Literature DB >> 27531600

Evolutionary response when selection and genetic variation covary across environments.

Corlett W Wood1, Edmund D Brodie2.   

Abstract

Although models of evolution usually assume that the strength of selection on a trait and the expression of genetic variation in that trait are independent, whenever the same ecological factor impacts both parameters, a correlation between the two may arise that accelerates trait evolution in some environments and slows it in others. Here, we address the evolutionary consequences and ecological causes of a correlation between selection and expressed genetic variation. Using a simple analytical model, we show that the correlation has a modest effect on the mean evolutionary response and a large effect on its variance, increasing among-population or among-generation variation in the response when positive, and diminishing variation when negative. We performed a literature review to identify the ecological factors that influence selection and expressed genetic variation across traits. We found that some factors - temperature and competition - are unlikely to generate the correlation because they affected one parameter more than the other, and identified others - most notably, environmental novelty - that merit further investigation because little is known about their impact on one of the two parameters. We argue that the correlation between selection and genetic variation deserves attention alongside other factors that promote or constrain evolution in heterogeneous landscapes.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  Anthropogenic change; breeder's equation; cryptic genetic variation; environmental heterogeneity; heritability; novel environments; response to selection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27531600     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  12 in total

1.  Plastic responses to novel environments are biased towards phenotype dimensions with high additive genetic variation.

Authors:  Daniel W A Noble; Reinder Radersma; Tobias Uller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  No evidence that warmer temperatures are associated with selection for smaller body sizes.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Michael B Morrissey; Stephanie M Carlson; Clinton D Francis; Joel G Kingsolver; Kenneth D Whitney; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences.

Authors:  Andrew P Hendry; Kiyoko M Gotanda; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Evidence for Selection-by-Environment but Not Genotype-by-Environment Interactions for Fitness-Related Traits in a Wild Mammal Population.

Authors:  Adam D Hayward; Josephine M Pemberton; Camillo Berenos; Alastair J Wilson; Jill G Pilkington; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Human influences on the strength of phenotypic selection.

Authors:  Vincent Fugère; Andrew P Hendry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Species-specific effects of thermal stress on the expression of genetic variation across a diverse group of plant and animal taxa under experimental conditions.

Authors:  Klaus Fischer; Jürgen Kreyling; Michaël Beaulieu; Ilka Beil; Manuela Bog; Dries Bonte; Stefanie Holm; Sabine Knoblauch; Dustin Koch; Lena Muffler; Pierick Mouginot; Maria Paulinich; J F Scheepens; Raijana Schiemann; Jonas Schmeddes; Martin Schnittler; Gabriele Uhl; Marieke van der Maaten-Theunissen; Julia M Weier; Martin Wilmking; Robert Weigel; Phillip Gienapp
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 7.  The interplay between plasticity and evolution in response to human-induced environmental change.

Authors:  Sarah E Diamond; Ryan A Martin
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-12-08

8.  Temporal fitness fluctuations in experimental Arabidopsis thaliana populations.

Authors:  Jinyong Hu; Li Lei; Juliette de Meaux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Environmental coupling of heritability and selection is rare and of minor evolutionary significance in wild populations.

Authors:  Jip J C Ramakers; Antica Culina; Marcel E Visser; Phillip Gienapp
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 15.460

10.  Phenological mismatch drives selection on elevation, but not on slope, of breeding time plasticity in a wild songbird.

Authors:  Jip J C Ramakers; Phillip Gienapp; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.