulting from extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)–producing E. coli and other Enterobacteriaceae are becoming increasingly common in these same areas and are associated with sequence type (ST) 131, a globally disseminated, multidrug-resistant clone that frequently produces CTX-M-15 ESBL. These E. coli isolates are generally resistant to cephalosporins and often to other antimicrobial drug classes. In North America, ESBL-producing E. coli infections have occurred predominantly in patients with healthcare exposure and have not become prevalent as a cause of community-acquired infections (–). The 2010 international treatment guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) recommend for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis a fluoroquinolone and an initial dose of an agent from another antimicrobial drug class (e.g., ceftriaxone or gentamicin) if the fluoroquinolone resistance rate is >10% (). For uncomplicated cystitis, the guidelines discourage use of an antimicrobial drug if its resistance rate is >20%. The guidelines do not address a scenario in which ESBL-producing uropathogens have become prevalent among patients with community-acquired infections. Use of antimicrobial drugs for which the uropathogen shows in vitro resistance has been associated with substantially reduced response rates (,,), which can lead to serious consequences, particularly for patients with pyelonephritis. Given rapid changes in global resistance patterns and a lack of recent active and prospective surveillance of community-acquired UTI in the United States, the extent to which the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance has increased and multidrug-resistant ESBL-producing strains have emerged in the community is unknown. We sought to determine the prevalence of E. coli antimicrobial resistance among patients with acute pyelonephritis who sought care at a US emergency department (ED)–based sentinel research network. We focused on fluoroquinolone-resistant and ESBL-producing isolates from these patients and examined risk factors for antimicrobial drug resistance.

Methods

Participants

We recruited adults seeking care in EMERGEncy ID NET, a network of 10 university-affiliated urban US EDs (). All 10 study sites (Technical Appendix) provided institutional review board approval. We enrolled patients >18 years of age who sought care during July 2013–December 2014 and had flank pain or costovertebral tenderness; temperature >38.0°C (100.4°F) measured by any method (i.e., oral, rectal, or axillary); and a presumptive diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis (i.e., patient received treatment for this infection during ED visit or was prescribed treatment at discharge). All sites conducted an audit to compare characteristics of enrolled and nonenrolled eligible patients to estimate case-finding sensitivity and detect enrollment biases (online Technical Appendix).

Design and Measurements

We conducted a cross-sectional study by using a convenience sample of prospectively identified patients. ED physicians or study coordinators who used standardized forms at the time of care collected the following: demographic characteristics (i.e., age, sex, race, ethnicity); symptom duration; urinary tract abnormalities; UTI within the previous year; concurrent and immunocompromising conditions; antimicrobial drug use within the previous 2 and 60 days; a fluoroquinolone- or ceftriaxone-resistant UTI within the previous 90 days and 1 year; long-term care residence; hospitalization; travel outside North America within the previous 90 days; illness severity; disposition; and treatments provided. The study population consisted of patients with urine specimens that grew a single uropathogen at >104 CFU/mL. We defined a uropathogen as an organism known to be associated with UTI; among possible pathogens, we found E. coli, Klebsiella, Proteus, Pseudomonas, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, and Salmonella species; Staphylococcus aureus or S. saprophyticus; and Enterococcus and Aerococcus species. If a urine specimen grew >1 organism, we considered it to be contaminated and excluded it. We also excluded specimens that grew Lactobacillus, non-saprophyticus coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, or Corynebacteria species; or α- or γ-hemolytic streptococci. Patients’ urine specimens were collected in sterile containers by mid-stream clean-catch technique (91.4%), urethral catheterization (5.8%), and other techniques (e.g., sample from collection bag [2.7%] or suprapubic aspirate [0.2%]). Laboratories determined MICs by using automated susceptibility testing with VITEK commercial panels (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) at 7 sites; Microscan (Dade Behring, Inc., Sacramento, CA, USA) at 2 sites; and Phoenix Instrument System (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 1 site, according to manufacturer instructions. Each site used E. coli antimicrobial drug resistance breakpoints based on MIC breakpoints (µg/mL) of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (Wayne, PA, USA) as follows: ampicillin >32; TMP/SMX >4/76; cefazolin >8; ceftriaxone >4; cefotaxime >4; ciprofloxacin >4; levofloxacin >8; ertapenem >2; and imipenem >4 (). We report resistance rates for antimicrobial drugs included in the study site laboratories’ standard susceptibility testing panel. In 2010, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute changed breakpoints for cephalosporins, aztreonam, and carbapenems. We provided Etests (bioMérieux) for ceftriaxone and imipenem to sites that had not yet updated automated susceptibility testing systems to enable these sites to use the new breakpoints. We considered Enterobacteriaceae isolates that were nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone (i.e., MIC >1 µg/mL) to be potentially ESBL producing (). The sites shipped these isolates to a reference laboratory to confirm speciation, ESBL production, and molecular characterization (online Technical Appendix). We classified patients as having complicated pyelonephritis if they were pregnant or male or had a current or preexisting functional or anatomic urinary tract abnormality or current immunocompromising condition. Possible preexisting urinary tract abnormalities were history of kidney stones, genitourinary procedures within the past 30 days, prostatic pathology, bladder catheter within the past 30 days, neurogenic urinary retention, ureteral stricture, duplicated collecting system, renal or bladder cancer, renal transplant, ureteral diversion, vesico-ureteral reflux, single kidney, and nephrostomy tubes. Immunocompromising conditions were diabetes, active cancer, systemic corticosteroid use, current use of other immunosuppressants, chronic debilitating condition, chronic renal insufficiency or failure, and HIV infection. We identified current complicating features on the basis of clinical findings or laboratory studies in the ED; possible complications were pregnancy, diabetes, bladder catheter, ureteral stent, percutaneous nephrostomy tube, prostatitis, nephrolithiasis, renal or perirenal abscess, and urinary retention. We recorded history of chronic debilitating illness, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart or hepatic failure, but did not assign such illness as a criterion for complicated infection. We classified patients without criteria for complicated pyelonephritis as having uncomplicated pyelonephritis. We defined healthcare-associated infections as those in patients hospitalized or residing in a long-term care facility within the previous 90 days; other patients were classified as having community-acquired infections.

Statistical Analysis

To manage the study data, we used REDCap electronic-data capture tools hosted by the University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA (). We used SAS Version 9.3 (Cary, NC, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2013 (Redmond, WA, USA) to analyze data and used descriptive statistics to summarize patient characteristics and resistance prevalence. We calculated relative risks and 95% CIs to determine associations between epidemiologic and clinical characteristics and presence or absence of fluoroquinolone-resistant and ESBL-producing E. coli infections.

Results

Of 817 enrolled patients with acute pyelonephritis, 793 (97.1%) submitted a urine culture. Of those 793 patients, 272 (34.3%) were excluded from analysis: 149 (18.8%) had no culture growth; 74 (9.3%) grew >1 contaminant; 17 (2.1%) grew >1 isolate at <104 CFU/mL; 25 (3.2%) grew >1 organism at 104 CFU/mL; and 7 (0.9%) had no fever. The study population consisted of 521 patients who grew 1 uropathogen at >104 CFU/mL. The case finding audit revealed a 66% enrollment of eligible patients. Enrolled and nonenrolled patients were similar for most characteristics, including E. coli susceptibility rates to TMP/SMX, ceftriaxone, and fluoroquinolones (Technical Appendix). Among the 521 study patients, median age was 37 (range 18–88, interquartile range 26–52) years; 455 (87.3%) were female (Table 1). Most (446 [85.6%]) patients had a community-acquired infection; 74 (14.2%) had a healthcare-associated infection (70 with hospitalization and 9 with nursing home residence in the previous 90 days). A total of 286 (54.9%) patients had uncomplicated pyelonephritis; 235 (45.1%) had complicated pyelonephritis.
Table 1

Epidemiologic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of 521 US emergency department patients with acute uncomplicated and complicated pyelonephritis, July 2013–December 2014*


Value
Total patients, N = 521
Uncomplicated, n = 286
Complicated, n = 235
Age, median y (IQR; range)
37 (26–52; 18–88)
30 (23–41; 18–79)
50 (36–58; 19–88)
Symptom duration, median d (IQR; range)
3.0 (2–5; 0–30)
3.0 (2–5; 0–30)
3.0 (2–5; 0–30)
Initial ED temperature, °C (IQR; range)
38.9 (38.4–39.4; 38.0–43.0)
38.9 (38.4–39.4; 38.0–40.3)
39.0 (38.4–39.4; 38.0–43.0)
Sex
F455 (87.3)286 (100.0)169 (71.9)
M
66 (12.7)
0 (0)
66 (28.1)
Race/ethnicity
White/Hispanic372 (71.4)191 (66.8)181 (77.0)
Black119 (22.8)76 (26.6)43 (18.3)
Asian/Pacific Islander22 (4.2)15 (5.2)7 (3.0)
Other18 (3.5)11 (3.9)7 (3.0)
Unknown
5 (1.0)
3 (1.0)
2 (0.9)
Hispanic ethnicity
Yes281 (53.9)155 (54.2)126 (53.6)
No233 (44.7)126 (44.1)107 (45.5)
Unknown
7 (1.3)
5 (1.7)
2 (0.9)
Antimicrobial drugs taken
Within past 60 d125 (24.0)49 (17.1)76 (32.3)
Within past 2 d
36 (6.9)
15 (5.2)
21 (8.9)
Healthcare-associated illness†
74 (14.2)
18 (6.3)
56 (23.8)
Complicating feature
Concurrent condition131 (25.1)0 (0)131 (55.7)
History of UTA116 (22.3)0 (0)116 (49.4)
Current feature
61 (11.7)
0 (0)
61 (26.0)
UTIs within past year‡
0334 (64.5)196 (68.8)138 (59.2)
186 (16.6)46 (16.1)40 (17.2)
2428 (8.1)23 (8.1)19 (8.2)
≥3
56 (10.8)
20 (7.0)
36 (15.5)
Travel outside North America within past 90 d§
17/520 (3.3)
8/286 (2.8)
9/234 (3.8)
Prior UTI caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli
Within past year16 (3.1)4 (1.4)12 (5.1)
Within past 90 d
14 (2.7)
2 (0.7)
12 (5.1)
Prior UTI caused by ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli
Within past year9 (1.7)2 (0.7)7 (3.0)
Within past 90 d
6 (1.2)
1 (0.3)
5 (2.1)
Severity of Illness¶
Mild66 (12.7)34 (11.9)32 (13.6)
Moderate267 (51.2)156 (54.5)111 (47.2)
Severe
188 (36.1)
96 (33.6)
92 (39.1)
Disposition
Ward240 (46.1)100 (35.0)140 (59.6)
MCA40 (7.7)13 (4.5)27 (11.5)
Home239 (45.9)172 (60.1)67 (28.5)
AMA2 (0.4)1 (0.3)1 (0.4)

*Values are given as no. (%) except as indicated. AMA, left against medical advice; E. coli , Escherichia coli; ED, emergency department; IQR, interquartile range; MCA, monitored care admission; UTA, urinary tract abnormality; UTI, urinary tract infection.. 
†Hospitalized or residing in a long-term care facility within past 90 days.
‡Percentages were calculated with UTI information available for 518 patients, 285 of whom had uncomplicated cases and 233 had complicated cases. 
§Percentages were calculated with information available for 520 patients, 286 of whom had uncomplicated cases and 234 had complicated cases.
¶Mild indicates illness that does not affect patient’s normal activities; moderate partially affects normal activities but does not confine patient to house or bed; severe affects activities considerably, such as confining patient to house or bed.

*Values are given as no. (%) except as indicated. AMA, left against medical advice; E. coli , Escherichia coli; ED, emergency department; IQR, interquartile range; MCA, monitored care admission; UTA, urinary tract abnormality; UTI, urinary tract infection.. 
†Hospitalized or residing in a long-term care facility within past 90 days.
‡Percentages were calculated with UTI information available for 518 patients, 285 of whom had uncomplicated cases and 233 had complicated cases. 
§Percentages were calculated with information available for 520 patients, 286 of whom had uncomplicated cases and 234 had complicated cases.
¶Mild indicates illness that does not affect patient’s normal activities; moderate partially affects normal activities but does not confine patient to house or bed; severe affects activities considerably, such as confining patient to house or bed. Of types of uropathogens in patients with uncomplicated and complicated pyelonephritis (Table 2), E. coli accounted for infections in 453 (86.9%) patients; 272 (60.0%) of the infections were uncomplicated, and 181 (40.0%) were complicated. Among the 286 patients with uncomplicated infections, E. coli accounted for 95.1%; among the 235 patients with complicated infections, E. coli accounted for 77.0% (Table 2).
Table 2

Uropathogens identified among US emergency department patients with acute uncomplicated and complicated pyelonephritis, July 2013–December 2014

UropathogenNo. (%)
Total, N = 521Uncomplicated cases, n = 286Complicated cases, n = 235
Escherichia coli 453 (86.9)272 (95.1)181 (77.0)
Staphylococcus saprophyticus 2 (0.4)2 (0.7)0 (0)
Staphylococcus aureus 4 (0.8)0 (0)4 (1.7)
Proteus sp.4 (0.8)3 (1.0)1 (0.4)
Enterobacter sp.5 (1.0)1 (0.3)4 (1.7)
Klebsiella pneumoniae 25 (4.8)4 (1.4)21 (8.9)
Enterococcus sp.12 (2.3)0 (0)12 (5.1)
Pseudomonas sp.7 (1.3)0 (0)7 (3.0)
Group B streptococcus2 (0.4)1 (0.3)1 (0.4)
Other*5 (1.0)2 (0.7)3 (1.3)

*Other pathogens were 2 Aerococcus urinae, 2 Citrobacter koseri, and 1 Salmonella species.

*Other pathogens were 2 Aerococcus urinae, 2 Citrobacter koseri, and 1 Salmonella species. E. coli antimicrobial drug resistance rates among patients with complicated pyelonephritis tended to be higher than rates for patients with uncomplicated cases, except for TMP/SMX (Table 3). Among all patients, E. coli resistance rates varied by drug: ampicillin, 57.2% (259/453); TMP/SMX, 36.4% (165/453); gentamicin, 9.9% (43/436); cefazolin, 14.2% (52/367); ceftriaxone, 7.7% (35/453); levofloxacin, 10.2% (33/325); and ciprofloxacin, 12.1% (48/397). Among 53 fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates, 8 (15.1%) were susceptible to ampicillin, 34 (64.2%) to gentamicin, and 27 (50.9%) to ceftriaxone. Of 46 isolates tested for susceptibility to cefazolin, 19 (41.3%) were susceptible; all 48 (100%) isolates tested were susceptible to a carbapenem. E. coli antimicrobial drug resistance rates for patients with uncomplicated and complicated pyelonephritis varied by study site (Technical Appendix Tables 2, 3).
Table 3

Antimicrobial drug resistance rates for Escherichia coli isolates from US emergency department patients with acute uncomplicated and complicated pyelonephritis, July 2013–December 2014*

Antimicrobial drugPatients with antimicrobial drug–resistant isolates, no./no. tested (%)
Total, N = 453Uncomplicated cases, N = 272Complicated cases, N = 181
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole165/453 (36.4)111/272 (40.8)54/181 (29.8)
Ampicillin259/453 (57.2)152/272 (55.9)107/181 (59.1)
Cefazolin52/367 (14.2)18/219 (8.2)34/148 (23.0)
Ceftriaxone35/453 (7.7)7/272 (2.6)28/181 (15.5)
Ciprofloxacin48/397 (12.1)15/237 (6.3)33/160 (20.6)
Levofloxacin33/325 (10.2)10/195 (5.1)23/130 (17.7)
Gentamicin43/436 (9.9)19/261 (7.3)24/175 (13.7)
Imipenem0/135 (0)0/90 (0)0/45 (0)
Ertapenem0/201 (0)0/111 (0)0/90 (0)
Meropenem0/161 (0)0/96 (0)0/65 (0)
Doripenem0/139 (0)0/74 (0)0/65 (0)

*Denominators indicate number of isolates tested against a specific antimicrobial drug; the composition of testing panels varied by site.

*Denominators indicate number of isolates tested against a specific antimicrobial drug; the composition of testing panels varied by site. Among patients with uncomplicated pyelonephritis, 17 (6.3%) of 272 E. coli isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolone. The range of prevalence by site was 0.0%–23.1%; for 2 sites, prevalence was >10% (Figure 1; Technical Appendix Tables 2, 3). Among patients with complicated pyelonephritis, 36 (19.9%) of 181 E. coli isolates showed fluoroquinolone resistance. The range of prevalence by site was 0.0%–50.0%; 8 sites had a prevalence >10%, 4 of which had a prevalence >20%. We found fluoroquinolone resistance associated with complicated E. coli infection, prior use of antimicrobial drugs and fluoroquinolone, hospital admission, and prior UTI resulting from a fluoroquinolone- or ceftriaxone-resistant organism (Table 4).
Figure 1

Prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli infection among emergency department patients with uncomplicated (U) and complicated (C) pyelonephritis by study site, United States, July 2013–December 2014. Study sites are listed in the Technical Appendix; Technical Appendix Tables 2 and 3 provide additional results on antimicrobial resistance rates. In vitro resistance to ciprofloxacin and/or levofloxacin is shown as % (no. of patients with a resistant isolate/total no. of patients tested)

Table 4

Factors associated with fluoroquinolone resistance among 453 US emergency department patients with pyelonephritis caused by Escherichia coli, July 2013–December 2014*

FactorFluoroquinolone-resistance rate
Relative risk (95% CI)
Factor present, no./total (%)Factor absent, no./total (%)
Complicated infection
36/181 (19.9)
17/272 (6.3)
3.2 (1.8–5.8)
Prior antimicrobial drugs taken
Within past 60 d24/94 (25.5)29/359 (8.1)3.2 (1.9–5.3)
Within past 2 d
9/27 (33.3)
44/426 (10.3)
3.2 (1.6–5.8)
Prior fluoroquinolone use
Within past 60 d12/19 (63.2)41/434 (9.4)6.7 (3.8–9.6)
Within past 2 d
6/8 (75.0)
47/445 (10.6)
7.1 (3.2–9.4)
IV antimicrobial drugs within past 30 d6/26 (23.1)47/425 (11.1)2.1 (0.8–4.3)
LTC within past 90 d1/3 (33.3)52/450 (11.6)2.9 (0.2–7.8)
Admitted to hospital within 90 d11/42 (26.2)42/411 (10.2)2.6 (1.3–4.6)
Travel outside United States within past 90 d
5/17 (29.4)†
48/436 (11.0)
2.7 (1.0–5.5)
UTI resulting from fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli
Within past year7/9 (77.8)46/444 (10.4)7.5 (3.7–9.6)
Within past 90 d
7/8 (87.5)
46/445 (10.3)
8.5 (4.3–9.8)
UTI resulting from ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli
Within past year5/6 (83.3)48/447 (10.7)7.8 (3.3–9.4)
Within past 90 d5/5 (100.0)48/448 (10.7)9.3 (4.1–9.3)

*Denominators differ because factors have a different distribution among the patient population. IV, intravenous; LTC, residence in a long-term care facility; UTI, urinary tract infection. 
†Of the 5 patients that traveled outside the United States, 3 traveled to Mexico or Central America and 2 traveled to Asia.

Prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli infection among emergency department patients with uncomplicated (U) and complicated (C) pyelonephritis by study site, United States, July 2013–December 2014. Study sites are listed in the Technical Appendix; Technical Appendix Tables 2 and 3 provide additional results on antimicrobial resistance rates. In vitro resistance to ciprofloxacin and/or levofloxacin is shown as % (no. of patients with a resistant isolate/total no. of patients tested) *Denominators differ because factors have a different distribution among the patient population. IV, intravenous; LTC, residence in a long-term care facility; UTI, urinary tract infection. 
†Of the 5 patients that traveled outside the United States, 3 traveled to Mexico or Central America and 2 traveled to Asia. Among patients with uncomplicated pyelonephritis, ESBL production was found in 7 (2.6%) of 272 E. coli isolates; range by study site was 0.0%–8.3% (Figure 2; Technical Appendix Tables 2, 3). Among patients with complicated pyelonephritis, ESBL production was found in 22 (12.2%) of 181 E. coli isolates; range by site was 0.0%–17.2% (Figure 2; Technical Appendix Tables 2, 3). Frequencies of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were higher among patients with antimicrobial drug resistance risk fac-tors than among those without these factors (Table 5). Nineteen (65.5%) of 29 patients with ESBL-producing E. coli infection had a recognized risk factor for antimicrobial drug resistance (Figure 2; Technical Appendix Tables 2, 3). Sixteen (55.2%) had antimicrobial drug exposure within the previous 60 days. During the previous 90 days, 6 (20.7%) had healthcare-setting exposure and 4 (13.8%) had travel outside North America. We found ESBL-producing E. coli infection associated with complicated infection, prior antimicrobial drug use, travel outside North America, and prior UTI resulting from a fluoroquinolone- or ceftriaxone-resistant organism. Among 37 isolates that grew other Enterobacteriaceae, including Klebsiella pneumoniae, 1 (2.7%) was ESBL producing. Among 29 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, susceptibility rates to other antimicrobial drugs were 41.4% to TMP/SMX, 18.5% to ciprofloxacin, 21.7% to levofloxacin, 41.4% to gentamicin, and 100% to carbapenem. The prevalence of E. coli fluoroquinolone resistance correlated with the prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli by site (Figure 3).
Figure 2

Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli infection among patients with uncomplicated (U) and complicated (C) pyelonephritis, by study site, United States, July 2013–December 2014. Study sites are listed in the Technical Appendix; Technical Appendix Tables 2 and 3 provide additional results on antimicrobial resistance rates.

Table 5

Factors associated with ESBL production among 453 US emergency department patients with pyelonephritis caused by Escherichia coli, July 2013–December 2014*

FactorESBL-producing E. coli rate
Relative risk (95% CI)
Factor present, no./total (%)Factor absent, no./total (%)
Age >65 y4/22 (18.2)25/431 (5.8)3.1 (0.96–8.1)
Complicated infection
22/181 (12.2)
7/272 (2.6)
4.7 (2.0–12.0)
Prior antimicrobial drugs
Within past 60 d16/94 (17.0)13/359 (3.6)4.7 (2.2–10.0)
Within past 2 d
4/27 (14.8)
25/426 (5.9)
2.5 (0.8–6.7)
IV antimicrobial drugs taken within past 30 d4/26 (15.4)25/425 (5.9)2.6 (0.8–6.9)
LTC within past 90 d1/3 (33.3)28/450 (6.2)5.4 (0.3–14.9)
Hospital admittance within past 90 d5/42 (11.9)24/411 (5.8)2.0 (0.7–5.2)
Travel outside United States within past 90 d
4/17 (23.5)†
25/436 (5.7)
4.1 (1.3–10.1)
UTI caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli
Within past year5/9 (55.6)24/444 (5.4)10.3 (3.8–17.5)
Within past 90 d
5/8 (62.5)
24/445 (5.4)
11.6 (4.4–18.3)
UTI caused by ceftriaxone-resistant E. coli
Within past year5/6 (83.3)24/447 (5.4)15.5 (6.2 −19.2)
Within past 90 d
5/5 (100.0)
24/448 (5.4)
18.7 (8.0–18.7)
Fluoroquinolone resistance24/53 (45.3)5/400 (1.3)36.2 (14.2–104.7)

*Denominators differ because factors have a different distribution among the patient population. ESBL, extended spectrum β-lactamase; IV, intravenous; LTC, residence in a long-term care facility; UTI, urinary tract infection. 
†Of these 4 patients who traveled to other regions, 3 traveled to Mexico or Central America and 1 traveled to Asia.

Figure 3

Prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant and ESBL-producing Escherichia coli infections among patients with uncomplicated and complicated pyelonephritis, by study site, United States, July 2013–December 2014. Each dot indicates a study site; the line to show the general trend between fluoroquinolone resistance and ESBL-producing E. coli was generated by using simple linear regression. ESBL, extended spectrum β-lactamase.

Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli infection among patients with uncomplicated (U) and complicated (C) pyelonephritis, by study site, United States, July 2013–December 2014. Study sites are listed in the Technical Appendix; Technical Appendix Tables 2 and 3 provide additional results on antimicrobial resistance rates. *Denominators differ because factors have a different distribution among the patient population. ESBL, extended spectrum β-lactamase; IV, intravenous; LTC, residence in a long-term care facility; UTI, urinary tract infection. 
†Of these 4 patients who traveled to other regions, 3 traveled to Mexico or Central America and 1 traveled to Asia. Prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant and ESBL-producing Escherichia coli infections among patients with uncomplicated and complicated pyelonephritis, by study site, United States, July 2013–December 2014. Each dot indicates a study site; the line to show the general trend between fluoroquinolone resistance and ESBL-producing E. coli was generated by using simple linear regression. ESBL, extended spectrum β-lactamase. We further characterized 26 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates and 1 K. pneumoniae isolate. Among E. coli isolates, PCR identified multiple ESBL types: 22 (84.6%) produced CTX-M-15 (16 [61.5%] produced only CTX-M-15; 6 [23.1%] produced CTX-M-15 and TEM-1); 2 (7.7%) produced CTX-M-27; 1 (3.8%) produced CTX-M-14; and 1 (3.8%) produced CTX-M-14 and TEM-1. The K. pneumoniae isolate produced SHV-1 and CTX-M-15 ESBL types. Sixteen (61.5%) of the E. coli isolates were clonal type O25b-ST131. Among patients with an E. coli infection, 223 (49.2%) were discharged from the ED and 229 (50.6%) were admitted to the hospital; of these, 13 (5.8%) and 18 (7.9%), respectively, were treated with an antimicrobial drug that lacked in vitro activity against their infection. Of 53 patients with a fluoroquinolone-resistant and 29 with an ESBL-producing infection, 24 (45.3%) and 22 (75.0%), respectively, were initially treated with in vitro–inactive antimicrobial drugs. Among 29 patients with an ESBL infection, 9 (31.0%) were discharged from the ED; an in vitro–inactive antimicrobial drug was initially prescribed to 7 (77.8%). Among 20 (69.0%) hospitalized patients with an ESBL infection, 15 (75.0%) were initially given an in vitro–inactive antimicrobial drug; 1 of those 15 patients was given gentamicin, 13 were given cephalosporin, and 1 was given both.

Discussion

For 2013–2014, we found that prevalence of E. coli fluoroquinolone resistance was >10% for patients with uncomplicated pyelonephritis at 2 of 10 sites and >20% for patients with complicated infections at 4 of 10 sentinel sites surveyed in the United States. E. coli fluoroquinolone resistance was particularly prevalent in groups with antimicrobial drug resistance risk. These rates exceed thresholds for the 2010 IDSA treatment guidelines, which recommend consideration of an additional antimicrobial drug of a different class and other agents (). Data from a similar study we conducted during 2000–2004 () indicate that, among all healthcare-seeking ED patients with acute pyelonephritis, the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli increased from 3.9% during 2000–2004 to 11.7% during 2013–2014. During 2000–2004, we found no infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria. As in other parts of the world, ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae are emerging among patients with community-acquired UTI in the United States. For patients with uncomplicated and complicated pyelonephritis caused by E. coli, we found that 2.6% and 12.2%, respectively, had infection caused by an ESBL-producing organism; rates were even higher for patients with risk factors. The globally disseminated, multidrug-resistant clone ST131, which produces CTX-M-15 β-lactamase, accounted for 85.2% of these infections. Of ESBL-infected patients, about one third lacked traditional antimicrobial resistance risk factors (i.e., antimicrobial drug or healthcare-setting exposure or international travel), suggesting that these isolates are now endemic in some US communities. Among ESBL-infected patients, about three quarters were initially treated with an antimicrobial drug lacking in vitro activity, including the sickest patients who required hospitalization. We did not collect outcome data, but lack of in vitro activity of the antimicrobial drug used for treatment has been associated with relatively poor response rates among patients with pyelonephritis (,,). Previous surveys have suggested that E. coli fluoroquinolone resistance rates are increasing in the United States. Among outpatients seeking care at 30 US centers during 2003–2004, 59 (6.8%) of 862 E. coli isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin (). Another analysis of >12 million urine specimens from US outpatient centers found that the E. coli fluoroquinolone resistance rate increased from 3.0% in 2000 to 17.1% in 2010 (). Such laboratory-based resistance surveillance data may exaggerate the prevalence of resistance because patients for whom cultures are performed would be expected to have received prior therapy and to have had healthcare exposure more frequently than patients without cultures. Isolate-driven studies require retrospective review of records, which have missing and inaccurate data; also, uncertainty may exist regarding whether a specimen is from a patient with an actual clinical infection, rather than being a colonized or contaminated specimen. In routine practice, providers typically estimate local resistance rates on the basis of an antibiogram published by the local hospital laboratory. Resistance rates determined from antibiograms are prone to bias and indicate only whether the specimen was obtained from an outpatient or inpatient location. In contrast, we conducted syndromic surveillance of patients who sought care at a geographically diverse network of US EDs. We studied acute pyelonephritis because it is a distinct clinical syndrome for which cultures are routinely obtained and because isolates grown are less likely to be contaminants or colonizers, compared with those from patients with suspected cystitis. Historical data were obtained by real-time patient interviews, enabling accurate classification of complicated and uncomplicated pyelonephritis and ascertainment of antimicrobial drug resistance risk factors. To identify biases, we compared characteristics of enrolled and nonenrolled qualifying patients and found their characteristics to be similar, suggesting the validity of our sampling. Consequently, our data and that of other studies indicate that, in some parts of the United States, the rate of E. coli fluoroquinolone resistance among uropathogens is >10% among patients with uncomplicated pyelonephritis and >20% among those with complicated infections. However, variability exists; among patients with uncomplicated pyelonephritis, 3 of 10 sites had fluoroquinolone resistance rates <5%. Consistent with findings of previous investigations, we found E. coli fluoroquinolone resistance associated with complicated infection, prior use of antimicrobial drugs and fluoroquinolone, hospitalization, and prior UTI caused by a fluoroquinolone- or ceftriaxone-resistant organism (,). By using active, prospective surveillance, we found that ESBL-producing E. coli infections have now emerged to a considerable degree among patients with clinically confirmed community-acquired infections in parts of the United States, including among persons lacking commonly recognized antimicrobial drug resistance risk factors. This new observation is not unexpected, given the reported epidemiology of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections in communities outside North America. CTX-M enzymes are currently the most prevalent ESBL types worldwide. The ST131 clone is largely responsible for the international epidemic caused by CTX-M-15–producing E. coli, including infections seen in the United States (,,). A few US laboratory-based surveillance studies have reported community-acquired ESBL infections. Peirano et al. () described ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from 30 community-dwelling patients at 5 Chicago-area hospitals during 2008. These ESBL-producing strains represented 2%–8% of E. coli isolates at each hospital. Khawcharoenporn et al. () reported that ≈5% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates from ED patients with presumed UTI during 2008–2009 were ESBL-producing, although specific risk data were not provided. Doi et al. () reviewed records of patients with cultures that grew ESBL-producing E. coli isolates at 1 hospital in each of 5 US cities during 2009–2010. Among 13,270 E. coli isolates, 523 (3.9%) were ESBL producing. Of the 291 patients infected or colonized with ESBL-producing E. coli as outpatients, infections of 107 (36.8%) were thought to be community associated. Community ESBL-producing E. coli isolates were resistant to multiple agents: 87.5% to ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin and 39.4% to gentamicin. All isolates from that study were susceptible to a carbapenem; we also found that all ESBL-producing isolates in our investigation were susceptible to a carbapenem. Studies from outside North America have identified several characteristics associated with ESBL infection, such as recurrent and complicated UTI; advanced age; recent hospitalization; use of a β-lactam or fluoroquinolone; travel to Asia, Middle East, or Africa; and fresh water swimming (,–). Banerjee et al. () conducted a case–control study among adults with E. coli clinical isolates cultured in the Chicago area and found that ESBL infection was associated with travel to India, ciprofloxacin use, and age. We found ESBL-producing E. coli infection associated with complicated infection, prior antimicrobial drug use, travel outside North America, and prior UTI resulting from fluoroquinolone- or ceftriaxone-resistant infection. The importance of investigating past susceptibility data when considering empirical treatment is highlighted by our observation that both fluoroquinolone resistance and ESBL-production were associated with previous resistant infections. Our study has limitations. We were unsuccessful in enrolling all consecutive patients, which may have introduced bias in our selection of patients. However, our audit of eligible case-patients showed similarity of enrolled and nonenrolled patients, including their E. coli antimicrobial drug susceptibility rates; furthermore, most (>97%) enrolled patients had urine cultures collected, reducing potential bias. The prevalence of ESBL-producing strains may have been underestimated because we did not use ESBL-selective media and used only ceftriaxone instead of several advanced-generation cephalosporins to screen for presence of ESBL-producing strains. However, this method enabled us to have greater site participation; furthermore, screening isolates with a ceftriaxone MIC >1 µg/mL has been reported to have a sensitivity >98% on the basis of phenotypic testing (). In addition, some patients may not have had pyelonephritis if a contaminated specimen was misinterpreted as noncontaminated, although >97% of patients had urine collected by a technique that minimizes contamination (i.e., clean catch, urethral catheterization, or suprapubic aspiration), and the diagnosis of pyelonephritis was further supported by clinical assessment. Our definition of confirmed infection as growth of 1 uropathogen at >104 CFU/mL may have missed some cases of pyelonephritis, although only ≈5% grew a single uropathogen at <104 CFU/mL or grew >1 uropathogen at >104 CFU/mL. Our hospitals were large US urban centers and may not represent patients in other settings, emphasizing the importance of local surveillance. IDSA treatment guidelines for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis recommend that, if the fluoroquinolone-resistance rate is >10%, then in addition to a fluoroquinolone, an agent of another class (i.e., ceftriaxone or gentamicin) should be administered (). Our findings indicate that fluoroquinolone resistance rates for E. coli are approaching or exceed this threshold for patients with uncomplicated pyelonephritis in many parts of the United States. For uncomplicated cystitis, the guidelines recommend alternative agents if the resistance rate is >20%, which is the current situation for fluoroquinolones in many settings for patients with complicated pyelonephritis. Unfortunately, we found that only one half to two thirds of fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone or gentamicin. Rates of fluoroquinolone-resistant and ESBL-producing E. coli infections correlate to geographic location. Prior exposure to antimicrobial drugs or a healthcare setting, travel outside the United States, and a history of an antimicrobial drug–resistant infection substantially increases the chance that a person will have a current fluoroquinolone-resistant or ESBL-producing E. coli infection. Therefore, in settings with high fluoroquinolone resistance rates, in settings where ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections have emerged, or among persons with antimicrobial drug resistance risk factors (especially patients with or at risk for severe sepsis), healthcare providers should consider empirical treatment with a carbapenem or another agent found to be consistently active on the basis of the local antibiogram. In this study, ≈50% of patients with pyelonephritis were managed as outpatients. Currently, no oral antimicrobial drugs with consistent in vitro activity are available for empirical treatment of pyelonephritis caused by ESBL-producing E. coli uropathogens. Our findings, including the variability in the prevalence of resistance by site, show that increased local efforts to enhance surveillance for antimicrobial drug resistance are necessary to best inform treatment decisions. Furthermore, availability of new antimicrobial drugs must be expedited.

Technical Appendix

Study methods and materials and tables comparing enrolled and nonenrolled patients and Escherichia coli antimicrobial drug resistance rates for patients with pyelonephritis by study sites.
  23 in total

1.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 2.  International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Kalpana Gupta; Thomas M Hooton; Kurt G Naber; Björn Wullt; Richard Colgan; Loren G Miller; Gregory J Moran; Lindsay E Nicolle; Raul Raz; Anthony J Schaeffer; David E Soper
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Comparison of ciprofloxacin (7 days) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (14 days) for acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis pyelonephritis in women: a randomized trial.

Authors:  D A Talan; W E Stamm; T M Hooton; G J Moran; T Burke; A Iravani; J Reuning-Scherer; D A Church
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 Mar 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli outpatient urinary isolates: final results from the North American Urinary Tract Infection Collaborative Alliance (NAUTICA).

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Tamiko L Hisanaga; Nancy M Laing; Melanie R DeCorby; Kim A Nichol; Barb Weshnoweski; Jack Johnson; Ayman Noreddin; Don E Low; James A Karlowsky; Daryl J Hoban
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Community-associated extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli infection in the United States.

Authors:  Yohei Doi; Yoon Soo Park; Jesabel I Rivera; Jennifer M Adams-Haduch; Ameet Hingwe; Emilia M Sordillo; James S Lewis; Wanita J Howard; Laura E Johnson; Bruce Polsky; James H Jorgensen; Sandra S Richter; Kathleen A Shutt; David L Paterson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  EMERGEncy ID NET: an emergency department-based emerging infections sentinel network. The EMERGEncy ID NET Study Group.

Authors:  D A Talan; G J Moran; W R Mower; M Newdow; S Ong; L Slutsker; W R Jarvis; L A Conn; R W Pinner
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Epidemiology and risk factors for isolation of Escherichia coli producing CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamase in a large U.S. Medical Center.

Authors:  Kayoko Hayakawa; Sureka Gattu; Dror Marchaim; Ashish Bhargava; Mohan Palla; Khaled Alshabani; Uma Mahesh Gudur; Harish Pulluru; Pradeep Bathina; Pranathi Rao Sundaragiri; Moumita Sarkar; Hari Kakarlapudi; Balaji Ramasamy; Priyanka Nanjireddy; Shah Mohin; Meenakshi Dasagi; Satya Datla; Vamsi Kuchipudi; Swetha Reddy; Shobha Shahani; Vijaya Upputuri; Satya Marrey; Vedavyas Gannamani; Nandhini Madhanagopal; Srinadh Annangi; Busani Sudha; Kalyan Srinivas Muppavarapu; Judy A Moshos; Paul R Lephart; Jason M Pogue; Karen Bush; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Impact of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase on acute pyelonephritis treated with empirical ceftriaxone.

Authors:  Shinwon Lee; Do Young Song; Seung Hyun Cho; Ki Tae Kwon
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.431

9.  Risk factors for community-acquired urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae--a case-control study in a low prevalence country.

Authors:  Arne Søraas; Arnfinn Sundsfjord; Irene Sandven; Cathrine Brunborg; Pål A Jenum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Urinary Tract Infections due to Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a Chicago Emergency Department.

Authors:  Thana Khawcharoenporn; Shawn Vasoo; Kamaljit Singh
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 1.112

View more
  30 in total

1.  The Pandemic H30 Subclone of Sequence Type 131 (ST131) as the Leading Cause of Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Infections in the United States (2011-2012).

Authors:  James R Johnson; Stephen Porter; Paul Thuras; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.835

Review 2.  Travel and the Spread of Drug-Resistant Bacteria.

Authors:  Kevin L Schwartz; Shaun K Morris
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.725

3.  Large Fecal Reservoir of Escherichia coli Sequence Type 131-H30 Subclone Strains That Are Shared Within Households and Resemble Clinical ST131-H30 Isolates.

Authors:  Muhanad Mohamed; Connie Clabots; Stephen B Porter; Tricia Bender; Paul Thuras; James R Johnson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  All-electrical monitoring of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Yichao Yang; Kalpana Gupta; Kamil L Ekinci
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mass Spectrometry-Based Detection of Beta Lactam Hydrolysis Enables Rapid Detection of Beta Lactamase Mediated Antibiotic Resistance.

Authors:  Raymond T Suhandynata; Kyle Lund; Andrés M Caraballo-Rodríguez; Sharon L Reed; Pieter C Dorrestein; Robert L Fitzgerald; Nicholas J Bevins
Journal:  Lab Med       Date:  2022-03-07

6.  Clinical and microbiological determinants of severe and fatal outcomes in patients infected with Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase.

Authors:  L Surgers; A Boyd; P-Y Boelle; V Lalande; P-A Jolivot; P-M Girard; G Arlet; C Cambier; A Homor; D Decre; J-L Meynard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Developmental loss, but not pharmacological suppression, of renal carbonic anhydrase 2 results in pyelonephritis susceptibility.

Authors:  John Ketz; Vijay Saxena; Samuel Arregui; Ashley Jackson; George J Schwartz; Takafumi Yagisawa; Robert L Fairchild; David S Hains; Andrew L Schwaderer
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2020-05-11

Review 8.  Advances in novel antibiotics to treat multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections.

Authors:  Aaron Matlock; Joshua Allan Garcia; Kayvan Moussavi; Brit Long; Stephen Yuan-Tung Liang
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.472

Review 9.  EMERGEncy ID NET: Review of a 20-Year Multisite Emergency Department Emerging Infections Research Network.

Authors:  Scott Santibanez; Leah S Fischer; Anusha Krishnadasan; Bethany Sederdahl; Toby Merlin; Gregory J Moran; David A Talan
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 4.423

10.  Urine Cultures in Acute Pyelonephritis: Knowing What You Are Up Against.

Authors:  Stephen Y Liang; Michael J Durkin
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.