Literature DB >> 27531099

SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA.

Can Kockan1,2, Faraz Hach1,3, Iman Sarrafi1, Robert H Bell3, Brian McConeghy3, Kevin Beja3, Anne Haegert3, Alexander W Wyatt3,4, Stanislav V Volik3, Kim N Chi4, Colin C Collins3,4, S Cenk Sahinalp1,4,5.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Successful development and application of precision oncology approaches require robust elucidation of the genomic landscape of a patient's cancer and, ideally, the ability to monitor therapy-induced genomic changes in the tumour in an inexpensive and minimally invasive manner. Thanks to recent advances in sequencing technologies, 'liquid biopsy', the sampling of patient's bodily fluids such as blood and urine, is considered as one of the most promising approaches to achieve this goal. In many cancer patients, and especially those with advanced metastatic disease, deep sequencing of circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) obtained from patient's blood yields a mixture of reads originating from the normal DNA and from multiple tumour subclones-called circulating tumour DNA or ctDNA. The ctDNA/cfDNA ratio as well as the proportion of ctDNA originating from specific tumour subclones depend on multiple factors, making comprehensive detection of mutations difficult, especially at early stages of cancer. Furthermore, sensitive and accurate detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels from cfDNA is constrained by several factors such as the sequencing errors and PCR artifacts, and mapping errors related to repeat regions within the genome. In this article, we introduce SiNVICT, a computational method that increases the sensitivity and specificity of SNV and indel detection at very low variant allele frequencies. SiNVICT has the capability to handle multiple sequencing platforms with different error properties; it minimizes false positives resulting from mapping errors and other technology specific artifacts including strand bias and low base quality at read ends. SiNVICT also has the capability to perform time-series analysis, where samples from a patient sequenced at multiple time points are jointly examined to report locations of interest where there is a possibility that certain clones were wiped out by some treatment while some subclones gained selective advantage.
RESULTS: We tested SiNVICT on simulated data as well as prostate cancer cell lines and cfDNA obtained from castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. On both simulated and biological data, SiNVICT was able to detect SNVs and indels with variant allele percentages as low as 0.5%. The lowest amounts of total DNA used for the biological data where SNVs and indels could be detected with very high sensitivity were 2.5 ng on the Ion Torrent platform and 10 ng on Illumina. With increased sequencing and mapping accuracy, SiNVICT might be utilized in clinical settings, making it possible to track the progress of point mutations and indels that are associated with resistance to cancer therapies and provide patients personalized treatment. We also compared SiNVICT with other popular SNV callers such as MuTect, VarScan2 and Freebayes. Our results show that SiNVICT performs better than these tools in most cases and allows further data exploration such as time-series analysis on cfDNA sequencing data.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SiNVICT is available at: https://sfu-compbio.github.io/sinvictSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. CONTACT: cenk@sfu.ca.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27531099     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  20 in total

Review 1.  Future of Liquid Biopsies With Growing Technological and Bioinformatics Studies: Opportunities and Challenges in Discovering Tumor Heterogeneity With Single-Cell Level Analysis.

Authors:  Naveen Ramalingam; Stefanie S Jeffrey
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  ABEMUS: platform-specific and data-informed detection of somatic SNVs in cfDNA.

Authors:  Nicola Casiraghi; Francesco Orlando; Yari Ciani; Jenny Xiang; Andrea Sboner; Olivier Elemento; Gerhardt Attard; Himisha Beltran; Francesca Demichelis; Alessandro Romanel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Spatial Distribution of Private Gene Mutations in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ariane L Moore; Aashil A Batavia; Jack Kuipers; Jochen Singer; Elodie Burcklen; Peter Schraml; Christian Beisel; Holger Moch; Niko Beerenwinkel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Unique, dual-indexed sequencing adapters with UMIs effectively eliminate index cross-talk and significantly improve sensitivity of massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Laura E MacConaill; Robert T Burns; Anwesha Nag; Haley A Coleman; Michael K Slevin; Kristina Giorda; Madelyn Light; Kevin Lai; Mirna Jarosz; Matthew S McNeill; Matthew D Ducar; Matthew Meyerson; Aaron R Thorner
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.

Authors:  Ariane L Hofmann; Jonas Behr; Jochen Singer; Jack Kuipers; Christian Beisel; Peter Schraml; Holger Moch; Niko Beerenwinkel
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  What Does This Mutation Mean? The Tools and Pitfalls of Variant Interpretation in Lymphoid Malignancies.

Authors:  Yann Guillermin; Jonathan Lopez; Kaddour Chabane; Sandrine Hayette; Claire Bardel; Gilles Salles; Pierre Sujobert; Sarah Huet
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Cell-free circulating tumor DNA analysis for breast cancer and its clinical utilization as a biomarker.

Authors:  Ru Wang; Xiao Li; Huimin Zhang; Ke Wang; Jianjun He
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  appreci8: a pipeline for precise variant calling integrating 8 tools.

Authors:  Sarah Sandmann; Mohsen Karimi; Aniek O de Graaf; Christian Rohde; Stefanie Göllner; Julian Varghese; Jan Ernsting; Gunilla Walldin; Bert A van der Reijden; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Luca Malcovati; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Joop H Jansen; Martin Dugas
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  A review of somatic single nucleotide variant calling algorithms for next-generation sequencing data.

Authors:  Chang Xu
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 7.271

10.  Clonal Evolution and Heterogeneity of Osimertinib Acquired Resistance Mechanisms in EGFR Mutant Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Nitin Roper; Anna-Leigh Brown; Jun S Wei; Svetlana Pack; Christopher Trindade; Chul Kim; Olivia Restifo; Shaojian Gao; Sivasish Sindiri; Farid Mehrabadi; Rajaa El Meskini; Zoe Weaver Ohler; Tapan K Maity; Abhilash Venugopalan; Constance M Cultraro; Elizabeth Akoth; Emerson Padiernos; Haobin Chen; Aparna Kesarwala; DeeDee K Smart; Naris Nilubol; Arun Rajan; Zofia Piotrowska; Liqiang Xi; Mark Raffeld; Anna R Panchenko; Cenk Sahinalp; Stephen Hewitt; Chuong D Hoang; Javed Khan; Udayan Guha
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2020-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.