Literature DB >> 27531011

Reassessing the Association between WIC and Birth Outcomes Using a Fetuses-at-Risk Approach.

Kathryn R Fingar1, Sibylle H Lob2, Melanie S Dove3, Pat Gradziel4, Michael P Curtis3.   

Abstract

Objectives Women with longer, healthier pregnancies have more time to enroll in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), biasing associations between WIC and birth outcomes. We examined the association between WIC and preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and perinatal death (PND) using a fetuses-at-risk approach to address this bias, termed gestational age bias. Methods We linked California Medi-Cal recipients with a singleton live birth or fetal death from the 2010 Birth Cohort to WIC participant data (n = 236,564). We implemented a fetuses-at-risk approach using survival analysis, which compared, in each week of gestation, women whose pregnancies reached the same length and who had the same opportunity to utilize WIC. In each gestational week, we assessed WIC enrollment and the number of food packages redeemed thus far and computed hazard ratios (HR) using survival models with time-varying exposures and effects. Results Adjusting for maternal socio-demographic and health characteristics, WIC enrollment was associated with a lower risk of PTB from week 29-36 (HR29 = 0.71; HR36 = 0.52); LBW from week 26-40 (HR26 = 0.77; HR40 = 0.64); and PND from week 29-43 (HR29 = 0.78; HR43 = 0.69) (p < 0.05). The number of food packages redeemed was associated with a lower risk of PTB from week 27-36 (HR27 = 0.90; HR36 = 0.84); LBW from week 25-42 (HR25 = 0.93; HR42 = 0.88); and PND from week 27-46 (HR27 = 0.94; HR46 = 0.91) (p < 0.05). Conclusions for Practice To our knowledge this is the first study to examine the association between WIC and birth outcomes using this approach. We found that beginning from about 29 weeks, WIC enrollment was associated with a reduced risk of PTB by 29-48 %, LBW by 23-36 %, and PND by 22-31 %.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth outcomes; Fetuses-at-risk; Gestational age bias; Survival analysis; WIC

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27531011     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2176-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  27 in total

1.  Maternal exposure to ambient temperature and the risks of preterm birth and stillbirth in Brisbane, Australia.

Authors:  Linn B Strand; Adrian G Barnett; Shilu Tong
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The impact of time-dependent bias in proportional hazards modelling.

Authors:  Jan Beyersmann; Martin Wolkewitz; Martin Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in New York City.

Authors:  Ted Joyce; Diane Gibson; Silvie Colman
Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage       Date:  2005

4.  It's About Time: A Survival Approach to Gestational Weight Gain and Preterm Delivery.

Authors:  Emily M Mitchell; Stefanie N Hinkle; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  The birth weight "paradox" uncovered?

Authors:  Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Enrique F Schisterman; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Effects of participation in the WIC program on birthweight: evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.

Authors:  Lori Kowaleski-Jones; Greg J Duncan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Evaluating WIC.

Authors:  D J Besharov; P Germanis
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2000-04

8.  Does WIC work? The effects of WIC on pregnancy and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Marianne P Bitler; Janet Currie
Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage       Date:  2005

9.  Accuracy loss due to selection bias in cohort studies with left truncation.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Aijun Ye; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  8 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of California prenatal participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) to prevent preterm birth.

Authors:  Roch A Nianogo; May C Wang; Ricardo Basurto-Davila; Tabashir Z Nobari; Michael Prelip; Onyebuchi A Arah; Shannon E Whaley
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Risk and Protective Factors for Preterm Birth Among Black Women in Oakland, California.

Authors:  Monica R McLemore; Rachel L Berkowitz; Scott P Oltman; Rebecca J Baer; Linda Franck; Jonathan Fuchs; Deborah A Karasek; Miriam Kuppermann; Safyer McKenzie-Sampson; Daphina Melbourne; Briane Taylor; Shanell Williams; Larry Rand; Brittany D Chambers; Karen Scott; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-10-09

3.  Detecting the Effects of Early-Life Exposures: Why Fecundity Matters.

Authors:  Jenna Nobles; Amar Hamoudi
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2019-11-26

4.  Inequalities and stillbirth in the UK: a meta-narrative review.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Devender Roberts; Mark A Turner; Claire Storey; Nicola Crossland; Kenneth William Finlayson; Soo Downe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The effect of women, infant, and children (WIC) services on birth weight before and during the 2007-2009 great recession in Washington state and Florida: a pooled cross-sectional time series analysis.

Authors:  Erin L Blakeney; Jerald R Herting; Brenda Kaye Zierler; Betty Bekemeier
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Association of participation in a supplemental nutrition program with stillbirth by race, ethnicity, and maternal characteristics.

Authors:  Meghan Angley; Vanessa R Thorsten; Carolyn Drews-Botsch; Donald J Dudley; Robert L Goldenberg; Robert M Silver; Barbara J Stoll; Halit Pinar; Carol J R Hogue
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  USDA Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Vendor Criteria: An Examination of US Administrative Agency Variations.

Authors:  Matthew J Landry; Kim Phan; Jared T McGuirt; Alek Ostrander; Lilian Ademu; Mia Seibold; Kathleen McCallops; Tara Tracy; Sheila E Fleischhacker; Allison Karpyn
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  A Community Prenatal Intervention in Social Nutrition: Evaluating the Impact on Pregnancy and Birthweight Outcomes.

Authors:  Elise Carbonneau; Alex Dumas; Annie Brodeur-Doucet; Bénédicte Fontaine-Bisson
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.