Literature DB >> 27530986

Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Success in Foot and Ankle Patients.

Bryant Ho1, Jeff R Houck2, Adolph S Flemister1, John Ketz1, Irvin Oh1, Benedict F DiGiovanni1, Judith F Baumhauer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of patient-reported outcomes continues to expand beyond the scope of clinical research to involve standard of care assessments across orthopedic practices. It is currently unclear how to interpret and apply this information in the daily care of patients in a foot and ankle clinic. We prospectively examined the relationship between preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS Physical Function, Pain Interference and Depression scores), determined minimal clinical important differences for these values, and assessed if these preoperative values were predictors of improvement after operative intervention.
METHODS: Prospective collection of all consecutive patient visits to a multisurgeon tertiary foot and ankle clinic was obtained between February 2015 and April 2016. This consisted of 16 023 unique visits across 7996 patients, with 3611 new patients. Patients undergoing elective operative intervention were identified by ICD-9 and CPT code. PROMIS physical function, pain interference, and depression scores were assessed at initial and follow-up visits. Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) were calculated using a distribution-based method. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to determine whether preoperative PROMIS scores were predictive of achieving MCID. Cutoff values for PROMIS scores that would predict achieving MCID and not achieving MCID with 95% specificity were determined. Prognostic pre- and posttest probabilities based off these cutoffs were calculated. Patients with a minimum of 7-month follow-up (mean 9.9) who completed all PROMIS domains were included, resulting in 61 patients.
RESULTS: ROC curves demonstrated that preoperative physical function scores were predictive of postoperative improvement in physical function (area under the curve [AUC] 0.83). Similarly, preoperative pain interference scores were predictive of postoperative pain improvement (AUC 0.73) and preoperative depression scores were also predictive of postoperative depression improvement (AUC 0.74). Patients with preoperative physical function T score below 29.7 had an 83% probability of achieving a clinically meaningful improvement in function as defined by MCID. Patients with preoperative physical function T score above 42 had a 94% probability of failing to achieve MCID. Patients with preoperative pain above 67.2 had a 66% probability of achieving MCID, whereas patients with preoperative pain below 55 had a 95% probability of failing to achieve MCID. Patients with preoperative depression below 41.5 had a 90% probability of failing to achieve MCID.
CONCLUSION: Patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS) scores obtained preoperatively predicted improvement in foot and ankle surgery. Threshold levels in physical function, pain interference, and depression can be shared with patients as they decide whether surgery is a good option and helps place a numerical value on patient expectations. Physical function scores below 29.7 were likely to improve with surgery, whereas those patients with scores above 42 were unlikely to make gains in function. Patients with pain scores less than 55 were similarly unlikely to improve, whereas those with scores above 67 had clinically significant pain reduction postoperatively. Reported prognostic cutoff values help to provide guidance to both the surgeon and the patient and can aid in shared decision making for treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROMIS; foot and ankle surgery; patient-reported outcomes; predictive outcome; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27530986     DOI: 10.1177/1071100716665113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  58 in total

1.  Operative Intervention Does Not Change Pain Perception in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Olivia V Waldman; Stephanie P Hao; Jeff R Houck; Nicolette J Lee; Judith F Baumhauer; Irvin Oh
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-04

2.  Using Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures to Understand the Relationship Between Improvement in Physical Function and Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Casey M Beleckas; Jason Guattery; Aaron M Chamberlain; Taleef Khan; Michael P Kelly; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in orthopedic foot and ankle surgery patients.

Authors:  Anika Stephan; Jens Mainzer; Danica Kümmel; Franco M Impellizzeri
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Embedding and Sustaining a Focus on Function in Specialty Research and Care.

Authors:  Kathryn E Callahan; Malaz Boustani; Lauren Ferrante; Daniel E Forman; Jerry Gurwitz; Kevin P High; Frances McFarland; Thomas Robinson; Stephanie Studenski; Mia Yang; Kenneth E Schmader
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Preinjury to Postinjury Disablement and Recovery After a Lateral Ankle Sprain: A Case Report.

Authors:  John J Fraser; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  The utility of PROMIS domain measures in dermatologic care.

Authors:  Fatema Esaa; James Prezzano; Alice Pentland; Julie Ryan Wolf
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.017

7.  Use of PROMIS-29® in US Veterans: Diagnostic Concordance and Domain Comparisons with the General Population.

Authors:  Sherri L LaVela; Bella Etingen; Scott Miskevics; David Cella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The Relationship of PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function Scales.

Authors:  Richard Kendall; Bill Wagner; Darrel Brodke; Jerry Bounsanga; Maren Voss; Yushan Gu; Ryan Spiker; Brandon Lawrence; Man Hung
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative PROMIS Score Improvement for Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery.

Authors:  David N Bernstein; Jeff R Houck; Ronald M Gonzalez; Danielle M Wilbur; Richard J Miller; David J Mitten; Warren C Hammert
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-08-03

10.  PROMIS Physical and Emotional Health Scores Are Worse in Musculoskeletal Patients Presenting to Physiatrists than to Other Orthopedic Specialists.

Authors:  Abby L Cheng; Ryan Calfee; Graham Colditz; Heidi Prather
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.