Literature DB >> 27531652

The implantation effect: delay in seizure occurrence with implantation of intracranial electrodes.

M A Lane1, C A Kahlenberg1, Z Li2, K Kulandaival3, K L Secore1, V M Thadani1, K A Bujarski1, E J Kobylarz1, D W Roberts4, T D Tosteson5, B C Jobst1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A transient decrease in seizure frequency has been identified during therapeutic brain stimulation trials with stimulator in patients in the inactive sham group. This study was performed to examine whether the implantation of intracranial electrodes decreases seizure occurrence and explores factors that may be associated.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 193 patients was performed, all evaluated with both scalp video EEG monitoring and intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring. Data about the number of seizures per day during the monitoring period, the number of days until the first seizure, anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), pain medications, types of implanted electrodes, and anesthetic agents were reviewed. We conducted a repeated measure analysis for counted data using generalized estimating equations with a log-link function and adjustment for number of days and anti-epileptic medication load on the previous day to compare seizure frequencies between scalp and iEEG monitoring.
RESULTS: The time to the first seizure was significantly prolonged during iEEG monitoring as compared to scalp monitoring after correction for AED withdrawal (hazard ratio: 0.81, CI 0.69-0.96). During scalp video EEG monitoring, patients experienced an average of 1.09 seizures/day vs 1.27 seizures/day during iEEG monitoring (P=.066). There was no significant difference in seizure frequency in patients that received craniotomy vs burr holes only for intracranial implantation. An increasing number of electrodes implanted increased the delay to seizures (P=.01). Of all anesthetic agents used, desflurane seemed to have an anticonvulsive effect compared to other anesthetics (P=.006). Pain medication did not influence delay to seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: Seizures are delayed during iEEG as opposed to scalp monitoring illustrating the "implantation effect" previously observed. Surgical planning should account for longer monitoring periods, particularly when using larger intracranial arrays.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; epilepsy; neuropharmacology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27531652     DOI: 10.1111/ane.12662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6314            Impact factor:   3.209


  3 in total

1.  Chronic ambulatory electrocorticography from human speech cortex.

Authors:  Vikram R Rao; Matthew K Leonard; Jonathan K Kleen; Ben A Lucas; Emily A Mirro; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Seizure localization by chronic ambulatory electrocorticography.

Authors:  Alvin Y Chan; Robert C Knowlton; Edward F Chang; Vikram R Rao
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2018-04-21

3.  More Is More: Potential Benefits of Characterizing High-Frequency Activity Over Long Durations.

Authors:  Shyam Kumar Sudhakar; Omar J Ahmed
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 7.500

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.