Literature DB >> 27530816

Creation and Validation of a Novel Mobile Simulation Laboratory for High Fidelity, Prehospital, Difficult Airway Simulation.

Jason J Bischof1, Ashish R Panchal1, Geoffrey I Finnegan1, Thomas E Terndrup1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Introduction Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a complex clinical skill complicated by the inherent challenge of providing care in the prehospital setting. Literature reports a low success rate of prehospital ETI attempts, partly due to the care environment and partly to the lack of consistent standardized training opportunities of prehospital providers in ETI. Hypothesis/Problem The availability of a mobile simulation laboratory (MSL) to study clinically critical interventions is needed in the prehospital setting to enhance instruction and maintain proficiency. This report is on the development and validation of a prehospital airway simulator and MSL that mimics in situ care provided in an ambulance.
METHODS: The MSL was a Type 3 ambulance with four cameras allowing audio-video recordings of observable behaviors. The prehospital airway simulator is a modified airway mannequin with increased static tongue pressure and a rigid cervical collar. Airway experts validated the model in a static setting through ETI at varying tongue pressures with a goal of a Grade 3 Cormack-Lehane (CL) laryngeal view. Following completion of this development, the MSL was launched with the prehospital airway simulator to distant communities utilizing a single facilitator/driver. Paramedics were recruited to perform ETI in the MSL, and the detailed airway management observations were stored for further analysis.
RESULTS: Nineteen airway experts performed 57 ETI attempts at varying tongue pressures demonstrating increased CL views at higher tongue pressures. Tongue pressure of 60 mm Hg generated 31% Grade 3/4 CL view and was chosen for the prehospital trials. The MSL was launched and tested by 18 paramedics. First pass success was 33% with another 33% failing to intubate within three attempts.
CONCLUSIONS: The MSL created was configured to deliver, record, and assess intubator behaviors with a difficult airway simulation. The MSL created a reproducible, high fidelity, mobile learning environment for assessment of simulated ETI performance by prehospital providers. Bischof JJ , Panchal AR , Finnegan GI , Terndrup TE . Creation and validation of a novel mobile simulation laboratory for high fidelity, prehospital, difficult airway simulation. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(5):465-470.

Keywords:  CL Cormack-Lehane; EMS; EMS Emergency Medical Services; ETI endotracheal intubation; ETT endotracheal tube; MSL mobile simulation laboratory; airway management; endotracheal intubation; prehospital; simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27530816     DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X16000534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med        ISSN: 1049-023X            Impact factor:   2.040


  3 in total

Review 1.  Is in situ simulation in emergency medicine safe? A scoping review.

Authors:  Jennifer Truchot; Valérie Boucher; Winny Li; Guillaume Martel; Eva Jouhair; Éliane Raymond-Dufresne; Andrew Petrosoniak; Marcel Emond
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  A Randomized Comparison of In-hospital Rescuer Positions for Endotracheal Intubation in a Difficult Airway.

Authors:  Joanna M Le Parc; Jason J Bischof; Andrew M King; Sarah Greenberger; David P Way; Ashish R Panchal; Geoffrey I Finnegan; Thomas E Terndrup
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-15

3.  Evaluation of a Mobile Telesimulation Unit to Train Rural and Remote Practitioners on High-Acuity Low-Occurrence Procedures: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Jewer; Michael H Parsons; Cody Dunne; Andrew Smith; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.